Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569 |
Resumo: | In the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises. |
id |
RCAP_b8913513ca01d5ccf7bea0fd8a297805 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7569 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and CanadaCanada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studiesIn the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises.Cogitatio Press2023-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 226-2302183-246310.17645/pag.i360reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569/3430Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Hoppe, Lori Thorlakson, Johannes Müller Gómezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHoppe, AlexanderThorlakson, LoriGómez, Johannes Müller2023-11-23T15:15:19Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7569Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:38.306892Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
title |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
spellingShingle |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada Hoppe, Alexander Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies Hoppe, Alexander Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies |
title_short |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
title_full |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
title_fullStr |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
title_sort |
Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada |
author |
Hoppe, Alexander |
author_facet |
Hoppe, Alexander Hoppe, Alexander Thorlakson, Lori Gómez, Johannes Müller Thorlakson, Lori Gómez, Johannes Müller |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Thorlakson, Lori Gómez, Johannes Müller |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hoppe, Alexander Thorlakson, Lori Gómez, Johannes Müller |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies |
topic |
Canada; comparative politics; comparative turn; EU; EU studies |
description |
In the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569/3430 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Hoppe, Lori Thorlakson, Johannes Müller Gómez info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Hoppe, Lori Thorlakson, Johannes Müller Gómez |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 226-230 2183-2463 10.17645/pag.i360 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822183372947980288 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17645/pag.v11i3.7569 |