Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.17645/pag.v4i2.570 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570 |
Resumo: | Drawing on insights from social networks, social cognition and the study of emotions, this conceptual article offers a set of ideas and a series of predictions on how systematic variation in two sets of relationships may bear on agency behavior. The first is the agency-audience relationship which revolves around how and what multiple audiences think about public agencies, how these thoughts impact upon agency behavior, how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple audiences and how it influences audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationship between the reputation of an agency head and the reputation of that agency. The article identifies six broad areas that offer the most promising possibilities for future research on bureaucratic reputation, calling on researchers to incorporate insights from the aforementioned literatures, to dimensionalize these sets of relationships and to assess the generalizability of reputation’s effects. |
id |
RCAP_b1c45f6d6d3d5342def32fe5d6478938 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Frameworkagency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networksDrawing on insights from social networks, social cognition and the study of emotions, this conceptual article offers a set of ideas and a series of predictions on how systematic variation in two sets of relationships may bear on agency behavior. The first is the agency-audience relationship which revolves around how and what multiple audiences think about public agencies, how these thoughts impact upon agency behavior, how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple audiences and how it influences audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationship between the reputation of an agency head and the reputation of that agency. The article identifies six broad areas that offer the most promising possibilities for future research on bureaucratic reputation, calling on researchers to incorporate insights from the aforementioned literatures, to dimensionalize these sets of relationships and to assess the generalizability of reputation’s effects.Cogitatio2016-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 2 (2016): New Approaches to Political Leadership; 80-902183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570/570Copyright (c) 2016 Moshe Maorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaor, Moshe2022-12-22T15:15:43Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:12.388391Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
title |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
spellingShingle |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework Maor, Moshe agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks Maor, Moshe agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks |
title_short |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
title_full |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
title_fullStr |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
title_full_unstemmed |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
title_sort |
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework |
author |
Maor, Moshe |
author_facet |
Maor, Moshe Maor, Moshe |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maor, Moshe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks |
topic |
agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks |
description |
Drawing on insights from social networks, social cognition and the study of emotions, this conceptual article offers a set of ideas and a series of predictions on how systematic variation in two sets of relationships may bear on agency behavior. The first is the agency-audience relationship which revolves around how and what multiple audiences think about public agencies, how these thoughts impact upon agency behavior, how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple audiences and how it influences audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationship between the reputation of an agency head and the reputation of that agency. The article identifies six broad areas that offer the most promising possibilities for future research on bureaucratic reputation, calling on researchers to incorporate insights from the aforementioned literatures, to dimensionalize these sets of relationships and to assess the generalizability of reputation’s effects. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-23 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570/570 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Moshe Maor http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Moshe Maor http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 2 (2016): New Approaches to Political Leadership; 80-90 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822183318885498880 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17645/pag.v4i2.570 |