South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16662 |
Resumo: | South–South relations have regained widespread interest in recent years, together with increasingly visible stances on international stages. Brazil’s interactions with the African continent, in particular, came to epitomise such a perception while sustaining an expectation of mutual alignment in several global issues. However, these assumptions still lack empirical corroboration. Drawing on United Nations General Assembly voting data for the 1991–2013 timeframe, this article questions a supposed South–South solidarity at the multilateral institution with the largest global representation and identifies key thematic axes that incite greater collective stances. The analysis further sheds light on whether or not a common South–South agenda has emerged over time. |
id |
RCAP_b6bb7f88d5ac3f53d40011923ff708b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/16662 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General AssemblyBrasilÁfricaAGNURelações Sul-SulSouth–South relations have regained widespread interest in recent years, together with increasingly visible stances on international stages. Brazil’s interactions with the African continent, in particular, came to epitomise such a perception while sustaining an expectation of mutual alignment in several global issues. However, these assumptions still lack empirical corroboration. Drawing on United Nations General Assembly voting data for the 1991–2013 timeframe, this article questions a supposed South–South solidarity at the multilateral institution with the largest global representation and identifies key thematic axes that incite greater collective stances. The analysis further sheds light on whether or not a common South–South agenda has emerged over time.Springer2018-10-15T09:12:43Z2019-10-15T00:00:00Z2019-01-01T00:00:00Z20192019-02-01T14:43:38Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/16662eng1384-574810.1057/s41311-018-0170-0Seabra, P.Sanches, E. R.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:31:47Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/16662Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:14:18.645872Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
title |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
spellingShingle |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly Seabra, P. Brasil África AGNU Relações Sul-Sul |
title_short |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
title_full |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
title_fullStr |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
title_full_unstemmed |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
title_sort |
South–South cohesiveness versus South–South rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly |
author |
Seabra, P. |
author_facet |
Seabra, P. Sanches, E. R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sanches, E. R. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Seabra, P. Sanches, E. R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brasil África AGNU Relações Sul-Sul |
topic |
Brasil África AGNU Relações Sul-Sul |
description |
South–South relations have regained widespread interest in recent years, together with increasingly visible stances on international stages. Brazil’s interactions with the African continent, in particular, came to epitomise such a perception while sustaining an expectation of mutual alignment in several global issues. However, these assumptions still lack empirical corroboration. Drawing on United Nations General Assembly voting data for the 1991–2013 timeframe, this article questions a supposed South–South solidarity at the multilateral institution with the largest global representation and identifies key thematic axes that incite greater collective stances. The analysis further sheds light on whether or not a common South–South agenda has emerged over time. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-15T09:12:43Z 2019-10-15T00:00:00Z 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z 2019 2019-02-01T14:43:38Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16662 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16662 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1384-5748 10.1057/s41311-018-0170-0 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134700215730176 |