Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32 |
Resumo: | Recent theoretical discussions have indicated that citizenship is not only a way of being, but also a way of behaving. This article aims to show how attempts to regulate the behaviour of the citizenry can introduce a new topography of inclusion and exclusion, thereby exercising a direct effect on particular ethnic minorities. We investigate the issue in Antwerp, the largest city of the Flemish Region in Belgium. With his slogan ‘Antwerp belongs to everyone’ former mayor Patrick Janssens gained significant international attention for Antwerp’s supposedly inclusive conception of urban citizenship. In this article, we argue that the universality of Antwerp’s city slogan has nevertheless veiled the introduction of new exclusionary prescriptions centred around citizens’ conduct. Drawing on a Foucauldian account of power, three different modes of policing are discussed that have rearticulated the boundaries of urban citizenship in Antwerp. The disciplinary, bio-political and etho-political techniques of power each show in a different way attempts by the state to steer and effectively regulate what counts as appropriate conduct. As a corollary of governmental power, particular ways of behaving have been labelled as deviant and abnormal, thus rendering full citizenship conditional on a set of substantial expectations on how to perform as a citizen. As these expectations are only apparently neutral with respect to ethnic identities, a tension arose between the city’s universal and inclusive rhetoric and its particular and exclusionary policies. |
id |
RCAP_bade067c1b2d346de4c84b308a10f184 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenshipexclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenshipRecent theoretical discussions have indicated that citizenship is not only a way of being, but also a way of behaving. This article aims to show how attempts to regulate the behaviour of the citizenry can introduce a new topography of inclusion and exclusion, thereby exercising a direct effect on particular ethnic minorities. We investigate the issue in Antwerp, the largest city of the Flemish Region in Belgium. With his slogan ‘Antwerp belongs to everyone’ former mayor Patrick Janssens gained significant international attention for Antwerp’s supposedly inclusive conception of urban citizenship. In this article, we argue that the universality of Antwerp’s city slogan has nevertheless veiled the introduction of new exclusionary prescriptions centred around citizens’ conduct. Drawing on a Foucauldian account of power, three different modes of policing are discussed that have rearticulated the boundaries of urban citizenship in Antwerp. The disciplinary, bio-political and etho-political techniques of power each show in a different way attempts by the state to steer and effectively regulate what counts as appropriate conduct. As a corollary of governmental power, particular ways of behaving have been labelled as deviant and abnormal, thus rendering full citizenship conditional on a set of substantial expectations on how to perform as a citizen. As these expectations are only apparently neutral with respect to ethnic identities, a tension arose between the city’s universal and inclusive rhetoric and its particular and exclusionary policies.Cogitatio2014-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32Social Inclusion; Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Policing Ethnicity: Between the Rhetoric of Inclusion and the Policies and Practices of Exclusion; 018-0282183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32/28Van Puymbroeck, NicolasBlondeel, PaulVandevoordt, Robininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:00:29Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:59.368249Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
title |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
spellingShingle |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas exclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenship |
title_short |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
title_full |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
title_fullStr |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
title_sort |
Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship |
author |
Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas |
author_facet |
Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas Blondeel, Paul Vandevoordt, Robin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Blondeel, Paul Vandevoordt, Robin |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Van Puymbroeck, Nicolas Blondeel, Paul Vandevoordt, Robin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
exclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenship |
topic |
exclusion; Foucault; governmentality; Marshall; power; urban citizenship |
description |
Recent theoretical discussions have indicated that citizenship is not only a way of being, but also a way of behaving. This article aims to show how attempts to regulate the behaviour of the citizenry can introduce a new topography of inclusion and exclusion, thereby exercising a direct effect on particular ethnic minorities. We investigate the issue in Antwerp, the largest city of the Flemish Region in Belgium. With his slogan ‘Antwerp belongs to everyone’ former mayor Patrick Janssens gained significant international attention for Antwerp’s supposedly inclusive conception of urban citizenship. In this article, we argue that the universality of Antwerp’s city slogan has nevertheless veiled the introduction of new exclusionary prescriptions centred around citizens’ conduct. Drawing on a Foucauldian account of power, three different modes of policing are discussed that have rearticulated the boundaries of urban citizenship in Antwerp. The disciplinary, bio-political and etho-political techniques of power each show in a different way attempts by the state to steer and effectively regulate what counts as appropriate conduct. As a corollary of governmental power, particular ways of behaving have been labelled as deviant and abnormal, thus rendering full citizenship conditional on a set of substantial expectations on how to perform as a citizen. As these expectations are only apparently neutral with respect to ethnic identities, a tension arose between the city’s universal and inclusive rhetoric and its particular and exclusionary policies. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/32 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i3.32 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/32/28 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Policing Ethnicity: Between the Rhetoric of Inclusion and the Policies and Practices of Exclusion; 018-028 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130665918136320 |