Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sahlin, Ingrid
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2818
Resumo: What does the persistent construction of ‘the homeless’ and the revitalised term ‘our homeless’ include, imply, and exclude in Swedish political debate? And how is it politically and morally related to other houseless groups in the country? These questions are approached through an analysis of minutes from the Swedish Parliament 2015–2019. Inspired by Simmel’s (1908/1965) definition of ‘the poor’ as those who get (or would get) public assistance as poor, I claim that in Swedish political discourse, ‘(our) homeless’ comprise only those to whom the society acknowledges a responsibility to give shelter, thereby excluding the tens of thousands of people without homes that are temporarily accommodated by other authorities, private providers or individuals—or not at all. Although official definitions are housing-related, migrants without homes tend to be defined outside the ‘homeless’ concept, as well as from the municipalities’ responsibilities. I will argue that the reasons for this are institutional: regulations and their interpretation, coupled with traditions to care for only ‘our’ people which, in turn, are fortified by current nationalist sentiments.
id RCAP_bbc4e6ef5be5ef631dd90eb203fcc345
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2818
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?discursive exclusion; homeless definitions; houseless migrants; nationalist discourse; SwedenWhat does the persistent construction of ‘the homeless’ and the revitalised term ‘our homeless’ include, imply, and exclude in Swedish political debate? And how is it politically and morally related to other houseless groups in the country? These questions are approached through an analysis of minutes from the Swedish Parliament 2015–2019. Inspired by Simmel’s (1908/1965) definition of ‘the poor’ as those who get (or would get) public assistance as poor, I claim that in Swedish political discourse, ‘(our) homeless’ comprise only those to whom the society acknowledges a responsibility to give shelter, thereby excluding the tens of thousands of people without homes that are temporarily accommodated by other authorities, private providers or individuals—or not at all. Although official definitions are housing-related, migrants without homes tend to be defined outside the ‘homeless’ concept, as well as from the municipalities’ responsibilities. I will argue that the reasons for this are institutional: regulations and their interpretation, coupled with traditions to care for only ‘our’ people which, in turn, are fortified by current nationalist sentiments.Cogitatio2020-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2818oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2818Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): Home, Housing and Communities: Foundations for Inclusive Society; 43-532183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2818https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2818https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2818/2818Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Sahlinhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSahlin, Ingrid2022-12-20T10:58:53Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2818Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:18.956106Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
title Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
spellingShingle Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
Sahlin, Ingrid
discursive exclusion; homeless definitions; houseless migrants; nationalist discourse; Sweden
title_short Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
title_full Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
title_fullStr Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
title_full_unstemmed Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
title_sort Who’s Homeless and Whose Homeless?
author Sahlin, Ingrid
author_facet Sahlin, Ingrid
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sahlin, Ingrid
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv discursive exclusion; homeless definitions; houseless migrants; nationalist discourse; Sweden
topic discursive exclusion; homeless definitions; houseless migrants; nationalist discourse; Sweden
description What does the persistent construction of ‘the homeless’ and the revitalised term ‘our homeless’ include, imply, and exclude in Swedish political debate? And how is it politically and morally related to other houseless groups in the country? These questions are approached through an analysis of minutes from the Swedish Parliament 2015–2019. Inspired by Simmel’s (1908/1965) definition of ‘the poor’ as those who get (or would get) public assistance as poor, I claim that in Swedish political discourse, ‘(our) homeless’ comprise only those to whom the society acknowledges a responsibility to give shelter, thereby excluding the tens of thousands of people without homes that are temporarily accommodated by other authorities, private providers or individuals—or not at all. Although official definitions are housing-related, migrants without homes tend to be defined outside the ‘homeless’ concept, as well as from the municipalities’ responsibilities. I will argue that the reasons for this are institutional: regulations and their interpretation, coupled with traditions to care for only ‘our’ people which, in turn, are fortified by current nationalist sentiments.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2818
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2818
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2818
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2818
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2818
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2818
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2818/2818
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Sahlin
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Sahlin
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): Home, Housing and Communities: Foundations for Inclusive Society; 43-53
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130660249534464