Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maor, Moshe
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i2.570
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570
Resumo: Drawing on insights from social networks, social cognition and the study of emotions, this conceptual article offers a set of ideas and a series of predictions on how systematic variation in two sets of relationships may bear on agency behavior. The first is the agency-audience relationship which revolves around how and what multiple audiences think about public agencies, how these thoughts impact upon agency behavior, how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple audiences and how it influences audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationship between the reputation of an agency head and the reputation of that agency. The article identifies six broad areas that offer the most promising possibilities for future research on bureaucratic reputation, calling on researchers to incorporate insights from the aforementioned literatures, to dimensionalize these sets of relationships and to assess the generalizability of reputation’s effects.
id RCAP_b1c45f6d6d3d5342def32fe5d6478938
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Frameworkagency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networksDrawing on insights from social networks, social cognition and the study of emotions, this conceptual article offers a set of ideas and a series of predictions on how systematic variation in two sets of relationships may bear on agency behavior. The first is the agency-audience relationship which revolves around how and what multiple audiences think about public agencies, how these thoughts impact upon agency behavior, how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple audiences and how it influences audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationship between the reputation of an agency head and the reputation of that agency. The article identifies six broad areas that offer the most promising possibilities for future research on bureaucratic reputation, calling on researchers to incorporate insights from the aforementioned literatures, to dimensionalize these sets of relationships and to assess the generalizability of reputation’s effects.Cogitatio2016-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 2 (2016): New Approaches to Political Leadership; 80-902183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570/570Copyright (c) 2016 Moshe Maorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaor, Moshe2022-12-22T15:15:43Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:12.388391Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
title Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
spellingShingle Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
Maor, Moshe
agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks
Maor, Moshe
agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks
title_short Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
title_full Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
title_fullStr Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
title_full_unstemmed Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
title_sort Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework
author Maor, Moshe
author_facet Maor, Moshe
Maor, Moshe
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maor, Moshe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks
topic agency head; audiences; bureaucratic reputation; emotion; social cognition; social networks
description Drawing on insights from social networks, social cognition and the study of emotions, this conceptual article offers a set of ideas and a series of predictions on how systematic variation in two sets of relationships may bear on agency behavior. The first is the agency-audience relationship which revolves around how and what multiple audiences think about public agencies, how these thoughts impact upon agency behavior, how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple audiences and how it influences audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationship between the reputation of an agency head and the reputation of that agency. The article identifies six broad areas that offer the most promising possibilities for future research on bureaucratic reputation, calling on researchers to incorporate insights from the aforementioned literatures, to dimensionalize these sets of relationships and to assess the generalizability of reputation’s effects.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/570
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.570
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/570/570
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Moshe Maor
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Moshe Maor
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 2 (2016): New Approaches to Political Leadership; 80-90
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822183318885498880
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17645/pag.v4i2.570