“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics"
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/7505 |
Resumo: | The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics Maria Antónia Lima Abstract One of the most interesting aspects of the Gothic is its permanent epistemological and moral ambiguity, which results from its attention to the contradictory nature of a complex reality, where nothing is what it seems. This play of appearances has given many writers and artists the opportunity for exploring what Tom Gunning called ‘the aesthetics of astonishment,’ that describes many attractions and illusions of wondrous worlds, created to inspire curiosity, shock and fascination. Revealing the contradictions and ambivalences of many forms of lives and feelings, the Gothic could not escape the strong effect of the paradoxes provoked by the objects of its own creation, a fact that Noël Carroll explained in The Philosophy of Horror or the Paradoxes of the Heart. Dealing with the dark side of human experience and with its obscure duplicities, where the boundaries between good and evil blur, the Gothic possesses a double nature, which does not allow it to avoid the ambivalent effect of its aesthetics. Consequently, many expressions of horror are often self-referential, as Poe’s ‘Oval Portrait,’ King’s Misery or Ellis’ Lunar Park, where both writers and protagonists are haunted by their creations. It seems that like its readers, characters and creators, Gothic cannot escape its original and innate perversity. As Richard Benton says in ‘The Problems of Literary Gothicism,’ we should ask if we are not all rebels and Satanists underneath the skin and if our fascination with dark characters does not reveal our perverse impulses and ‘the tigers we ride on within the unconscious depths of our inner selves.’ Does Gothic aesthetics help to tame those tigers or does it make them even more violent? Is Gothic an expression of our contemporary fears, or does it create our own nightmares? Robert Bloch said ‘horror is the removal of masks,’ but Gothic, itself, has masks, that also need to be removed. Key Words: Gothic, paradox, terror, horror, dark side, aesthetics, duplicity. |
id |
RCAP_bba496b7fe132e4b6ab71de3a9a5c687 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/7505 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics"GothicParadoxThe Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics Maria Antónia Lima Abstract One of the most interesting aspects of the Gothic is its permanent epistemological and moral ambiguity, which results from its attention to the contradictory nature of a complex reality, where nothing is what it seems. This play of appearances has given many writers and artists the opportunity for exploring what Tom Gunning called ‘the aesthetics of astonishment,’ that describes many attractions and illusions of wondrous worlds, created to inspire curiosity, shock and fascination. Revealing the contradictions and ambivalences of many forms of lives and feelings, the Gothic could not escape the strong effect of the paradoxes provoked by the objects of its own creation, a fact that Noël Carroll explained in The Philosophy of Horror or the Paradoxes of the Heart. Dealing with the dark side of human experience and with its obscure duplicities, where the boundaries between good and evil blur, the Gothic possesses a double nature, which does not allow it to avoid the ambivalent effect of its aesthetics. Consequently, many expressions of horror are often self-referential, as Poe’s ‘Oval Portrait,’ King’s Misery or Ellis’ Lunar Park, where both writers and protagonists are haunted by their creations. It seems that like its readers, characters and creators, Gothic cannot escape its original and innate perversity. As Richard Benton says in ‘The Problems of Literary Gothicism,’ we should ask if we are not all rebels and Satanists underneath the skin and if our fascination with dark characters does not reveal our perverse impulses and ‘the tigers we ride on within the unconscious depths of our inner selves.’ Does Gothic aesthetics help to tame those tigers or does it make them even more violent? Is Gothic an expression of our contemporary fears, or does it create our own nightmares? Robert Bloch said ‘horror is the removal of masks,’ but Gothic, itself, has masks, that also need to be removed. Key Words: Gothic, paradox, terror, horror, dark side, aesthetics, duplicity.Interdisciplinairy Press, Oxford,2013-01-21T11:42:55Z2013-01-212012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/7505http://hdl.handle.net/10174/7505eng“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" in The Gothic - Probing the Boundaries, edited by Eoghain Hamilton, Interdisciplinairy Press, Oxford, 2012. ISBN:978-1-84888-088-7, pp. 3 – 11.https://www.interdisciplinarypress.net/my- cart/ebooks/ethos-and-modern-life/the-gothic-probing-the-boundariesantonialima@mail.telepac.pt296Lima, Maria Antoniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:47:55Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/7505Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:02:05.730893Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
title |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
spellingShingle |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" Lima, Maria Antonia Gothic Paradox |
title_short |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
title_full |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
title_fullStr |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
title_full_unstemmed |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
title_sort |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" |
author |
Lima, Maria Antonia |
author_facet |
Lima, Maria Antonia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Maria Antonia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gothic Paradox |
topic |
Gothic Paradox |
description |
The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics Maria Antónia Lima Abstract One of the most interesting aspects of the Gothic is its permanent epistemological and moral ambiguity, which results from its attention to the contradictory nature of a complex reality, where nothing is what it seems. This play of appearances has given many writers and artists the opportunity for exploring what Tom Gunning called ‘the aesthetics of astonishment,’ that describes many attractions and illusions of wondrous worlds, created to inspire curiosity, shock and fascination. Revealing the contradictions and ambivalences of many forms of lives and feelings, the Gothic could not escape the strong effect of the paradoxes provoked by the objects of its own creation, a fact that Noël Carroll explained in The Philosophy of Horror or the Paradoxes of the Heart. Dealing with the dark side of human experience and with its obscure duplicities, where the boundaries between good and evil blur, the Gothic possesses a double nature, which does not allow it to avoid the ambivalent effect of its aesthetics. Consequently, many expressions of horror are often self-referential, as Poe’s ‘Oval Portrait,’ King’s Misery or Ellis’ Lunar Park, where both writers and protagonists are haunted by their creations. It seems that like its readers, characters and creators, Gothic cannot escape its original and innate perversity. As Richard Benton says in ‘The Problems of Literary Gothicism,’ we should ask if we are not all rebels and Satanists underneath the skin and if our fascination with dark characters does not reveal our perverse impulses and ‘the tigers we ride on within the unconscious depths of our inner selves.’ Does Gothic aesthetics help to tame those tigers or does it make them even more violent? Is Gothic an expression of our contemporary fears, or does it create our own nightmares? Robert Bloch said ‘horror is the removal of masks,’ but Gothic, itself, has masks, that also need to be removed. Key Words: Gothic, paradox, terror, horror, dark side, aesthetics, duplicity. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z 2013-01-21T11:42:55Z 2013-01-21 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/7505 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/7505 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/7505 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
“The Paradox of Horror: The Dark Side of Gothic Aesthetics" in The Gothic - Probing the Boundaries, edited by Eoghain Hamilton, Interdisciplinairy Press, Oxford, 2012. ISBN:978-1-84888-088-7, pp. 3 – 11. https://www.interdisciplinarypress.net/my- cart/ebooks/ethos-and-modern-life/the-gothic-probing-the-boundaries antonialima@mail.telepac.pt 296 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinairy Press, Oxford, |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinairy Press, Oxford, |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136504912543744 |