Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ordoñez Balladares, Andrea
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Abad-Coronel, Cristian, Ramos, João Carlos, Martín Biedma, Benjamín José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103373
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072478
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of monolithic zirconium dioxide subjected to a sintering process in two different furnaces: InFire HTC Speed and CEREC SpeedFire. Methods: Forty restorations were designed and machined using a computer aided design / computer aidded machine (CAD/CAM) system. The restorations were randomly assigned to two groups of 20 samples each, Group 1 for the SpeedFire furnace (fast sintering) and Group 2 for the InFire furnace (slow sintering). Each of the crowns was subjected to a maximum compression load recorded in Newtons (N) and a displacement control with a speed of 1 mm/min. Results: Group 1 presented an average of 1222.8 N and a standard deviation of 136.91 N. Group 2 obtained a mean of 1068.5 N and a standard deviation of 316.39 N. Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the two groups, and the mechanical strength of the material was not affected, which would imply a saving of clinical and laboratory time when performing rapid sintering on monolithic translucent zirconium dioxide restorations. However, rapidly sintered restorations have limited reliability.
id RCAP_b45e03dbfd405bfb7cc1d32c6222623f
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103373
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal UnitszirconiasinteringCAD/CAM materialsfracture strengthThe purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of monolithic zirconium dioxide subjected to a sintering process in two different furnaces: InFire HTC Speed and CEREC SpeedFire. Methods: Forty restorations were designed and machined using a computer aided design / computer aidded machine (CAD/CAM) system. The restorations were randomly assigned to two groups of 20 samples each, Group 1 for the SpeedFire furnace (fast sintering) and Group 2 for the InFire furnace (slow sintering). Each of the crowns was subjected to a maximum compression load recorded in Newtons (N) and a displacement control with a speed of 1 mm/min. Results: Group 1 presented an average of 1222.8 N and a standard deviation of 136.91 N. Group 2 obtained a mean of 1068.5 N and a standard deviation of 316.39 N. Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the two groups, and the mechanical strength of the material was not affected, which would imply a saving of clinical and laboratory time when performing rapid sintering on monolithic translucent zirconium dioxide restorations. However, rapidly sintered restorations have limited reliability.2022-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103373http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103373https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072478eng1996-1944Ordoñez Balladares, AndreaAbad-Coronel, CristianRamos, João CarlosMartín Biedma, Benjamín Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-11-09T21:33:27Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103373Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:13.431974Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
title Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
spellingShingle Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
Ordoñez Balladares, Andrea
zirconia
sintering
CAD/CAM materials
fracture strength
title_short Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
title_full Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
title_sort Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units
author Ordoñez Balladares, Andrea
author_facet Ordoñez Balladares, Andrea
Abad-Coronel, Cristian
Ramos, João Carlos
Martín Biedma, Benjamín José
author_role author
author2 Abad-Coronel, Cristian
Ramos, João Carlos
Martín Biedma, Benjamín José
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ordoñez Balladares, Andrea
Abad-Coronel, Cristian
Ramos, João Carlos
Martín Biedma, Benjamín José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv zirconia
sintering
CAD/CAM materials
fracture strength
topic zirconia
sintering
CAD/CAM materials
fracture strength
description The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of monolithic zirconium dioxide subjected to a sintering process in two different furnaces: InFire HTC Speed and CEREC SpeedFire. Methods: Forty restorations were designed and machined using a computer aided design / computer aidded machine (CAD/CAM) system. The restorations were randomly assigned to two groups of 20 samples each, Group 1 for the SpeedFire furnace (fast sintering) and Group 2 for the InFire furnace (slow sintering). Each of the crowns was subjected to a maximum compression load recorded in Newtons (N) and a displacement control with a speed of 1 mm/min. Results: Group 1 presented an average of 1222.8 N and a standard deviation of 136.91 N. Group 2 obtained a mean of 1068.5 N and a standard deviation of 316.39 N. Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the two groups, and the mechanical strength of the material was not affected, which would imply a saving of clinical and laboratory time when performing rapid sintering on monolithic translucent zirconium dioxide restorations. However, rapidly sintered restorations have limited reliability.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103373
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103373
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072478
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103373
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072478
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1996-1944
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134095204155392