Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lawrence, Roderick J.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674
Resumo: Synergies between urban planning and public health were synthesized a decade ago by the Lancet Commission’s article “Shaping Cities for Health: Complexity and the Planning of Urban Environments in the 21st Century.” Since then, innovative research projects, urban planning projects, and accumulated experience from the World Health Organization Healthy Cities project confirm that transdisciplinary contributions enable the achievement of core principles of healthy cities. This article clarifies important differences between the content, scope, and outcomes of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary projects about public health and urban planning. It explains why transdisciplinary contributions are more likely to bridge the applicability gap between knowledge and practice in response to persistent urban health challenges; notably, they transgress the boundaries of public health and medical science; they prioritize political action in both the formal and informal construction sectors; and they include citizens, community associations, and private enterprises as partners in consortia for concerted action. This article proposes a radical shift from incremental, reactive, and corrective approaches in planning for urban health to proactive and anticipative contributions using backcasting and alternative scenarios that prioritize health. The article uses the case of public green spaces in planning for urban health. It identifies the shortcomings of many empirical studies that are meant to promote and sustain health before describing and illustrating an alternative way forward.
id RCAP_b88cc7c78c98e744b0cbf497f6f0713f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5674
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Citiesapplicability gap; co-benefits; healthy cities; transdisciplinary projects; urban planning for healthSynergies between urban planning and public health were synthesized a decade ago by the Lancet Commission’s article “Shaping Cities for Health: Complexity and the Planning of Urban Environments in the 21st Century.” Since then, innovative research projects, urban planning projects, and accumulated experience from the World Health Organization Healthy Cities project confirm that transdisciplinary contributions enable the achievement of core principles of healthy cities. This article clarifies important differences between the content, scope, and outcomes of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary projects about public health and urban planning. It explains why transdisciplinary contributions are more likely to bridge the applicability gap between knowledge and practice in response to persistent urban health challenges; notably, they transgress the boundaries of public health and medical science; they prioritize political action in both the formal and informal construction sectors; and they include citizens, community associations, and private enterprises as partners in consortia for concerted action. This article proposes a radical shift from incremental, reactive, and corrective approaches in planning for urban health to proactive and anticipative contributions using backcasting and alternative scenarios that prioritize health. The article uses the case of public green spaces in planning for urban health. It identifies the shortcomings of many empirical studies that are meant to promote and sustain health before describing and illustrating an alternative way forward.Cogitatio2022-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5674Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 4 (2022): Healthy Cities: Effective Urban Planning Approaches to a Changing World; 61-742183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5674https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5674/5674Copyright (c) 2022 Roderick J. Lawrenceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLawrence, Roderick J.2022-12-20T11:00:09Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5674Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:05.617436Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
title Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
spellingShingle Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
Lawrence, Roderick J.
applicability gap; co-benefits; healthy cities; transdisciplinary projects; urban planning for health
title_short Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
title_full Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
title_fullStr Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
title_full_unstemmed Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
title_sort Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities
author Lawrence, Roderick J.
author_facet Lawrence, Roderick J.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lawrence, Roderick J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv applicability gap; co-benefits; healthy cities; transdisciplinary projects; urban planning for health
topic applicability gap; co-benefits; healthy cities; transdisciplinary projects; urban planning for health
description Synergies between urban planning and public health were synthesized a decade ago by the Lancet Commission’s article “Shaping Cities for Health: Complexity and the Planning of Urban Environments in the 21st Century.” Since then, innovative research projects, urban planning projects, and accumulated experience from the World Health Organization Healthy Cities project confirm that transdisciplinary contributions enable the achievement of core principles of healthy cities. This article clarifies important differences between the content, scope, and outcomes of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary projects about public health and urban planning. It explains why transdisciplinary contributions are more likely to bridge the applicability gap between knowledge and practice in response to persistent urban health challenges; notably, they transgress the boundaries of public health and medical science; they prioritize political action in both the formal and informal construction sectors; and they include citizens, community associations, and private enterprises as partners in consortia for concerted action. This article proposes a radical shift from incremental, reactive, and corrective approaches in planning for urban health to proactive and anticipative contributions using backcasting and alternative scenarios that prioritize health. The article uses the case of public green spaces in planning for urban health. It identifies the shortcomings of many empirical studies that are meant to promote and sustain health before describing and illustrating an alternative way forward.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5674
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5674
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5674
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5674/5674
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Roderick J. Lawrence
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Roderick J. Lawrence
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 4 (2022): Healthy Cities: Effective Urban Planning Approaches to a Changing World; 61-74
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130667243536384