Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruns, Axel
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Nuernbergk, Christian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759
Resumo: Social media use is now commonplace across journalism, in spite of lingering unease about the impact the networked, real-time logic of leading social media platforms may have on the quality of journalistic coverage. As a result, distinct journalistic voices are forced to compete more directly with experts, commentators, sources, and other stakeholders within the same space. Such shifting power relations may be observed also in the interactions between political journalists and their audiences on major social media platforms. This article therefore pursues a cross-national comparison of interactions between political journalists and their audiences on Twitter in Germany and Australia, documenting how the differences in the status of Twitter in each country’s media environment manifest in activities and network interactions. In each country, we observed Twitter interactions around the national parliamentary press corps (the Bundespressekonferenz and the Federal Press Gallery), gathering all public tweets by and directed at the journalists’ accounts during 2017. We examine overall activity and engagement patterns and highlight significant differences between the two national groups; and we conduct further network analysis to examine the prevalent connections and engagement between press corps journalists themselves, and between journalists, their audiences, and other interlocutors on Twitter. New structures of information flows, of influence, and thus ultimately of power relations become evident in this analysis.
id RCAP_b3194d677f769d76eb549fd0ac07c6ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1759
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power RelationsAustralia; interactions; Germany; network analysis; political journalism; press corps; social media; TwitterSocial media use is now commonplace across journalism, in spite of lingering unease about the impact the networked, real-time logic of leading social media platforms may have on the quality of journalistic coverage. As a result, distinct journalistic voices are forced to compete more directly with experts, commentators, sources, and other stakeholders within the same space. Such shifting power relations may be observed also in the interactions between political journalists and their audiences on major social media platforms. This article therefore pursues a cross-national comparison of interactions between political journalists and their audiences on Twitter in Germany and Australia, documenting how the differences in the status of Twitter in each country’s media environment manifest in activities and network interactions. In each country, we observed Twitter interactions around the national parliamentary press corps (the Bundespressekonferenz and the Federal Press Gallery), gathering all public tweets by and directed at the journalists’ accounts during 2017. We examine overall activity and engagement patterns and highlight significant differences between the two national groups; and we conduct further network analysis to examine the prevalent connections and engagement between press corps journalists themselves, and between journalists, their audiences, and other interlocutors on Twitter. New structures of information flows, of influence, and thus ultimately of power relations become evident in this analysis.Cogitatio2019-03-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1759Media and Communication; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?; 198-2122183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1759https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1759/1759Copyright (c) 2019 Axel Bruns, Christian Nuernbergkhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruns, AxelNuernbergk, Christian2022-12-20T10:59:19Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1759Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:16.982157Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
title Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
spellingShingle Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
Bruns, Axel
Australia; interactions; Germany; network analysis; political journalism; press corps; social media; Twitter
title_short Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
title_full Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
title_fullStr Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
title_full_unstemmed Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
title_sort Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations
author Bruns, Axel
author_facet Bruns, Axel
Nuernbergk, Christian
author_role author
author2 Nuernbergk, Christian
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruns, Axel
Nuernbergk, Christian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Australia; interactions; Germany; network analysis; political journalism; press corps; social media; Twitter
topic Australia; interactions; Germany; network analysis; political journalism; press corps; social media; Twitter
description Social media use is now commonplace across journalism, in spite of lingering unease about the impact the networked, real-time logic of leading social media platforms may have on the quality of journalistic coverage. As a result, distinct journalistic voices are forced to compete more directly with experts, commentators, sources, and other stakeholders within the same space. Such shifting power relations may be observed also in the interactions between political journalists and their audiences on major social media platforms. This article therefore pursues a cross-national comparison of interactions between political journalists and their audiences on Twitter in Germany and Australia, documenting how the differences in the status of Twitter in each country’s media environment manifest in activities and network interactions. In each country, we observed Twitter interactions around the national parliamentary press corps (the Bundespressekonferenz and the Federal Press Gallery), gathering all public tweets by and directed at the journalists’ accounts during 2017. We examine overall activity and engagement patterns and highlight significant differences between the two national groups; and we conduct further network analysis to examine the prevalent connections and engagement between press corps journalists themselves, and between journalists, their audiences, and other interlocutors on Twitter. New structures of information flows, of influence, and thus ultimately of power relations become evident in this analysis.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1759
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1759
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1759
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1759/1759
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Axel Bruns, Christian Nuernbergk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Axel Bruns, Christian Nuernbergk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?; 198-212
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130659555377152