Toulmin’s logical types
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/28871 |
Resumo: | SFRH/BPD/77687/2011 UID/FIL/00183/2013 |
id |
RCAP_bae0b3a59d30ae552fed47b432620ee2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/28871 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Toulmin’s logical typesStephen ToulminLogical typesFieldsPhenomenalismPositivismSFRH/BPD/77687/2011 UID/FIL/00183/2013In “The Uses of Argument” Toulmin introduces a number of concepts that have become popular in argumentation theory, such as data, claim, warrant, backing, force, field, and, most fundamentally, the concept of a “logical type”. Toulmin never defines the concept of a logical type or a field very clearly, and different interpretations can be found in the literature, either reconstructing what Toulmin has in mind, or revising his concepts to suit other concerns. A natural history of these concepts is not my concern. I will analyse logical types according to what Toulmin uses this concept for, namely to raise a problem with deductive logic and motivate its replacement with the Toulmin model. I will argue that a logical type and the distinction he draws between different logical types resembles distinctions made in logical positivism between the directly and the indirectly verifiable, and the problem raised is, in essence, the positivist’s problem of how indirect propositions can be justified on the basis of direct propositions. I will show that Toulmin makes a straw man of the positivists’ own solution to the problem and hence does not prove there to be an adequate motivation for replacing deductive logic with the Toulmin model.Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)RUNBotting, David Simon2022-03-27T01:01:18Z2017-06-012017-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/28871eng0920-427XPURE: 2335921https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9414-6info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:15:37Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/28871Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:29:05.273611Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Toulmin’s logical types |
title |
Toulmin’s logical types |
spellingShingle |
Toulmin’s logical types Botting, David Simon Stephen Toulmin Logical types Fields Phenomenalism Positivism |
title_short |
Toulmin’s logical types |
title_full |
Toulmin’s logical types |
title_fullStr |
Toulmin’s logical types |
title_full_unstemmed |
Toulmin’s logical types |
title_sort |
Toulmin’s logical types |
author |
Botting, David Simon |
author_facet |
Botting, David Simon |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Botting, David Simon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stephen Toulmin Logical types Fields Phenomenalism Positivism |
topic |
Stephen Toulmin Logical types Fields Phenomenalism Positivism |
description |
SFRH/BPD/77687/2011 UID/FIL/00183/2013 |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z 2022-03-27T01:01:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/28871 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/28871 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0920-427X PURE: 2335921 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9414-6 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137916330442752 |