Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927 |
Resumo: | Cohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results. |
id |
RCAP_b188bb280e5fca50de08044921bb6ab1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/15927 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesiveAdhesive jointsCohesive zone modellingFracture toughnessCohesive strengthFinite Element MethodCohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results.ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoLeal, A.J.S.Campilho, R.D.S.G.Silva, F.J.G.Silva, D.F.O.Moreira, F.J.P.2020-04-29T13:47:59Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927eng10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.177info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T13:01:26Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/15927Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:35:39.305741Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
title |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive Leal, A.J.S. Adhesive joints Cohesive zone modelling Fracture toughness Cohesive strength Finite Element Method |
title_short |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
title_full |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
title_sort |
Comparison of different test configurations for the shear fracture toughness evaluation of a ductile adhesive |
author |
Leal, A.J.S. |
author_facet |
Leal, A.J.S. Campilho, R.D.S.G. Silva, F.J.G. Silva, D.F.O. Moreira, F.J.P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campilho, R.D.S.G. Silva, F.J.G. Silva, D.F.O. Moreira, F.J.P. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal, A.J.S. Campilho, R.D.S.G. Silva, F.J.G. Silva, D.F.O. Moreira, F.J.P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adhesive joints Cohesive zone modelling Fracture toughness Cohesive strength Finite Element Method |
topic |
Adhesive joints Cohesive zone modelling Fracture toughness Cohesive strength Finite Element Method |
description |
Cohesive zone modelling (CZM) is widely used for predicting the strength of adhesive joints. The key variable for crack path modelling is the critical strain energy release rate (GC), which can be separated into the tensile (GIC) and shear (GIIC) components. In shear, the End Notched Flexure (ENF) test is widespread. However, other test methods exist and could be a viable replacement. This work aims to make a numerical evaluation between the ENF and Four-Point End Notched Flexure (4ENF) tests to determine GIIC of a ductile adhesive (SikaForce® 7752) and to provide shear CZM laws for further application in design. An inverse technique was used to obtain the shear CZM laws of the adhesive. It was concluded that the GIIC values obtained by the ENF and 4ENF tests are in good agreement. The numerical analysis led to unique shear CZM laws for both tests, with similar results. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z 2020-04-29T13:47:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/15927 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.177 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131447948214272 |