Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gouveia, Petra
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.7498
Resumo: Purpose: To assess the safety of the dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusions. Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with ME secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) from January 2011 through August 2015. Safety assessment included analysis of cataract progression, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) changes, antihypertensive eye drops requirement and/or glaucoma surgery. Results: Twenty-four eyes (24 patients) were included in the study, 58% female. Mean age was 66.5 years (49 – 95 years). Thirteen BRVO and 11 CRVO were treated in this series. 75% had history of previous treatment (laser, intravitreal injections or vitrectomy). In six patients (25%) the implant was used as first-line therapy. Twenty patients (83.0%) were phakic in the beginning of the study. Cataract progression was observed in two patients, though none required cataract surgery. Ocular hypertension (IOP>21mmHg) was documented in seven patients (29.1%) following treatment and control was reached with antihypertensive eye drops. A mean 3.53 mmHg elevation of IOP wasn’t statistically significant. The subgroup analysis of BRVO and CRVO did not detect differences in the following parameters: cataract progression, cataract surgery, IOP elevation and hypotensive drug requirement. Conclusions: The dexamethasone implant is an important therapeutic tool for ME secondary to retinal vein occlusions. In this series, cataract progression was negligible, though 83% of our patients were phakic. The IOP elevation, observed in 30% of patients, was readily managed with antihypertensive drops.
id RCAP_b656395f77dd4ab51ed1d4819593424b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/7498
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusionArtigos OriginaisPurpose: To assess the safety of the dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusions. Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with ME secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) from January 2011 through August 2015. Safety assessment included analysis of cataract progression, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) changes, antihypertensive eye drops requirement and/or glaucoma surgery. Results: Twenty-four eyes (24 patients) were included in the study, 58% female. Mean age was 66.5 years (49 – 95 years). Thirteen BRVO and 11 CRVO were treated in this series. 75% had history of previous treatment (laser, intravitreal injections or vitrectomy). In six patients (25%) the implant was used as first-line therapy. Twenty patients (83.0%) were phakic in the beginning of the study. Cataract progression was observed in two patients, though none required cataract surgery. Ocular hypertension (IOP>21mmHg) was documented in seven patients (29.1%) following treatment and control was reached with antihypertensive eye drops. A mean 3.53 mmHg elevation of IOP wasn’t statistically significant. The subgroup analysis of BRVO and CRVO did not detect differences in the following parameters: cataract progression, cataract surgery, IOP elevation and hypotensive drug requirement. Conclusions: The dexamethasone implant is an important therapeutic tool for ME secondary to retinal vein occlusions. In this series, cataract progression was negligible, though 83% of our patients were phakic. The IOP elevation, observed in 30% of patients, was readily managed with antihypertensive drops.Ajnet2016-04-29T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.7498eng1646-69501646-6950Gouveia, Petrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-22T17:05:55Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/7498Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:01:35.386905Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
title Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
spellingShingle Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
Gouveia, Petra
Artigos Originais
title_short Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
title_full Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
title_fullStr Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
title_sort Safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion
author Gouveia, Petra
author_facet Gouveia, Petra
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gouveia, Petra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigos Originais
topic Artigos Originais
description Purpose: To assess the safety of the dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusions. Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with ME secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) from January 2011 through August 2015. Safety assessment included analysis of cataract progression, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) changes, antihypertensive eye drops requirement and/or glaucoma surgery. Results: Twenty-four eyes (24 patients) were included in the study, 58% female. Mean age was 66.5 years (49 – 95 years). Thirteen BRVO and 11 CRVO were treated in this series. 75% had history of previous treatment (laser, intravitreal injections or vitrectomy). In six patients (25%) the implant was used as first-line therapy. Twenty patients (83.0%) were phakic in the beginning of the study. Cataract progression was observed in two patients, though none required cataract surgery. Ocular hypertension (IOP>21mmHg) was documented in seven patients (29.1%) following treatment and control was reached with antihypertensive eye drops. A mean 3.53 mmHg elevation of IOP wasn’t statistically significant. The subgroup analysis of BRVO and CRVO did not detect differences in the following parameters: cataract progression, cataract surgery, IOP elevation and hypotensive drug requirement. Conclusions: The dexamethasone implant is an important therapeutic tool for ME secondary to retinal vein occlusions. In this series, cataract progression was negligible, though 83% of our patients were phakic. The IOP elevation, observed in 30% of patients, was readily managed with antihypertensive drops.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-29T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.7498
url https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.7498
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1646-6950
1646-6950
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ajnet
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ajnet
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130481148559360