Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Biscaia, André
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Amorim, Pedro, Esteves, Simão, Lagarto, Filipa, Gomes, Blandina, Bismarck, José, Rodrigues, Nuno, Nogueira, Mafalda, Royse, Colin F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451
Resumo: Introduction: The Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale is a brief instrument of six domains designed to assess quality of recovery from early to long term after surgery. This study aims to validate the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.Material and Methods: In this observational study 101 adult patients undergoing elective surgery completed the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale at 15 minutes and 40 minutes, one and three days after surgery. Three constructs were assessed for validity: increased recovery over time; effect of gender and recovery association with muscle strength. Reliability, responsiveness, feasibility and acceptability were also assessed.Results: Construct validity was shown by increased recovery over time; worse recovery for female patients in emotive, nociceptive, activities of daily living and overall recovery; improved muscle strength in recovered patients. Internal consistency for activities of daily living was acceptable at all-time points (Cronbach’s α value of 0.772 or higher), indicating scale reliability. The scale was able to detect differences in postoperative quality of recovery between the neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, neostigmine and sugammadex, indicating scale responsiveness. The time to conduct the Portuguese version at baseline was 95 - 581 seconds (median 319 seconds) and it was reduced with subsequent assessments. The proportion of patients completing all scale items was 87%, 75%, 65% and 94% for the four time periods evaluated, indicating scale feasibility and acceptability.Discussion: This study shows that the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, demonstrates construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, feasibility and acceptability.Conclusions: This study allowed validation of the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.
id RCAP_b672ade6561f04cf91cfa491a7d96d93
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9451
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)Validação da Versão Portuguesa da Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória (PostopQRS)Anesthesia Recovery PeriodNeuropsychological TestsPortugalPostoperative PeriodRecovery of FunctionSurveys and QuestionnaireInquéritos e QuestionáriosPeríodo de Recuperação da AnestesiaPortugalPeríodo Pós-OperatórioRecuperação de Função FisiológicaTestes NeuropsicológicosIntroduction: The Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale is a brief instrument of six domains designed to assess quality of recovery from early to long term after surgery. This study aims to validate the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.Material and Methods: In this observational study 101 adult patients undergoing elective surgery completed the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale at 15 minutes and 40 minutes, one and three days after surgery. Three constructs were assessed for validity: increased recovery over time; effect of gender and recovery association with muscle strength. Reliability, responsiveness, feasibility and acceptability were also assessed.Results: Construct validity was shown by increased recovery over time; worse recovery for female patients in emotive, nociceptive, activities of daily living and overall recovery; improved muscle strength in recovered patients. Internal consistency for activities of daily living was acceptable at all-time points (Cronbach’s α value of 0.772 or higher), indicating scale reliability. The scale was able to detect differences in postoperative quality of recovery between the neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, neostigmine and sugammadex, indicating scale responsiveness. The time to conduct the Portuguese version at baseline was 95 - 581 seconds (median 319 seconds) and it was reduced with subsequent assessments. The proportion of patients completing all scale items was 87%, 75%, 65% and 94% for the four time periods evaluated, indicating scale feasibility and acceptability.Discussion: This study shows that the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, demonstrates construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, feasibility and acceptability.Conclusions: This study allowed validation of the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.Introdução: A Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória é um instrumento de seis domínios, desenhada para avaliar a qualidade da recuperação no período pós-operatório precoce e tardio. Este estudo teve como objetivo validar a versão portuguesa da Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória.Material e Métodos: Neste estudo observacional foi obtida uma amostra de 101 doentes adultos submetidos a cirurgia eletiva e que preencheu a Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória aos 15 e 40 minutos, um e três dias após a cirurgia. Três teorias foram avaliadas para aferir a validade teórica da escala: aumento da recuperação ao longo do tempo, efeito do género e a associação da recuperação com a força muscular. Foram também avaliadas a fiabilidade, poder de resposta, viabilidade e aceitabilidade.Resultados: A validade teórica foi demonstrada pelo aumento da recuperação ao longo do tempo, assim como uma pior recuperação para doentes do sexo feminino em atividades emotivas, nociceptivas, diárias e de recuperação geral. Detetou-se ainda uma melhoria da força muscular em doentes recuperados. A coerência interna no domínio das atividades da vida diária foi aceitável em todos os tempos (valor α de Cronbach de 0,772 ou superior), indicando a fiabilidade da escala. Com esta escala foi possível detetar diferenças na qualidade pós-operatória da recuperação entre os agentes de reversão de bloqueio neuromuscular, a neostigmina e o sugammadex, indicando que a escala apresenta poder de resposta. O tempo para aplicar a versão portuguesa no período inicial (baseline) foi de 95 - 581 segundos (mediana 319 segundos) com uma diminuição em avaliações subsequentes. A proporção de doentes que completaram todos os itens da escala foi de 87%, 75%, 65% e 94% nos quatro períodos avaliados, indicando viabilidade e aceitabilidade da escala.Discussão: A versão portuguesa da Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória demonstrou ter validade, fiabilidade, poder de resposta, viabilidade e aceitabilidade.Conclusões: Este estudo permitiu a validação da versão Portuguesa da Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória.Ordem dos Médicos2018-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/x-ms-bmpimage/x-ms-bmpimage/x-ms-bmpimage/x-ms-bmpimage/x-ms-bmpapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9451Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 No. 10 (2018): October; 551-561Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 N.