Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hoppe, Alexander
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Thorlakson, Lori, Gómez, Johannes Müller
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569
Resumo: In the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises.
id RCAP_b8913513ca01d5ccf7bea0fd8a297805
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7569
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and CanadaCanada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studiesIn the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises.Cogitatio Press2023-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 226-2302183-246310.17645/pag.i360reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569/3430Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Hoppe, Lori Thorlakson, Johannes Müller Gómezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHoppe, AlexanderThorlakson, LoriGómez, Johannes Müller2023-11-23T15:15:19Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7569Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:38.306892Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
title Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
spellingShingle Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
Hoppe, Alexander
Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies
title_short Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
title_full Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
title_fullStr Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
title_full_unstemmed Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
title_sort Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
author Hoppe, Alexander
author_facet Hoppe, Alexander
Thorlakson, Lori
Gómez, Johannes Müller
author_role author
author2 Thorlakson, Lori
Gómez, Johannes Müller
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hoppe, Alexander
Thorlakson, Lori
Gómez, Johannes Müller
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies
topic Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies
description In the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569/3430
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Hoppe, Lori Thorlakson, Johannes Müller Gómez
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Hoppe, Lori Thorlakson, Johannes Müller Gómez
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 226-230
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i360
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133584099901440