Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silva, M
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Rong, LQ, Naik, A, Rahouma, M, Hameed, I, Robinson, B, Ruan, Y, Jiang, Y, Abed, AW, Girardi, LN, Gaudino, M
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3512
Summary: Background: Conduits used in coronary artery bypass artery grafting (CABG) have different properties and flow profiles. We compared intraoperative mean graft flow (MGF) between arterial and venous conduits, off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and on-pump CABG (ONCABG) procedures, skeletonized and pedicled internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts, and pulsatility index (PI) between OPCABG and ONCABG, in pairwise meta-analyses. Methods: Following a systematic literature search, all studies comparing MGF in arterial and venous grafts, were included. The primary endpoint was comparison of pooled MGF between arterial and venous grafts. Secondary endpoints were comparisons of pooled MGF in OPCABG vs ONCABG, anastomosed skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts, free skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts and PI in OPCABG versus ONCABG. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4443 patients were included. Compared with venous grafts, arterial grafts had lower MGF (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI, -0.34; -0.22]; P < .001). OPCABG was associated with significantly lower MGF compared to ONCABG (SMD, -0.29; 95%CI, -0.50; -0.08]; P = .01). No differences were found in MGF between skeletonized vs pedicled IMA after anastomosis (SMD, 0.32; 95%CI [-0.08; 0.71]; P = .11) or in free flow (SMD, 0.76; 95%CI [-0.14; 1.65]; P = .10). No difference was found in PI between OPCABG and ONCABG. At meta-regression, age was associated with higher MGF, while OPCABG was associated with lower MGF. Conclusions: Intraoperative flow of venous conduits is higher than that of arterial grafts. Compared to OPCABG surgery, graft flow is higher in ONCABG. In skeletonized and pedicled IMA conduits, no difference in flow profiles was found.
id RCAP_bc297e3d99662270999043ccb4fda00a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3512
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-AnalysisAge FactorsCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery Bypass, Off-PumpHumansIntraoperative PeriodMammary ArteriesVascular PatencyHSM CCTBackground: Conduits used in coronary artery bypass artery grafting (CABG) have different properties and flow profiles. We compared intraoperative mean graft flow (MGF) between arterial and venous conduits, off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and on-pump CABG (ONCABG) procedures, skeletonized and pedicled internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts, and pulsatility index (PI) between OPCABG and ONCABG, in pairwise meta-analyses. Methods: Following a systematic literature search, all studies comparing MGF in arterial and venous grafts, were included. The primary endpoint was comparison of pooled MGF between arterial and venous grafts. Secondary endpoints were comparisons of pooled MGF in OPCABG vs ONCABG, anastomosed skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts, free skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts and PI in OPCABG versus ONCABG. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4443 patients were included. Compared with venous grafts, arterial grafts had lower MGF (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI, -0.34; -0.22]; P < .001). OPCABG was associated with significantly lower MGF compared to ONCABG (SMD, -0.29; 95%CI, -0.50; -0.08]; P = .01). No differences were found in MGF between skeletonized vs pedicled IMA after anastomosis (SMD, 0.32; 95%CI [-0.08; 0.71]; P = .11) or in free flow (SMD, 0.76; 95%CI [-0.14; 1.65]; P = .10). No difference was found in PI between OPCABG and ONCABG. At meta-regression, age was associated with higher MGF, while OPCABG was associated with lower MGF. Conclusions: Intraoperative flow of venous conduits is higher than that of arterial grafts. Compared to OPCABG surgery, graft flow is higher in ONCABG. In skeletonized and pedicled IMA conduits, no difference in flow profiles was found.WileyRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPESilva, MRong, LQNaik, ARahouma, MHameed, IRobinson, BRuan, YJiang, YAbed, AWGirardi, LNGaudino, M2020-10-20T16:03:19Z2020-022020-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3512engJ Card Surg. 2020 Feb;35(2):279-285.10.1111/jocs.14359info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:43:21Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3512Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:49.571858Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
title Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
Silva, M
Age Factors
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Mammary Arteries
Vascular Patency
HSM CCT
title_short Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
title_full Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
title_sort Intraoperative Graft Flow Profiles in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis
author Silva, M
author_facet Silva, M
Rong, LQ
Naik, A
Rahouma, M
Hameed, I
Robinson, B
Ruan, Y
Jiang, Y
Abed, AW
Girardi, LN
Gaudino, M
author_role author
author2 Rong, LQ
Naik, A
Rahouma, M
Hameed, I
Robinson, B
Ruan, Y
Jiang, Y
Abed, AW
Girardi, LN
Gaudino, M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, M
Rong, LQ
Naik, A
Rahouma, M
Hameed, I
Robinson, B
Ruan, Y
Jiang, Y
Abed, AW
Girardi, LN
Gaudino, M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Age Factors
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Mammary Arteries
Vascular Patency
HSM CCT
topic Age Factors
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Mammary Arteries
Vascular Patency
HSM CCT
description Background: Conduits used in coronary artery bypass artery grafting (CABG) have different properties and flow profiles. We compared intraoperative mean graft flow (MGF) between arterial and venous conduits, off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and on-pump CABG (ONCABG) procedures, skeletonized and pedicled internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts, and pulsatility index (PI) between OPCABG and ONCABG, in pairwise meta-analyses. Methods: Following a systematic literature search, all studies comparing MGF in arterial and venous grafts, were included. The primary endpoint was comparison of pooled MGF between arterial and venous grafts. Secondary endpoints were comparisons of pooled MGF in OPCABG vs ONCABG, anastomosed skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts, free skeletonized vs pedicled IMA grafts and PI in OPCABG versus ONCABG. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4443 patients were included. Compared with venous grafts, arterial grafts had lower MGF (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI, -0.34; -0.22]; P < .001). OPCABG was associated with significantly lower MGF compared to ONCABG (SMD, -0.29; 95%CI, -0.50; -0.08]; P = .01). No differences were found in MGF between skeletonized vs pedicled IMA after anastomosis (SMD, 0.32; 95%CI [-0.08; 0.71]; P = .11) or in free flow (SMD, 0.76; 95%CI [-0.14; 1.65]; P = .10). No difference was found in PI between OPCABG and ONCABG. At meta-regression, age was associated with higher MGF, while OPCABG was associated with lower MGF. Conclusions: Intraoperative flow of venous conduits is higher than that of arterial grafts. Compared to OPCABG surgery, graft flow is higher in ONCABG. In skeletonized and pedicled IMA conduits, no difference in flow profiles was found.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-20T16:03:19Z
2020-02
2020-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3512
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3512
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Card Surg. 2020 Feb;35(2):279-285.
10.1111/jocs.14359
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131304742092800