Lightweight skins for UAV wings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Correia, Rodrigo Barata
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/13770
Resumo: This work investigates different production methods and the mechanical and elastic behavior of composite sandwich structures under bending stress. Fiber cloth materials like carbon fiber and core materials like Airex foam, balsa wood, and honeycomb structures are analyzed in different layups both experimentally and computationally. The main objective of this study is to identify which composite sandwich has better mechanical properties and can be used as a lightweight structure for the wing skin of small airplanes like UAVs. For that, a three-point bending test was performed and followed by a structural analysis simulation in ANSYS® to validate the results obtained. The samples tested have a relatively low thickness in order to be suitable for small UAVs (less than 2.5 mm). All of the samples were produced with two layers of a lightweight 30 g/m2 carbon fiber cloth on each side of the sandwich and a core material. The balsa wood sandwich was the most weight-efficient sample with a strength per unit of mass of 11.49 N/g and also the most rigid with a flexural modulus of 3.18 GP a. The AIREX® C 70.75 foam sandwich was the least weight efficient sample with a strength per unit of mass of 5.91 N/g and also the least rigid with a flexural modulus of 0.86 GP a. The Nomex® honeycomb core sandwich oriented in the lengthwise and widthwise direction had a strength per unit of mass of 9.62 N/g and 9.11 N/g and a flexural modulus of 1.00 GP a and 1.08 GP a respectively. Even though the finite element analysis results were not satisfactory, the experimental procedures and experiments were successfully performed and enough data was collected in order to take reliable conclusions concerning the use of the most adequate lightweight sandwich structure for UAV wings with the balsa wood sandwich being the one with the better overall performance.
id RCAP_b9fe1ca49cede9472c3da5a7632b1750
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/13770
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Lightweight skins for UAV wingsCascas LevesFeaFibra de CarbonoFlexão em Três PontosRigidez à FlexãoSanduíche em CompósitoUavDomínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia AeronáuticaThis work investigates different production methods and the mechanical and elastic behavior of composite sandwich structures under bending stress. Fiber cloth materials like carbon fiber and core materials like Airex foam, balsa wood, and honeycomb structures are analyzed in different layups both experimentally and computationally. The main objective of this study is to identify which composite sandwich has better mechanical properties and can be used as a lightweight structure for the wing skin of small airplanes like UAVs. For that, a three-point bending test was performed and followed by a structural analysis simulation in ANSYS® to validate the results obtained. The samples tested have a relatively low thickness in order to be suitable for small UAVs (less than 2.5 mm). All of the samples were produced with two layers of a lightweight 30 g/m2 carbon fiber cloth on each side of the sandwich and a core material. The balsa wood sandwich was the most weight-efficient sample with a strength per unit of mass of 11.49 N/g and also the most rigid with a flexural modulus of 3.18 GP a. The AIREX® C 70.75 foam sandwich was the least weight efficient sample with a strength per unit of mass of 5.91 N/g and also the least rigid with a flexural modulus of 0.86 GP a. The Nomex® honeycomb core sandwich oriented in the lengthwise and widthwise direction had a strength per unit of mass of 9.62 N/g and 9.11 N/g and a flexural modulus of 1.00 GP a and 1.08 GP a respectively. Even though the finite element analysis results were not satisfactory, the experimental procedures and experiments were successfully performed and enough data was collected in order to take reliable conclusions concerning the use of the most adequate lightweight sandwich structure for UAV wings with the balsa wood sandwich being the one with the better overall performance.Este trabalho investiga diferentes métodos de produção e o comportamento mecânico e elástico de estruturas de sanduíche em compósito sob esforços de flexão. Materiais de tecido de fibra como fibra de carbono e materiais de núcleo como espuma Airex, madeira de balsa e estruturas de favo de mel são analisados em diferentes configurações, tanto experimentalmente quanto computacionalmente. O principal objetivo deste estudo é identificar qual a sanduíche em compósito que possui melhores propriedades mecânicas e pode ser usada nas cascas de asas para aviões de pequenas dimensões como UAVs. Para isso, foi realizado um ensaio de flexão em três pontos, seguido de uma simulação estrutural em ANSYS® para validar os resultados obtidos. As