Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Catumbela, Emanuel
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Santos, Cristina, Freitas, Alberto, Costa, Carlos, Sarmento, António, da Costa Pereira, Altamiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360
Resumo: Introduction: After conducting a systematic review of quality indicators for assessing HIV/AIDS clinical care, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance and practice utility of those indicators from the point of view of HIV/AIDS physician experts. Material and Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study, in which we selected, by convenience, physicians who work in an Infectious Disease Department of a central hospital to complete two questionnaires with a core set of indicators to establish the most relevant and useful indicators for assessment of the clinical HIV/AIDS care. A Likert scale was used to rank the indicators. Results: Eleven of thirteen physicians filled two questionnaires. From the initial list of 53 quality indicators, 21 were identified as the most relevant and useful in HIV/AIDS clinical care. The internal consistency for clinical relevance in each indicators domain was for clinical signs and symptoms (p = 0.971), for therapy (p = 0.900), for prognosis (p = 0.820) and diagnosis (p = 0.733) and for practice utility were diagnosis (p = 0.934), clinical signs (p = 0.964), laboratory examinations (p = 0.947), therapy (p = 0.583) and prognosis (p = 0.368). Discussion: In the process of assessing the clinical relevance and practice utility of HIV/AIDS quality care indicators, it was found that the majority of physicians agreed that diagnosis and clinical symptoms and signs indicators domains are the most important for assessing the quality of care for HIV/AIDS patients. Conclusion: This instrument should be considered as a diagnostic tool, allowing hospital administrators to identify if HIV/AIDS care is properly delivered or needs improvement.
id RCAP_afc5eda929bdffd2f197328fa5b4faec
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/30634
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDAHIV/AIDS indicators for clinical care quality assessmentRelevance and utility assessed by health professionalsRelevância e utilidade avaliadas por profissionais de saúdeAcquired immunodeficiency syndromeHIV infectionsPatient careQuality assurance, health careQuality indicators, health careMedicine(all)SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingIntroduction: After conducting a systematic review of quality indicators for assessing HIV/AIDS clinical care, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance and practice utility of those indicators from the point of view of HIV/AIDS physician experts. Material and Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study, in which we selected, by convenience, physicians who work in an Infectious Disease Department of a central hospital to complete two questionnaires with a core set of indicators to establish the most relevant and useful indicators for assessment of the clinical HIV/AIDS care. A Likert scale was used to rank the indicators. Results: Eleven of thirteen physicians filled two questionnaires. From the initial list of 53 quality indicators, 21 were identified as the most relevant and useful in HIV/AIDS clinical care. The internal consistency for clinical relevance in each indicators domain was for clinical signs and symptoms (p = 0.971), for therapy (p = 0.900), for prognosis (p = 0.820) and diagnosis (p = 0.733) and for practice utility were diagnosis (p = 0.934), clinical signs (p = 0.964), laboratory examinations (p = 0.947), therapy (p = 0.583) and prognosis (p = 0.368). Discussion: In the process of assessing the clinical relevance and practice utility of HIV/AIDS quality care indicators, it was found that the majority of physicians agreed that diagnosis and clinical symptoms and signs indicators domains are the most important for assessing the quality of care for HIV/AIDS patients. Conclusion: This instrument should be considered as a diagnostic tool, allowing hospital administrators to identify if HIV/AIDS care is properly delivered or needs improvement.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)RUNCatumbela, EmanuelSantos, CristinaFreitas, AlbertoCosta, CarlosSarmento, Antónioda Costa Pereira, Altamiro2018-02-16T23:06:56Z2016-06-012016-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360por0870-399XPURE: 16465067http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977558292&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:16:53Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/30634Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:29:30.604305Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
HIV/AIDS indicators for clinical care quality assessmentRelevance and utility assessed by health professionals
Relevância e utilidade avaliadas por profissionais de saúde
title Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
spellingShingle Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
Catumbela, Emanuel
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
HIV infections
Patient care
Quality assurance, health care
Quality indicators, health care
Medicine(all)
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
title_short Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
title_full Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
title_fullStr Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
title_full_unstemmed Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
title_sort Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA
author Catumbela, Emanuel
author_facet Catumbela, Emanuel
Santos, Cristina
Freitas, Alberto
Costa, Carlos
Sarmento, António
da Costa Pereira, Altamiro
author_role author
author2 Santos, Cristina
Freitas, Alberto
Costa, Carlos
Sarmento, António
da Costa Pereira, Altamiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Catumbela, Emanuel
Santos, Cristina
Freitas, Alberto
Costa, Carlos
Sarmento, António
da Costa Pereira, Altamiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
HIV infections
Patient care
Quality assurance, health care
Quality indicators, health care
Medicine(all)
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
topic Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
HIV infections
Patient care
Quality assurance, health care
Quality indicators, health care
Medicine(all)
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
description Introduction: After conducting a systematic review of quality indicators for assessing HIV/AIDS clinical care, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance and practice utility of those indicators from the point of view of HIV/AIDS physician experts. Material and Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study, in which we selected, by convenience, physicians who work in an Infectious Disease Department of a central hospital to complete two questionnaires with a core set of indicators to establish the most relevant and useful indicators for assessment of the clinical HIV/AIDS care. A Likert scale was used to rank the indicators. Results: Eleven of thirteen physicians filled two questionnaires. From the initial list of 53 quality indicators, 21 were identified as the most relevant and useful in HIV/AIDS clinical care. The internal consistency for clinical relevance in each indicators domain was for clinical signs and symptoms (p = 0.971), for therapy (p = 0.900), for prognosis (p = 0.820) and diagnosis (p = 0.733) and for practice utility were diagnosis (p = 0.934), clinical signs (p = 0.964), laboratory examinations (p = 0.947), therapy (p = 0.583) and prognosis (p = 0.368). Discussion: In the process of assessing the clinical relevance and practice utility of HIV/AIDS quality care indicators, it was found that the majority of physicians agreed that diagnosis and clinical symptoms and signs indicators domains are the most important for assessing the quality of care for HIV/AIDS patients. Conclusion: This instrument should be considered as a diagnostic tool, allowing hospital administrators to identify if HIV/AIDS care is properly delivered or needs improvement.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
2016-06-01T00:00:00Z
2018-02-16T23:06:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360
url https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0870-399X
PURE: 16465067
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977558292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 12
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137920587661312