Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19724 |
Resumo: | Bitcoin has recently received special attention in economics and finance as the most popular blockchain technology. This dissertation aims to discuss whether newly machine-leaning models perform better than traditional models in forecasting. Particularly, this study compares the accuracy of the prediction of bitcoin prices using two different models: Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) versus Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), in terms of forecasting errors, and Python routines were used for such purpose. Bitcoin price time series ranges from 2017-06-18 to 2019-08-07, in a daily basis, sourced from the Federal Reserve Economic Data. To compare the results of both models, data was divided into two subsets: training (83.5%) and testing (16.5%). The literature usually indicates that LSTM outperforms ARIMA. In this dissertation, the results do confirm that LSTM forecasts of bitcoin prices improve on average ARIMA predictions by 92% and 94%, according to RMSE and MAE. |
id |
RCAP_b534100e6d7f8f2994c086fa6b5530a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/19724 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTMARIMALSTMBitcoinForecastingPrevisãoBitcoin has recently received special attention in economics and finance as the most popular blockchain technology. This dissertation aims to discuss whether newly machine-leaning models perform better than traditional models in forecasting. Particularly, this study compares the accuracy of the prediction of bitcoin prices using two different models: Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) versus Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), in terms of forecasting errors, and Python routines were used for such purpose. Bitcoin price time series ranges from 2017-06-18 to 2019-08-07, in a daily basis, sourced from the Federal Reserve Economic Data. To compare the results of both models, data was divided into two subsets: training (83.5%) and testing (16.5%). The literature usually indicates that LSTM outperforms ARIMA. In this dissertation, the results do confirm that LSTM forecasts of bitcoin prices improve on average ARIMA predictions by 92% and 94%, according to RMSE and MAE.A Bitcoin tem recebido recentemente especial atenção em áreas como a economia e finanças por ser a mais popular tecnologia de blockchain. Esta dissertação tem como objetivo verificar se os novos modelos de machine-learning apresentam melhores resultados que os modelos tradicionais em previsões. Este estudo compara, em particular, a precisão da previsão do preço da Bitcoin usando dois modelos diferentes: Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) versus Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), em termos de erros de previsão e aplicando rotinas do Python. A análise teve como base os preços diários da Bitcoin entre 18 de junho de 2016 e 7 de agosto de 2019, retirados da base de dados da Reserva Federal. Para comparar os resultados dos dois modelos, os dados foram divididos em duas secções: o treino (83.5%) e o teste (16.5%). A literatura indica que o modelo LSTM tem uma melhor precisão que o ARIMA e nesta dissertação os resultados confirmam que o modelo LSTM melhora em média 92% e 94% a previsão do ARIMA, de acordo com o RMSE e o MAE.2020-01-28T14:59:58Z2019-12-02T00:00:00Z2019-12-022019-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/19724TID:202367193engMendes, João Filipe Batistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:35:28Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/19724Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T03:35:28Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
title |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
spellingShingle |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM Mendes, João Filipe Batista ARIMA LSTM Bitcoin Forecasting Previsão |
title_short |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
title_full |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
title_fullStr |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
title_sort |
Forecasting bitcoin prices: ARIMA vs LSTM |
author |
Mendes, João Filipe Batista |
author_facet |
Mendes, João Filipe Batista |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendes, João Filipe Batista |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ARIMA LSTM Bitcoin Forecasting Previsão |
topic |
ARIMA LSTM Bitcoin Forecasting Previsão |
description |
Bitcoin has recently received special attention in economics and finance as the most popular blockchain technology. This dissertation aims to discuss whether newly machine-leaning models perform better than traditional models in forecasting. Particularly, this study compares the accuracy of the prediction of bitcoin prices using two different models: Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) versus Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), in terms of forecasting errors, and Python routines were used for such purpose. Bitcoin price time series ranges from 2017-06-18 to 2019-08-07, in a daily basis, sourced from the Federal Reserve Economic Data. To compare the results of both models, data was divided into two subsets: training (83.5%) and testing (16.5%). The literature usually indicates that LSTM outperforms ARIMA. In this dissertation, the results do confirm that LSTM forecasts of bitcoin prices improve on average ARIMA predictions by 92% and 94%, according to RMSE and MAE. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-02T00:00:00Z 2019-12-02 2019-09 2020-01-28T14:59:58Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19724 TID:202367193 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19724 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202367193 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817546511411576832 |