The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469 |
Resumo: | The selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019. |
id |
RCAP_b24c8c4d10abc5c04ad922e33842be26 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedurescandidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European electionsThe selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019.Cogitatio2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 9-222183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469/469Copyright (c) 2016 Gert-Jan Put, Steven Van Hecke, Corey Cunningham, Wouter Wolfshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPut, Gert-JanVan Hecke, StevenCunningham, CoreyWolfs, Wouter2022-10-21T16:03:08Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:45.740564Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
title |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
spellingShingle |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures Put, Gert-Jan candidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European elections |
title_short |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
title_full |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
title_fullStr |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
title_sort |
The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures |
author |
Put, Gert-Jan |
author_facet |
Put, Gert-Jan Van Hecke, Steven Cunningham, Corey Wolfs, Wouter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Van Hecke, Steven Cunningham, Corey Wolfs, Wouter |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Put, Gert-Jan Van Hecke, Steven Cunningham, Corey Wolfs, Wouter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
candidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European elections |
topic |
candidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European elections |
description |
The selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469/469 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Gert-Jan Put, Steven Van Hecke, Corey Cunningham, Wouter Wolfs http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Gert-Jan Put, Steven Van Hecke, Corey Cunningham, Wouter Wolfs http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 9-22 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130591194513408 |