º 10 (2018): Outubro; 551-5611646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/5528https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/5508https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9513https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9514https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9515https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9516https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9517https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9835https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/10614Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBiscaia, AndréAmorim, PedroEsteves, SimãoLagarto, FilipaGomes, BlandinaBismarck, JoséRodrigues, NunoNogueira, MafaldaRoyse, Colin F.2022-12-20T11:05:45ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
Validação da Versão Portuguesa da Escala da Qualidade da Recuperação Pós-Operatória (PostopQRS)
title Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
spellingShingle Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
Biscaia, André
Anesthesia Recovery Period
Neuropsychological Tests
Portugal
Postoperative Period
Recovery of Function
Surveys and Questionnaire
Inquéritos e Questionários
Período de Recuperação da Anestesia
Portugal
Período Pós-Operatório
Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
Testes Neuropsicológicos
title_short Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
title_full Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
title_fullStr Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
title_sort Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PostopQRS)
author Biscaia, André
author_facet Biscaia, André
Amorim, Pedro
Esteves, Simão
Lagarto, Filipa
Gomes, Blandina
Bismarck, José
Rodrigues, Nuno
Nogueira, Mafalda
Royse, Colin F.
author_role author
author2 Amorim, Pedro
Esteves, Simão
Lagarto, Filipa
Gomes, Blandina
Bismarck, José
Rodrigues, Nuno
Nogueira, Mafalda
Royse, Colin F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Biscaia, André
Amorim, Pedro
Esteves, Simão
Lagarto, Filipa
Gomes, Blandina
Bismarck, José
Rodrigues, Nuno
Nogueira, Mafalda
Royse, Colin F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anesthesia Recovery Period
Neuropsychological Tests
Portugal
Postoperative Period
Recovery of Function
Surveys and Questionnaire
Inquéritos e Questionários
Período de Recuperação da Anestesia
Portugal
Período Pós-Operatório
Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
Testes Neuropsicológicos
topic Anesthesia Recovery Period
Neuropsychological Tests
Portugal
Postoperative Period
Recovery of Function
Surveys and Questionnaire
Inquéritos e Questionários
Período de Recuperação da Anestesia
Portugal
Período Pós-Operatório
Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
Testes Neuropsicológicos
description Introduction: The Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale is a brief instrument of six domains designed to assess quality of recovery from early to long term after surgery. This study aims to validate the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.Material and Methods: In this observational study 101 adult patients undergoing elective surgery completed the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale at 15 minutes and 40 minutes, one and three days after surgery. Three constructs were assessed for validity: increased recovery over time; effect of gender and recovery association with muscle strength. Reliability, responsiveness, feasibility and acceptability were also assessed.Results: Construct validity was shown by increased recovery over time; worse recovery for female patients in emotive, nociceptive, activities of daily living and overall recovery; improved muscle strength in recovered patients. Internal consistency for activities of daily living was acceptable at all-time points (Cronbach’s α value of 0.772 or higher), indicating scale reliability. The scale was able to detect differences in postoperative quality of recovery between the neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, neostigmine and sugammadex, indicating scale responsiveness. The time to conduct the Portuguese version at baseline was 95 - 581 seconds (median 319 seconds) and it was reduced with subsequent assessments. The proportion of patients completing all scale items was 87%, 75%, 65% and 94% for the four time periods evaluated, indicating scale feasibility and acceptability.Discussion: This study shows that the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, demonstrates construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, feasibility and acceptability.Conclusions: This study allowed validation of the Portuguese version of the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9451
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9451
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/5528
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/5508
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9513
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9514
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9515
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9516
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9517
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/9835
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9451/10614
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
image/x-ms-bmp
image/x-ms-bmp
image/x-ms-bmp
image/x-ms-bmp
image/x-ms-bmp
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 No. 10 (2018): October; 551-561
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 N.º 10 (2018): Outubro; 551-561
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301650726191104