Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Blondeel, Paul, Vandevoordt, Robin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32
Resumo: Recent theoretical discussions have indicated that citizenship is not only a way of being, but also a way of behaving. This article aims to show how attempts to regulate the behaviour of the citizenry can introduce a new topography of inclusion and exclusion, thereby exercising a direct effect on particular ethnic minorities. We investigate the issue in Antwerp, the largest city of the Flemish Region in Belgium. With his slogan ‘Antwerp belongs to everyone’ former mayor Patrick Janssens gained significant international attention for Antwerp’s supposedly inclusive conception of urban citizenship. In this article, we argue that the universality of Antwerp’s city slogan has nevertheless veiled the introduction of new exclusionary prescriptions centred around citizens’ conduct. Drawing on a Foucauldian account of power, three different modes of policing are discussed that have rearticulated the boundaries of urban citizenship in Antwerp. The disciplinary, bio-political and etho-political techniques of power each show in a different way attempts by the state to steer and effectively regulate what counts as appropriate conduct. As a corollary of governmental power, particular ways of behaving have been labelled as deviant and abnormal, thus rendering full citizenship conditional on a set of substantial expectations on how to perform as a citizen. As these expectations are only apparently neutral with respect to ethnic identities, a tension arose between the city’s universal and inclusive rhetoric and its particular and exclusionary policies.
id RCAP_bade067c1b2d346de4c84b308a10f184
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenshipexclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenshipRecent theoretical discussions have indicated that citizenship is not only a way of being, but also a way of behaving. This article aims to show how attempts to regulate the behaviour of the citizenry can introduce a new topography of inclusion and exclusion, thereby exercising a direct effect on particular ethnic minorities. We investigate the issue in Antwerp, the largest city of the Flemish Region in Belgium. With his slogan ‘Antwerp belongs to everyone’ former mayor Patrick Janssens gained significant international attention for Antwerp’s supposedly inclusive conception of urban citizenship. In this article, we argue that the universality of Antwerp’s city slogan has nevertheless veiled the introduction of new exclusionary prescriptions centred around citizens’ conduct. Drawing on a Foucauldian account of power, three different modes of policing are discussed that have rearticulated the boundaries of urban citizenship in Antwerp. The disciplinary, bio-political and etho-political techniques of power each show in a different way attempts by the state to steer and effectively regulate what counts as appropriate conduct. As a corollary of governmental power, particular ways of behaving have been labelled as deviant and abnormal, thus rendering full citizenship conditional on a set of substantial expectations on how to perform as a citizen. As these expectations are only apparently neutral with respect to ethnic identities, a tension arose between the city’s universal and inclusive rhetoric and its particular and exclusionary policies.Cogitatio2014-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32Social Inclusion; Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Policing Ethnicity: Between the Rhetoric of Inclusion and the Policies and Practices of Exclusion; 018-0282183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32/28Van Puymbroeck, NicolasBlondeel, PaulVandevoordt, Robininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:00:29Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:59.368249Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
title Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
spellingShingle Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas
exclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenship
title_short Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
title_full Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
title_fullStr Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
title_full_unstemmed Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
title_sort Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
author Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas
author_facet Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas
Blondeel, Paul
Vandevoordt, Robin
author_role author
author2 Blondeel, Paul
Vandevoordt, Robin
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas
Blondeel, Paul
Vandevoordt, Robin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv exclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenship
topic exclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenship
description Recent theoretical discussions have indicated that citizenship is not only a way of being, but also a way of behaving. This article aims to show how attempts to regulate the behaviour of the citizenry can introduce a new topography of inclusion and exclusion, thereby exercising a direct effect on particular ethnic minorities. We investigate the issue in Antwerp, the largest city of the Flemish Region in Belgium. With his slogan ‘Antwerp belongs to everyone’ former mayor Patrick Janssens gained significant international attention for Antwerp’s supposedly inclusive conception of urban citizenship. In this article, we argue that the universality of Antwerp’s city slogan has nevertheless veiled the introduction of new exclusionary prescriptions centred around citizens’ conduct. Drawing on a Foucauldian account of power, three different modes of policing are discussed that have rearticulated the boundaries of urban citizenship in Antwerp. The disciplinary, bio-political and etho-political techniques of power each show in a different way attempts by the state to steer and effectively regulate what counts as appropriate conduct. As a corollary of governmental power, particular ways of behaving have been labelled as deviant and abnormal, thus rendering full citizenship conditional on a set of substantial expectations on how to perform as a citizen. As these expectations are only apparently neutral with respect to ethnic identities, a tension arose between the city’s universal and inclusive rhetoric and its particular and exclusionary policies.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-17
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32/28
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Policing Ethnicity: Between the Rhetoric of Inclusion and the Policies and Practices of Exclusion; 018-028
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130665918136320