Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520 |
Resumo: | Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities. |
id |
RCAP_b709c79a7413d59df8d5d9bb0c2cd899 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ WaterfrontGoogle; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planningToronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.Cogitatio2020-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520Urban Planning; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics; 84-952183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520/2520Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Morgan, Brian Webbhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorgan, KevinWebb, Brian2022-12-20T10:59:24Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:40.860361Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
title |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
spellingShingle |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront Morgan, Kevin Google; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planning |
title_short |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
title_full |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
title_fullStr |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
title_full_unstemmed |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
title_sort |
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
author |
Morgan, Kevin |
author_facet |
Morgan, Kevin Webb, Brian |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Webb, Brian |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morgan, Kevin Webb, Brian |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Google; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planning |
topic |
Google; public interest; Quayside; Sidewalk Labs; smart city; smart urbanism; Toronto; urban planning |
description |
Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2520 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2520/2520 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Morgan, Brian Webb http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Morgan, Brian Webb http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Urban Planning; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics; 84-95 2183-7635 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130663618609152 |