Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal, A.J.S.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Campilho, R.D.S.G., Silva, F.J.G., Silva, D.F.O., Moreira, F.J.P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927
Resumo: Cohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results.
id RCAP_b188bb280e5fca50de08044921bb6ab1
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/15927
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesiveAdhesive jointsCohesive zone modellingFracture toughnessCohesive strengthFinite Element MethodCohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results.ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoLeal, A.J.S.Campilho, R.D.S.G.Silva, F.J.G.Silva, D.F.O.Moreira, F.J.P.2020-04-29T13:47:59Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927eng10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.177info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T13:01:26Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/15927Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:35:39.305741Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
title Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
spellingShingle Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
Leal, A.J.S.
Adhesive joints
Cohesive zone modelling
Fracture toughness
Cohesive strength
Finite Element Method
title_short Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
title_full Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
title_fullStr Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
title_sort Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
author Leal, A.J.S.
author_facet Leal, A.J.S.
Campilho, R.D.S.G.
Silva, F.J.G.
Silva, D.F.O.
Moreira, F.J.P.
author_role author
author2 Campilho, R.D.S.G.
Silva, F.J.G.
Silva, D.F.O.
Moreira, F.J.P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal, A.J.S.
Campilho, R.D.S.G.
Silva, F.J.G.
Silva, D.F.O.
Moreira, F.J.P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesive joints
Cohesive zone modelling
Fracture toughness
Cohesive strength
Finite Element Method
topic Adhesive joints
Cohesive zone modelling
Fracture toughness
Cohesive strength
Finite Element Method
description Cohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-04-29T13:47:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.177
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131447948214272