The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Haugevik, Kristin
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sending, Ole Jacob
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
Resumo: Nordic governments frequently broadcast their ambition to do more together on the international stage. The five Nordic states (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway) also share many basic goals as foreign policy actors, including a steadfast and vocal commitment to safeguarding the ‘rules-based international order.’ Why then, do we not see more organized Nordic foreign policy collaboration, for example in the form of a joint ‘grand strategy’ on core foreign policy issues, or in relation to great powers and international organizations? In this article, we draw on Charles Tilly’s concept of ‘repertoires’ to address the discrepancy between ambitions and developments in Nordic foreign policy cooperation, highlighting how the bundles of policy instruments—repertoires—that each Nordic state has developed over time take on an identity-defining quality. We argue that the Nordic states have invested in and become attached to their foreign policy differences, niches, and ‘brands.’ On the international scene, and especially when interacting with significant other states, they tend not only to stick to what they know how to do and are accustomed to doing but also to promote their national rather than their Nordic profile. While Nordic cooperation forms part of all the five states’ foreign policy repertoire in specific policy areas, these are marginal compared to the distinctive repertoires on which each Nordic state rely in relation to more powerful states. It is therefore unlikely that we will see a ‘common order’ among the Nordic states in the foreign policy domain in the near future.
id RCAP_bc5441dd7e0f96075ea2b0652b1b6f5b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3380
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic Statescooperation; foreign policy; identity; Nordic region; repertoiresNordic governments frequently broadcast their ambition to do more together on the international stage. The five Nordic states (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway) also share many basic goals as foreign policy actors, including a steadfast and vocal commitment to safeguarding the ‘rules-based international order.’ Why then, do we not see more organized Nordic foreign policy collaboration, for example in the form of a joint ‘grand strategy’ on core foreign policy issues, or in relation to great powers and international organizations? In this article, we draw on Charles Tilly’s concept of ‘repertoires’ to address the discrepancy between ambitions and developments in Nordic foreign policy cooperation, highlighting how the bundles of policy instruments—repertoires—that each Nordic state has developed over time take on an identity-defining quality. We argue that the Nordic states have invested in and become attached to their foreign policy differences, niches, and ‘brands.’ On the international scene, and especially when interacting with significant other states, they tend not only to stick to what they know how to do and are accustomed to doing but also to promote their national rather than their Nordic profile. While Nordic cooperation forms part of all the five states’ foreign policy repertoire in specific policy areas, these are marginal compared to the distinctive repertoires on which each Nordic state rely in relation to more powerful states. It is therefore unlikely that we will see a ‘common order’ among the Nordic states in the foreign policy domain in the near future.Cogitatio2020-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3380Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Rediscovering Nordic Cooperation; 110-1192183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3380https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3380/3380Copyright (c) 2020 Kristin Haugevik, Ole Jacob Sendinghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHaugevik, KristinSending, Ole Jacob2022-12-22T15:16:47Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3380Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:29.200580Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
spellingShingle The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
Haugevik, Kristin
cooperation; foreign policy; identity; Nordic region; repertoires
title_short The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_full The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_fullStr The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_full_unstemmed The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
title_sort The Nordic Balance Revisited: Differentiation and the Foreign Policy Repertoires of the Nordic States
author Haugevik, Kristin
author_facet Haugevik, Kristin
Sending, Ole Jacob
author_role author
author2 Sending, Ole Jacob
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Haugevik, Kristin
Sending, Ole Jacob
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cooperation; foreign policy; identity; Nordic region; repertoires
topic cooperation; foreign policy; identity; Nordic region; repertoires
description Nordic governments frequently broadcast their ambition to do more together on the international stage. The five Nordic states (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway) also share many basic goals as foreign policy actors, including a steadfast and vocal commitment to safeguarding the ‘rules-based international order.’ Why then, do we not see more organized Nordic foreign policy collaboration, for example in the form of a joint ‘grand strategy’ on core foreign policy issues, or in relation to great powers and international organizations? In this article, we draw on Charles Tilly’s concept of ‘repertoires’ to address the discrepancy between ambitions and developments in Nordic foreign policy cooperation, highlighting how the bundles of policy instruments—repertoires—that each Nordic state has developed over time take on an identity-defining quality. We argue that the Nordic states have invested in and become attached to their foreign policy differences, niches, and ‘brands.’ On the international scene, and especially when interacting with significant other states, they tend not only to stick to what they know how to do and are accustomed to doing but also to promote their national rather than their Nordic profile. While Nordic cooperation forms part of all the five states’ foreign policy repertoire in specific policy areas, these are marginal compared to the distinctive repertoires on which each Nordic state rely in relation to more powerful states. It is therefore unlikely that we will see a ‘common order’ among the Nordic states in the foreign policy domain in the near future.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3380
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3380
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3380
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3380/3380
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kristin Haugevik, Ole Jacob Sending
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kristin Haugevik, Ole Jacob Sending
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Rediscovering Nordic Cooperation; 110-119
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130670373535744