Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schmitt, A.
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Wapler, U., Couallier, V., Cunha, E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2006.08.002
Resumo: Clinical studies indicate that genetic factors play a crucial role in primary osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. In addition, it has been suggested that these two diseases are inversely related. Within a population, one can find two sub-groups: the "bone formers" and the "bone losers". The changes to the joint surfaces used to assess adult age at death are related to the loss of bone substance and to bone formation (osteophytes). The modification of these indicators with age differs between bone formers and bone losers. Therefore, age-at-death assessment methods should make use of two standards, one for each sub-group. A preliminary study examining the possibility of distinguishing those who lose cortical bone from those who show signs of bony formation was conducted on a series of skeletons from Portugal, dating to the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. Bone loss was evaluated using the cortical index (CI) of the second metacarpal on X-rays. The presence of osteophytes on dry bones was assessed macroscopically.
id RCAP_bd673168bd02609799e4f97efe326937
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/3760
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methodsClinical studies indicate that genetic factors play a crucial role in primary osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. In addition, it has been suggested that these two diseases are inversely related. Within a population, one can find two sub-groups: the "bone formers" and the "bone losers". The changes to the joint surfaces used to assess adult age at death are related to the loss of bone substance and to bone formation (osteophytes). The modification of these indicators with age differs between bone formers and bone losers. Therefore, age-at-death assessment methods should make use of two standards, one for each sub-group. A preliminary study examining the possibility of distinguishing those who lose cortical bone from those who show signs of bony formation was conducted on a series of skeletons from Portugal, dating to the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. Bone loss was evaluated using the cortical index (CI) of the second metacarpal on X-rays. The presence of osteophytes on dry bones was assessed macroscopically.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7GW4-4MY114W-1/1/f17cf44e089dc09f083f559e325a8b1b2007info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleaplication/PDFhttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/3760http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3760https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2006.08.002engHOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 58:1 (2007) 53-66Schmitt, A.Wapler, U.Couallier, V.Cunha, E.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-11-06T16:49:09Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/3760Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:55:48.735151Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
title Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
spellingShingle Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
Schmitt, A.
title_short Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
title_full Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
title_fullStr Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
title_full_unstemmed Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
title_sort Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
author Schmitt, A.
author_facet Schmitt, A.
Wapler, U.
Couallier, V.
Cunha, E.
author_role author
author2 Wapler, U.
Couallier, V.
Cunha, E.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schmitt, A.
Wapler, U.
Couallier, V.
Cunha, E.
description Clinical studies indicate that genetic factors play a crucial role in primary osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. In addition, it has been suggested that these two diseases are inversely related. Within a population, one can find two sub-groups: the "bone formers" and the "bone losers". The changes to the joint surfaces used to assess adult age at death are related to the loss of bone substance and to bone formation (osteophytes). The modification of these indicators with age differs between bone formers and bone losers. Therefore, age-at-death assessment methods should make use of two standards, one for each sub-group. A preliminary study examining the possibility of distinguishing those who lose cortical bone from those who show signs of bony formation was conducted on a series of skeletons from Portugal, dating to the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. Bone loss was evaluated using the cortical index (CI) of the second metacarpal on X-rays. The presence of osteophytes on dry bones was assessed macroscopically.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3760
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2006.08.002
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2006.08.002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 58:1 (2007) 53-66
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv aplication/PDF
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133844292501504