The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Put, Gert-Jan
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Van Hecke, Steven, Cunningham, Corey, Wolfs, Wouter
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469
Resumo: The selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019.
id RCAP_b24c8c4d10abc5c04ad922e33842be26
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedurescandidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European electionsThe selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019.Cogitatio2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 9-222183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469/469Copyright (c) 2016 Gert-Jan Put, Steven Van Hecke, Corey Cunningham, Wouter Wolfshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPut, Gert-JanVan Hecke, StevenCunningham, CoreyWolfs, Wouter2022-10-21T16:03:08Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:45.740564Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
title The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
spellingShingle The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
Put, Gert-Jan
candidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European elections
title_short The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
title_full The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
title_fullStr The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
title_full_unstemmed The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
title_sort The Choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A Comparative Analysis of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures
author Put, Gert-Jan
author_facet Put, Gert-Jan
Van Hecke, Steven
Cunningham, Corey
Wolfs, Wouter
author_role author
author2 Van Hecke, Steven
Cunningham, Corey
Wolfs, Wouter
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Put, Gert-Jan
Van Hecke, Steven
Cunningham, Corey
Wolfs, Wouter
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv candidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European elections
topic candidate selection; Europarties; European Commission; European elections
description The selection of leading candidates by the political families, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, is relatively groundbreaking as it is the first form of political recruitment organized at the EU level. The literature on candidate selection procedures has so far concentrated on national parties and their procedures. To our knowledge the analytical model has not yet been applied at the EU level. This article will fill this gap by examining the selection procedures of Europarties, more particularly for their EC presidency candidates, a novelty of the 2014 European Parliament elections. Based on the analysis of the procedures applied within the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), the European Green Party (EGP), and the Party of the European Left (EL), one of the main findings of this article is that the procedures are largely copy-paste from the Europarties’ internal procedures for selecting a president. This can largely be explained by the lack of time and experience their party elites had in the run-up to the 2014 elections. We therefore expect the Europarties to further professionalize their selection procedures and start the process earlier with more high profile politicians to stand as candidates in 2019.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/469
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.469
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/469/469
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Gert-Jan Put, Steven Van Hecke, Corey Cunningham, Wouter Wolfs
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Gert-Jan Put, Steven Van Hecke, Corey Cunningham, Wouter Wolfs
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 9-22
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130591194513408