Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morgan, Kevin
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Webb, Brian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520
Resumo: Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.
id RCAP_b709c79a7413d59df8d5d9bb0c2cd899
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ WaterfrontGoogle; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planningToronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.Cogitatio2020-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520Urban Planning; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics; 84-952183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520/2520Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Morgan, Brian Webbhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorgan, KevinWebb, Brian2022-12-20T10:59:24Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:40.860361Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
title Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
spellingShingle Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
Morgan, Kevin
Google; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planning
title_short Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
title_full Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
title_fullStr Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
title_full_unstemmed Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
title_sort Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
author Morgan, Kevin
author_facet Morgan, Kevin
Webb, Brian
author_role author
author2 Webb, Brian
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morgan, Kevin
Webb, Brian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Google; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planning
topic Google; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planning
description Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520/2520
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Morgan, Brian Webb
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Morgan, Brian Webb
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics; 84-95
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130663618609152