Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, BAR
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Henriques, E, Ribeiro, I, Freitas, M
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10884/1328
Resumo: Composite material usage in aircraft has been rising since the 1990s, with significant increases in manufacturing productivity and repeatability due to automation in the production of aeronautic parts made of composite materials, becoming a strong driver for widespread adoption of composites in this industry. Automated Tape Layup (ATL) and Automated Fibre Placement (AFP) are two of the most important automated manufacturing technologies within aeronautics composites, although their cost implications and economic comparison have not been widely studied. This paper presents an economic evaluation of ATL and AFP technologies. Using process-based cost models, the manufacturing process of a horizontal stabiliser is modelled, determining for each technology the associated consumption and use of resources and their implications towards the part final cost. Results show that ATL is less expensive than AFP, due to lower material costs, although with less material efficiency and slower cycle time.
id RCAP_b55a1a8875b2c25f3ddd5bb164f3b4fe
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-cientifico.uatlantica.pt:10884/1328
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts productionoperational research,automationprocess-based cost modelling (PBCM)process modelling,compositesComposite material usage in aircraft has been rising since the 1990s, with significant increases in manufacturing productivity and repeatability due to automation in the production of aeronautic parts made of composite materials, becoming a strong driver for widespread adoption of composites in this industry. Automated Tape Layup (ATL) and Automated Fibre Placement (AFP) are two of the most important automated manufacturing technologies within aeronautics composites, although their cost implications and economic comparison have not been widely studied. This paper presents an economic evaluation of ATL and AFP technologies. Using process-based cost models, the manufacturing process of a horizontal stabiliser is modelled, determining for each technology the associated consumption and use of resources and their implications towards the part final cost. Results show that ATL is less expensive than AFP, due to lower material costs, although with less material efficiency and slower cycle time.Taylor & Francis2018-08-29T09:10:48Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10884/1328enghttps://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508903Soares, BARHenriques, ERibeiro, IFreitas, Minfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-04T11:08:03Zoai:repositorio-cientifico.uatlantica.pt:10884/1328Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:29:54.124902Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
title Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
spellingShingle Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
Soares, BAR
operational research,
automation
process-based cost modelling (PBCM)
process modelling,
composites
title_short Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
title_full Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
title_fullStr Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
title_sort Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production
author Soares, BAR
author_facet Soares, BAR
Henriques, E
Ribeiro, I
Freitas, M
author_role author
author2 Henriques, E
Ribeiro, I
Freitas, M
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, BAR
Henriques, E
Ribeiro, I
Freitas, M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv operational research,
automation
process-based cost modelling (PBCM)
process modelling,
composites
topic operational research,
automation
process-based cost modelling (PBCM)
process modelling,
composites
description Composite material usage in aircraft has been rising since the 1990s, with significant increases in manufacturing productivity and repeatability due to automation in the production of aeronautic parts made of composite materials, becoming a strong driver for widespread adoption of composites in this industry. Automated Tape Layup (ATL) and Automated Fibre Placement (AFP) are two of the most important automated manufacturing technologies within aeronautics composites, although their cost implications and economic comparison have not been widely studied. This paper presents an economic evaluation of ATL and AFP technologies. Using process-based cost models, the manufacturing process of a horizontal stabiliser is modelled, determining for each technology the associated consumption and use of resources and their implications towards the part final cost. Results show that ATL is less expensive than AFP, due to lower material costs, although with less material efficiency and slower cycle time.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-29T09:10:48Z
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10884/1328
url http://hdl.handle.net/10884/1328
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508903
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136781045596160