Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Ana Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cruz, Joana, Marques, Alda, Demain, Sara, Samuel, Dinesh
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22116
Resumo: Background physical activity is recommended for people living with dementia, but evidence for the positive effects of physical activity is limited by the use of heterogeneous outcomes and measurement tools. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise previously reported outcomes and identify the measurement tools used most frequently in physical activity interventions for people with dementia. Methods literature searches were conducted in April 2015, on Delphis and Medline. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies reporting on any type of physical activity, in any setting, across types of dementia, stages of disease progression and published from 2005 onwards were included. A content analysis approach was used to report on the frequency of reported outcomes and measurement tools. Results the 130 included studies reported on 133 different outcome domains and 267 different measurement tools. ‘Functional abilities and independence’ (n = 69), ‘Global cognitive function’ (n = 65), ‘Balance’ (n = 43), ‘Global behavioural symptoms of dementia’ (n = 42) and ‘Health-related quality of life’ (n = 40) were the most frequently reported outcome domains. ‘Enjoyment’ was the outcome most frequently sought by patients and carers. Conclusion the need for the development and implementation of a Core Outcome Set has been reinforced. Ahead of the completion of the Core Outcome Set, researchers and clinicians are advised to measure the impact of physical activity interventions on these frequently reported outcome domains.
id RCAP_bd618975bbb1bc357da826ee82d496a9
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/22116
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome setPhysical activityDementiaOutcomesMeasurement toolsCore outcome setSystematic reviewOlder peopleBackground physical activity is recommended for people living with dementia, but evidence for the positive effects of physical activity is limited by the use of heterogeneous outcomes and measurement tools. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise previously reported outcomes and identify the measurement tools used most frequently in physical activity interventions for people with dementia. Methods literature searches were conducted in April 2015, on Delphis and Medline. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies reporting on any type of physical activity, in any setting, across types of dementia, stages of disease progression and published from 2005 onwards were included. A content analysis approach was used to report on the frequency of reported outcomes and measurement tools. Results the 130 included studies reported on 133 different outcome domains and 267 different measurement tools. ‘Functional abilities and independence’ (n = 69), ‘Global cognitive function’ (n = 65), ‘Balance’ (n = 43), ‘Global behavioural symptoms of dementia’ (n = 42) and ‘Health-related quality of life’ (n = 40) were the most frequently reported outcome domains. ‘Enjoyment’ was the outcome most frequently sought by patients and carers. Conclusion the need for the development and implementation of a Core Outcome Set has been reinforced. Ahead of the completion of the Core Outcome Set, researchers and clinicians are advised to measure the impact of physical activity interventions on these frequently reported outcome domains.Oxford University Press2017-08-092017-08-09T00:00:00Z2018-08-09T15:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/22116eng0002-072910.1093/ageing/afx135Gonçalves, Ana CarolinaCruz, JoanaMarques, AldaDemain, SaraSamuel, Dineshinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:12:26Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/22116Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T04:12:26Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
title Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
spellingShingle Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
Gonçalves, Ana Carolina
Physical activity
Dementia
Outcomes
Measurement tools
Core outcome set
Systematic review
Older people
title_short Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
title_full Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
title_fullStr Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
title_sort Evaluating physical activity in dementia: a systematic review of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set
author Gonçalves, Ana Carolina
author_facet Gonçalves, Ana Carolina
Cruz, Joana
Marques, Alda
Demain, Sara
Samuel, Dinesh
author_role author
author2 Cruz, Joana
Marques, Alda
Demain, Sara
Samuel, Dinesh
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Ana Carolina
Cruz, Joana
Marques, Alda
Demain, Sara
Samuel, Dinesh
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physical activity
Dementia
Outcomes
Measurement tools
Core outcome set
Systematic review
Older people
topic Physical activity
Dementia
Outcomes
Measurement tools
Core outcome set
Systematic review
Older people
description Background physical activity is recommended for people living with dementia, but evidence for the positive effects of physical activity is limited by the use of heterogeneous outcomes and measurement tools. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise previously reported outcomes and identify the measurement tools used most frequently in physical activity interventions for people with dementia. Methods literature searches were conducted in April 2015, on Delphis and Medline. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies reporting on any type of physical activity, in any setting, across types of dementia, stages of disease progression and published from 2005 onwards were included. A content analysis approach was used to report on the frequency of reported outcomes and measurement tools. Results the 130 included studies reported on 133 different outcome domains and 267 different measurement tools. ‘Functional abilities and independence’ (n = 69), ‘Global cognitive function’ (n = 65), ‘Balance’ (n = 43), ‘Global behavioural symptoms of dementia’ (n = 42) and ‘Health-related quality of life’ (n = 40) were the most frequently reported outcome domains. ‘Enjoyment’ was the outcome most frequently sought by patients and carers. Conclusion the need for the development and implementation of a Core Outcome Set has been reinforced. Ahead of the completion of the Core Outcome Set, researchers and clinicians are advised to measure the impact of physical activity interventions on these frequently reported outcome domains.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-09
2017-08-09T00:00:00Z
2018-08-09T15:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22116
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22116
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0002-0729
10.1093/ageing/afx135
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817543660412076032