amostras testadas têm uma espessura relativamente baixa para serem adequadas para pequenos UAVs (menos de 2.5 mm). Todas as amostras foram produzidas com duas camadas de tecido de fibra de carbono com 30 g/m2 em cada lado da sanduíche e um material de núcleo. A sanduíche de madeira de balsa foi a amostra mais eficiente com uma resistência por unidade de massa de 11.49 N/g e também a mais rígida com um módulo de flexão de 3.18 GP a. A sanduíche de espuma AIREX® C 70.75 foi a amostra com menor eficiência com uma resistência por unidade de massa de 5.91 N/g e também a menos rígida com um módulo de flexão de 0.86 GP a. A sanduíche de Nomex® honeycomb orientado na direção longitudinal e transversal tinham uma resistência por unidade de massa de 9.62 N/g e 9.11 N/g e um módulo de flexão de 1.00 GP a e 1.08 GP a respectivamente. Embora os resultados da análise de elementos finitos não tenham sido satisfatórios, os procedimentos experimentais e as experiências foram realizadas com sucesso e dados suficientes foram coletados para tirar conclusões confiáveis sobre o uso da estruturas de sanduíche em compósito mais adequada para asas de UAV, sendo a sanduíche de madeira de balsa a com o melhor desempenho no geral.Gamboa, Pedro VieirauBibliorumCorreia, Rodrigo Barata2023-11-23T11:27:43Z2023-07-122023-06-062023-07-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/13770TID:203390210enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-15T09:57:29Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/13770Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:53:08.233637Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lightweight skins for UAV wings
title Lightweight skins for UAV wings
spellingShingle Lightweight skins for UAV wings
Correia, Rodrigo Barata
Cascas Leves
Fea
Fibra de Carbono
Flexão em Três Pontos
Rigidez à Flexão
Sanduíche em Compósito
Uav
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Aeronáutica
title_short Lightweight skins for UAV wings
title_full Lightweight skins for UAV wings
title_fullStr Lightweight skins for UAV wings
title_full_unstemmed Lightweight skins for UAV wings
title_sort Lightweight skins for UAV wings
author Correia, Rodrigo Barata
author_facet Correia, Rodrigo Barata
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Gamboa, Pedro Vieira
uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Correia, Rodrigo Barata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cascas Leves
Fea
Fibra de Carbono
Flexão em Três Pontos
Rigidez à Flexão
Sanduíche em Compósito
Uav
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Aeronáutica
topic Cascas Leves
Fea
Fibra de Carbono
Flexão em Três Pontos
Rigidez à Flexão
Sanduíche em Compósito
Uav
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Aeronáutica
description This work investigates different production methods and the mechanical and elastic behavior of composite sandwich structures under bending stress. Fiber cloth materials like carbon fiber and core materials like Airex foam, balsa wood, and honeycomb structures are analyzed in different layups both experimentally and computationally. The main objective of this study is to identify which composite sandwich has better mechanical properties and can be used as a lightweight structure for the wing skin of small airplanes like UAVs. For that, a three-point bending test was performed and followed by a structural analysis simulation in ANSYS® to validate the results obtained. The samples tested have a relatively low thickness in order to be suitable for small UAVs (less than 2.5 mm). All of the samples were produced with two layers of a lightweight 30 g/m2 carbon fiber cloth on each side of the sandwich and a core material. The balsa wood sandwich was the most weight-efficient sample with a strength per unit of mass of 11.49 N/g and also the most rigid with a flexural modulus of 3.18 GP a. The AIREX® C 70.75 foam sandwich was the least weight efficient sample with a strength per unit of mass of 5.91 N/g and also the least rigid with a flexural modulus of 0.86 GP a. The Nomex® honeycomb core sandwich oriented in the lengthwise and widthwise direction had a strength per unit of mass of 9.62 N/g and 9.11 N/g and a flexural modulus of 1.00 GP a and 1.08 GP a respectively. Even though the finite element analysis results were not satisfactory, the experimental procedures and experiments were successfully performed and enough data was collected in order to take reliable conclusions concerning the use of the most adequate lightweight sandwich structure for UAV wings with the balsa wood sandwich being the one with the better overall performance.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-23T11:27:43Z
2023-07-12
2023-06-06
2023-07-12T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/13770
TID:203390210
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/13770
identifier_str_mv TID:203390210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136419921264640