Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Breeze, Tom D.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Boreux, Virginie, Cole, Lorna, Dicks, Lynn, Klein, Alexandra‐Maria, Pufal, Gesine, Balzan, Mario V., Bevk, Danilo, Bortolotti, Laura, Petanidou, Theodora, Mand, Marika, Pinto, M. Alice, Scheper, Jeroen, Stanisavljević, Ljubiša, Stavrinides, Menelaos C., Tscheulin, Thomas, Varnava, Androulla, Kleijn, David
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/20967
Resumo: 1. Pollination by insects is a key input into many crops, with managed honeybees often being hired to support pollination services. Despite substantial research into pollination management, no European studies have yet explored how and why farmers managed pollination services and few have explored why beekeepers use certain crops. 2. Using paired surveys of beekeepers and farmers in 10 European countries, this study examines beekeeper and farmer perceptions and motivations surrounding crop pollination. 3. Almost half of the farmers surveyed believed they had pollination service deficits in one or more of their crops. 4. Less than a third of farmers hired managed pollinators; however, most undertook at least one form of agri‐environment management known to benefit pollinators, although few did so to promote pollinators. 5. Beekeepers were ambivalent towards many mass‐flowering crops, with some beekeepers using crops for their honey that other beekeepers avoid because of perceived pesticide risks. 6. The findings highlight a number of largely overlooked knowledge gaps that will affect knowledge exchange and co‐operation between the two groups.
id RCAP_ba2c0a67674c3a5c9b712683d8c71d69
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/20967
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollinationBeekeepingEcosystem servicesPollination servicesRural sociology1. Pollination by insects is a key input into many crops, with managed honeybees often being hired to support pollination services. Despite substantial research into pollination management, no European studies have yet explored how and why farmers managed pollination services and few have explored why beekeepers use certain crops. 2. Using paired surveys of beekeepers and farmers in 10 European countries, this study examines beekeeper and farmer perceptions and motivations surrounding crop pollination. 3. Almost half of the farmers surveyed believed they had pollination service deficits in one or more of their crops. 4. Less than a third of farmers hired managed pollinators; however, most undertook at least one form of agri‐environment management known to benefit pollinators, although few did so to promote pollinators. 5. Beekeepers were ambivalent towards many mass‐flowering crops, with some beekeepers using crops for their honey that other beekeepers avoid because of perceived pesticide risks. 6. The findings highlight a number of largely overlooked knowledge gaps that will affect knowledge exchange and co‐operation between the two groups.Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Grant/Award Number: 841.11.001; Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja, Grant/Award Number: 43001; Natural Environment Research Council, Grant/Award Number: NE/K015419/1 and NE/N014472/1; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, Grant/Award Number: V4‐1622 and P1‐0255; Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division; Bayer Crop Science; European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Grant/Award Number: oc‐2013‐1‐15320; BBSRC, Grant/ Award Number: BB/R00580X/1; The Scottish Government Rural Affairs and the Environment Strategic Research ProgrammeBritish Ecological SocietyBiblioteca Digital do IPBBreeze, Tom D.Boreux, VirginieCole, LornaDicks, LynnKlein, Alexandra‐MariaPufal, GesineBalzan, Mario V.Bevk, DaniloBortolotti, LauraPetanidou, TheodoraMand, MarikaPinto, M. AliceScheper, JeroenStanisavljević, LjubišaStavrinides, Menelaos C.Tscheulin, ThomasVarnava, AndroullaKleijn, David2020-03-13T10:15:50Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/20967eng10.1002/pan3.10055info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:47:28Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/20967Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:12:00.021423Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
title Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
spellingShingle Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
Breeze, Tom D.
Beekeeping
Ecosystem services
Pollination services
Rural sociology
title_short Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
title_full Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
title_fullStr Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
title_full_unstemmed Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
title_sort Linking farmer and beekeeper preferences with ecological knowledge to improve crop pollination
author Breeze, Tom D.
author_facet Breeze, Tom D.
Boreux, Virginie
Cole, Lorna
Dicks, Lynn
Klein, Alexandra‐Maria
Pufal, Gesine
Balzan, Mario V.
Bevk, Danilo
Bortolotti, Laura
Petanidou, Theodora
Mand, Marika
Pinto, M. Alice
Scheper, Jeroen
Stanisavljević, Ljubiša
Stavrinides, Menelaos C.
Tscheulin, Thomas
Varnava, Androulla
Kleijn, David
author_role author
author2 Boreux, Virginie
Cole, Lorna
Dicks, Lynn
Klein, Alexandra‐Maria
Pufal, Gesine
Balzan, Mario V.
Bevk, Danilo
Bortolotti, Laura
Petanidou, Theodora
Mand, Marika
Pinto, M. Alice
Scheper, Jeroen
Stanisavljević, Ljubiša
Stavrinides, Menelaos C.
Tscheulin, Thomas
Varnava, Androulla
Kleijn, David
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Breeze, Tom D.
Boreux, Virginie
Cole, Lorna
Dicks, Lynn
Klein, Alexandra‐Maria
Pufal, Gesine
Balzan, Mario V.
Bevk, Danilo
Bortolotti, Laura
Petanidou, Theodora
Mand, Marika
Pinto, M. Alice
Scheper, Jeroen
Stanisavljević, Ljubiša
Stavrinides, Menelaos C.
Tscheulin, Thomas
Varnava, Androulla
Kleijn, David
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beekeeping
Ecosystem services
Pollination services
Rural sociology
topic Beekeeping
Ecosystem services
Pollination services
Rural sociology
description 1. Pollination by insects is a key input into many crops, with managed honeybees often being hired to support pollination services. Despite substantial research into pollination management, no European studies have yet explored how and why farmers managed pollination services and few have explored why beekeepers use certain crops. 2. Using paired surveys of beekeepers and farmers in 10 European countries, this study examines beekeeper and farmer perceptions and motivations surrounding crop pollination. 3. Almost half of the farmers surveyed believed they had pollination service deficits in one or more of their crops. 4. Less than a third of farmers hired managed pollinators; however, most undertook at least one form of agri‐environment management known to benefit pollinators, although few did so to promote pollinators. 5. Beekeepers were ambivalent towards many mass‐flowering crops, with some beekeepers using crops for their honey that other beekeepers avoid because of perceived pesticide risks. 6. The findings highlight a number of largely overlooked knowledge gaps that will affect knowledge exchange and co‐operation between the two groups.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-03-13T10:15:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/20967
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/20967
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/pan3.10055
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv British Ecological Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv British Ecological Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135390621237248