Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bowler, Shaun
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Donovan, Todd
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874
Resumo: We examine the gap between perceptions of seeing referendums as an important democratic principle, versus perceiving how referendums are used in practice. We term this the “referendum disappointment” gap. We find support for referendums as a democratic principle is strongest among those most disaffected from the political system, and that the disaffected are more likely to perceive they are not given a say via referendums. We also find context-specific effects. Disappointment was greater in countries with higher corruption and income inequality. We also find higher disappointment among right-populist voters, those who distrusted politicians, and among people who viewed themselves at the bottom of society. Overall, these patterns reflect disappointment with democracy among sections of society who have a sense of not being heard that conflicts with how they expect democracy should work in principle.
id RCAP_b0638f9bba980a668db5192675ccfe3c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1874
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gapdemocracy; direct democracy; inequality; political disaffection; populism; public opinion; referendumsWe examine the gap between perceptions of seeing referendums as an important democratic principle, versus perceiving how referendums are used in practice. We term this the “referendum disappointment” gap. We find support for referendums as a democratic principle is strongest among those most disaffected from the political system, and that the disaffected are more likely to perceive they are not given a say via referendums. We also find context-specific effects. Disappointment was greater in countries with higher corruption and income inequality. We also find higher disappointment among right-populist voters, those who distrusted politicians, and among people who viewed themselves at the bottom of society. Overall, these patterns reflect disappointment with democracy among sections of society who have a sense of not being heard that conflicts with how they expect democracy should work in principle.Cogitatio2019-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1874Politics and Governance; Vol 7, No 2 (2019): The Politics, Promise and Peril of Direct Democracy; 227-2412183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1874https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1874/1874https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/1874/450https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/1874/550Copyright (c) 2019 Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovanhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBowler, ShaunDonovan, Todd2022-12-22T15:16:11Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1874Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:17.120806Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
title Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
spellingShingle Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
Bowler, Shaun
democracy; direct democracy; inequality; political disaffection; populism; public opinion; referendums
title_short Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
title_full Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
title_fullStr Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
title_sort Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap
author Bowler, Shaun
author_facet Bowler, Shaun
Donovan, Todd
author_role author
author2 Donovan, Todd
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bowler, Shaun
Donovan, Todd
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv democracy; direct democracy; inequality; political disaffection; populism; public opinion; referendums
topic democracy; direct democracy; inequality; political disaffection; populism; public opinion; referendums
description We examine the gap between perceptions of seeing referendums as an important democratic principle, versus perceiving how referendums are used in practice. We term this the “referendum disappointment” gap. We find support for referendums as a democratic principle is strongest among those most disaffected from the political system, and that the disaffected are more likely to perceive they are not given a say via referendums. We also find context-specific effects. Disappointment was greater in countries with higher corruption and income inequality. We also find higher disappointment among right-populist voters, those who distrusted politicians, and among people who viewed themselves at the bottom of society. Overall, these patterns reflect disappointment with democracy among sections of society who have a sense of not being heard that conflicts with how they expect democracy should work in principle.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1874
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1874
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1874
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1874/1874
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/1874/450
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/1874/550
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 7, No 2 (2019): The Politics, Promise and Peril of Direct Democracy; 227-241
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130668758728704