Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.11751 |
Resumo: | In Judgment no. 123/2021, the Constitutional Court stated the existence of a right to “medically assisted” death as “the right to die or be put to death (by a third party and with the support of public authority)”, in borderline situations of serious, incurable, and fatal disease, and of mere “anticipation of death” regarding a patient already undergoing a natural (and irreversible) death process. This text discusses the ethical, deontological, legal-constitutional, and criminal-legal possibility of such a right. It analyses the repercussions of the legalisation of direct active euthanasia on medical ethics and deontology, the model of medicine, the meaning of the medical profession, the concept of medical act, the doctor-patient relationship, and the freedom and autonomy of the patient who asks fordeath within the aforementioned framework. Since that Judgement refers to the National Assembly Decree no. 109/XIV, the text criticises the concept of person underlying that same Decree, the National Assembly Decree that followed it (no. 199/XIV) and the Law Projects (presented in the XV Legislature) that intend to legalise euthanasia, as well as the intention to regulate “medically assisted” death as a mere confrontation of consciences and individual rights between patient and doctor. |
id |
RCAP_b2682b970d44f6bdfdd0176d2724931c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/11751 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIVAlgumas reflexões a propósito do acórdão n.º 123/2021 do tribunal constitucional. Constitucionalidade da eutanásia ativa direta? Mundividência, conceções de pessoa humana e de «ato médico» subjacentes aos decretos da Assembleia da República n.os 109In Judgment no. 123/2021, the Constitutional Court stated the existence of a right to “medically assisted” death as “the right to die or be put to death (by a third party and with the support of public authority)”, in borderline situations of serious, incurable, and fatal disease, and of mere “anticipation of death” regarding a patient already undergoing a natural (and irreversible) death process. This text discusses the ethical, deontological, legal-constitutional, and criminal-legal possibility of such a right. It analyses the repercussions of the legalisation of direct active euthanasia on medical ethics and deontology, the model of medicine, the meaning of the medical profession, the concept of medical act, the doctor-patient relationship, and the freedom and autonomy of the patient who asks fordeath within the aforementioned framework. Since that Judgement refers to the National Assembly Decree no. 109/XIV, the text criticises the concept of person underlying that same Decree, the National Assembly Decree that followed it (no. 199/XIV) and the Law Projects (presented in the XV Legislature) that intend to legalise euthanasia, as well as the intention to regulate “medically assisted” death as a mere confrontation of consciences and individual rights between patient and doctor.No Acórdão n.º 123/2021, o Tribunal Constitucional afirmou a existência de um direito à morte «medicamente assistida» enquanto «direito a morrer ou a ser morto (por um terceiro e com o apoio da autoridade pública)», em situações-limite de doença grave, incurável e fatal e de mera «antecipação da morte» relativamente a doente já incurso num processo natural (e irreversível) de morte. Neste texto, discute-se a possibilidade ética, deontológica, jurídico-constitucional e jurídico-penal de tal direito. Analisam-se as repercussões da legalização da eutanásia ativa direta sobre a ética e a deontologia médicas, o modelo de medicina, o sentido da profissão médica, o conceito de ato médico, a relação médico-paciente, a liberdade e autonomia do doente que pede a morte no quadro referido. Uma vez que aquele Acórdão se reporta ao Decreto da AR, n.º 109/XIV, critica-se a conceção de pessoa subjacente a esse Decreto, ao Decreto da AR que se lhe seguiu (n.º 199/XIV) e aos Projetos de Lei (apresentados na XV Legislatura) que visam legalizar a eutanásia, bem como a pretensão de regular a morte «medicamente assistida» numa perspetiva de puro confronto de consciências e direitos individuais entre o doente e o médico.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2022-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.11751https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.11751Católica Law Review; Vol 6 No 3 (2022): Criminal law; 95-152Católica Law Review; v. 6 n. 3 (2022): Direito penal; 95-1522184-03342183-933610.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.6.3reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/11751https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/11751/11296Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Teresa Quintela de Britohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrito, Teresa Quintela de2024-01-03T08:32:49Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/11751Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:51.244200Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV Algumas reflexões a propósito do acórdão n.º 123/2021 do tribunal constitucional. Constitucionalidade da eutanásia ativa direta? Mundividência, conceções de pessoa humana e de «ato médico» subjacentes aos decretos da Assembleia da República n.os 109 |
title |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV |
spellingShingle |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV Brito, Teresa Quintela de |
title_short |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV |
title_full |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV |
title_fullStr |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV |
title_sort |
Some reflections regarding the constitutional court judgement no. 123/2021. Constitutionality of direct active euthanasia? Worldviews, conceptions of human person and of “medical act” underlying the National Assembly decrees nos. 109/XIV and 199/XIV |
author |
Brito, Teresa Quintela de |
author_facet |
Brito, Teresa Quintela de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brito, Teresa Quintela de |
description |
In Judgment no. 123/2021, the Constitutional Court stated the existence of a right to “medically assisted” death as “the right to die or be put to death (by a third party and with the support of public authority)”, in borderline situations of serious, incurable, and fatal disease, and of mere “anticipation of death” regarding a patient already undergoing a natural (and irreversible) death process. This text discusses the ethical, deontological, legal-constitutional, and criminal-legal possibility of such a right. It analyses the repercussions of the legalisation of direct active euthanasia on medical ethics and deontology, the model of medicine, the meaning of the medical profession, the concept of medical act, the doctor-patient relationship, and the freedom and autonomy of the patient who asks fordeath within the aforementioned framework. Since that Judgement refers to the National Assembly Decree no. 109/XIV, the text criticises the concept of person underlying that same Decree, the National Assembly Decree that followed it (no. 199/XIV) and the Law Projects (presented in the XV Legislature) that intend to legalise euthanasia, as well as the intention to regulate “medically assisted” death as a mere confrontation of consciences and individual rights between patient and doctor. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.11751 https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.11751 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.11751 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/11751 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/11751/11296 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Teresa Quintela de Brito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Teresa Quintela de Brito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Católica Law Review; Vol 6 No 3 (2022): Criminal law; 95-152 Católica Law Review; v. 6 n. 3 (2022): Direito penal; 95-152 2184-0334 2183-9336 10.34632/catolicalawreview.2022.6.3 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133594227048448 |