A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monnerat, Rafaela
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31008
Resumo: This dissertation has as its objective to make a comparative analysis between on-site work to the new and ascending work models, Remote and Hybrid. These models of work have become a reality across the world after the outburst of the Pandemic of Covid-19. Even after the Pandemic was contained, many companies around the globe kept the new models of work as a new reality. There are still a lot of divergent ideas and very little time with the new reality, to have definitive opinions about the positive and negative aspects of on-site work, Remote work, and Hybrid work models. To compare the different work models, this research analyzes a wide selection of articles that approach the subject and present different views and data about it. Based on the literature and research, hypothesis and research questions were created to build a survey. The survey was done with a sample of 80 individuals, the majority in Portugal and Brazil. Based on it, it was possible to analyze the opinion of many employees and employers that work in different models and evaluate the different opinions about them. With the questionnaire and analysis of the results, it was possible to conclude that in a general framework, remote and hybrid work is dominating the labor market in the realities of the individuals in the sample, the positive aspects are greater than the negative ones and the workers mostly prefer to work in the new work models, and believe that they will be part of the future.
id RCAP_b6c206d0328324a55fbe3c19bd8af1a5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/31008
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote workPandemia -- PandemicCOVID-19Remote workHybrid modelInovação -- InnovationFlexibilityAdaptabilityBenefitsTrabalho remotoModelo híbridoFlexibilidadeAdaptabilidadeBenefíciosThis dissertation has as its objective to make a comparative analysis between on-site work to the new and ascending work models, Remote and Hybrid. These models of work have become a reality across the world after the outburst of the Pandemic of Covid-19. Even after the Pandemic was contained, many companies around the globe kept the new models of work as a new reality. There are still a lot of divergent ideas and very little time with the new reality, to have definitive opinions about the positive and negative aspects of on-site work, Remote work, and Hybrid work models. To compare the different work models, this research analyzes a wide selection of articles that approach the subject and present different views and data about it. Based on the literature and research, hypothesis and research questions were created to build a survey. The survey was done with a sample of 80 individuals, the majority in Portugal and Brazil. Based on it, it was possible to analyze the opinion of many employees and employers that work in different models and evaluate the different opinions about them. With the questionnaire and analysis of the results, it was possible to conclude that in a general framework, remote and hybrid work is dominating the labor market in the realities of the individuals in the sample, the positive aspects are greater than the negative ones and the workers mostly prefer to work in the new work models, and believe that they will be part of the future.Esta dissertação tem como objectivo fazer uma análise comparativa entre trabalhar no escritório e as novas e crescentes formas de trabalho, remoto e híbrido. O qual virou uma realidade para a maioria ao redor do mundo, após a Pandemia do Covid-19. Mesmo após a pandemia ter sido contida, muitas empresas continuam ou passaram a adotar os métodos de trabalho remoto e híbrido. Contudo, ainda existem muitas opiniões divergentes e muito pouco tempo da nova realidade, para podermos nos posicionar sobre os pontos positivos e negativos do trabalho remoto e híbrido de uma forma definitiva. Com o objetivo de comparar os modelos de trabalho esta pesquisa analisa uma vasta seleção de artigos que abordam o assunto e apresentam diferentes visões e dados sobre o mesmo. Com base na literatura selecionada e pesquisas, foram criadas hipótesis e questões de pesquisa para criar um questionário. O questionário foi feito com uma amostra de 80 indivíduos localizados em Portugal e no Brasil maioritariamente. Com base neste questionário, foi possível analisar opiniões de indivíduos no mercado de trabalho e que trabalham em diferentes modelos e suas opiniões sobre os mesmos. Com o questionário e análises dos resultados, foi possível concluir que em um quadro geral o trabalho remoto e híbrido está dominando o mercado de trabalho nas realidades dos indivíduos da amostra, os aspectos positivos são maiores que os negativos e os trabalhadores preferem maioritariamente trabalhar nos novos modelos de trabalho e acreditam que os mesmos vão ser parte do futuro.2024-02-14T15:25:28Z2023-12-20T00:00:00Z2023-12-202023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/31008TID:203483391engMonnerat, Rafaelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-18T01:17:31Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/31008Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:38:41.636833Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
title A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
spellingShingle A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
Monnerat, Rafaela
Pandemia -- Pandemic
COVID-19
Remote work
Hybrid model
Inovação -- Innovation
Flexibility
Adaptability
Benefits
Trabalho remoto
Modelo híbrido
Flexibilidade
Adaptabilidade
Benefícios
title_short A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
title_full A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
title_fullStr A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
title_sort A comparative analysis between on-site work, hybrid work, and remote work
author Monnerat, Rafaela
author_facet Monnerat, Rafaela
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monnerat, Rafaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pandemia -- Pandemic
COVID-19
Remote work
Hybrid model
Inovação -- Innovation
Flexibility
Adaptability
Benefits
Trabalho remoto
Modelo híbrido
Flexibilidade
Adaptabilidade
Benefícios
topic Pandemia -- Pandemic
COVID-19
Remote work
Hybrid model
Inovação -- Innovation
Flexibility
Adaptability
Benefits
Trabalho remoto
Modelo híbrido
Flexibilidade
Adaptabilidade
Benefícios
description This dissertation has as its objective to make a comparative analysis between on-site work to the new and ascending work models, Remote and Hybrid. These models of work have become a reality across the world after the outburst of the Pandemic of Covid-19. Even after the Pandemic was contained, many companies around the globe kept the new models of work as a new reality. There are still a lot of divergent ideas and very little time with the new reality, to have definitive opinions about the positive and negative aspects of on-site work, Remote work, and Hybrid work models. To compare the different work models, this research analyzes a wide selection of articles that approach the subject and present different views and data about it. Based on the literature and research, hypothesis and research questions were created to build a survey. The survey was done with a sample of 80 individuals, the majority in Portugal and Brazil. Based on it, it was possible to analyze the opinion of many employees and employers that work in different models and evaluate the different opinions about them. With the questionnaire and analysis of the results, it was possible to conclude that in a general framework, remote and hybrid work is dominating the labor market in the realities of the individuals in the sample, the positive aspects are greater than the negative ones and the workers mostly prefer to work in the new work models, and believe that they will be part of the future.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-20T00:00:00Z
2023-12-20
2023-09
2024-02-14T15:25:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31008
TID:203483391
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31008
identifier_str_mv TID:203483391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137437624041472