Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pires, J.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Moreira, L., Teixeira, J. P., Fraga, S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.47
Resumo: Background: The growing number of items incorporating nanomaterials (NM) has prompted considerable concerns about human health and safety [1]. Metal nanoparticles, inorganic non-metallic, and carbon-based NM are among the types with the highest market volume [2]. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of chemical composition [Ag, Au, TiO2, SiO2, and graphene oxide (nano_GO)], primary size (10, 30 and 60 nm AgNP and AuNP), crystal structure (TiO2NP rutile/anatase and anatase), and surface coating (citrate and PEGylated AuNP) on potential toxicity to human intestinal (Caco-2) and placental (BeWo b30) epithelial cells. Methods: Changes in cell morphology, metabolic activity, plasma membrane integrity, intracellular ROS and ATP levels, and DNA integrity were assessed to investigate their potential toxicity at 24 h after exposure. Results: In both barrier models, the toxicity profile was similar, however placentalwere more sensitive than intestinal epithelial cells. Overall, NM may be ranked for cytotoxicity as AgNP > nano_GO > AuNP ~ TiO2NP ~ SiO2NP, with the effects becoming more evident at greater concentrations. The influence of size was more pronounced for AgNP than for AuNP, with the smaller nanoparticles producing higher cytotoxic effects. The cytotoxicity of AuNP was prevented by PEG capping. AgNP and nano_GO exposure markedly raised the levels of ROS, indicating that oxidative stress may play a role in their cytotoxicity. Except for 10 nm AuNP, every NM tested markedly increased intracellular ATP levels. One interesting finding was that a higher cytotoxic potential did not necessarily equate to a higher genotoxic potential, since only AgNP (classified as positive) and anatase TiO2NP (classified as equivocal) caused DNA damage. Conclusions: Our findings alert to the potential risks associated with human barriers exposure to NM, where the physicochemical properties are important determinants of their toxicity. Additional research is needed for a deeper understanding of NM impact on human barriers.
id RCAP_bd860ba113eb5183d8ac7290002a56fb
oai_identifier_str oai:publicacoes.cespu.pt:article/47
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cellsSelected Oral CommunicationBackground: The growing number of items incorporating nanomaterials (NM) has prompted considerable concerns about human health and safety [1]. Metal nanoparticles, inorganic non-metallic, and carbon-based NM are among the types with the highest market volume [2]. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of chemical composition [Ag, Au, TiO2, SiO2, and graphene oxide (nano_GO)], primary size (10, 30 and 60 nm AgNP and AuNP), crystal structure (TiO2NP rutile/anatase and anatase), and surface coating (citrate and PEGylated AuNP) on potential toxicity to human intestinal (Caco-2) and placental (BeWo b30) epithelial cells. Methods: Changes in cell morphology, metabolic activity, plasma membrane integrity, intracellular ROS and ATP levels, and DNA integrity were assessed to investigate their potential toxicity at 24 h after exposure. Results: In both barrier models, the toxicity profile was similar, however placentalwere more sensitive than intestinal epithelial cells. Overall, NM may be ranked for cytotoxicity as AgNP > nano_GO > AuNP ~ TiO2NP ~ SiO2NP, with the effects becoming more evident at greater concentrations. The influence of size was more pronounced for AgNP than for AuNP, with the smaller nanoparticles producing higher cytotoxic effects. The cytotoxicity of AuNP was prevented by PEG capping. AgNP and nano_GO exposure markedly raised the levels of ROS, indicating that oxidative stress may play a role in their cytotoxicity. Except for 10 nm AuNP, every NM tested markedly increased intracellular ATP levels. One interesting finding was that a higher cytotoxic potential did not necessarily equate to a higher genotoxic potential, since only AgNP (classified as positive) and anatase TiO2NP (classified as equivocal) caused DNA damage. Conclusions: Our findings alert to the potential risks associated with human barriers exposure to NM, where the physicochemical properties are important determinants of their toxicity. Additional research is needed for a deeper understanding of NM impact on human barriers.IUCS-CESPU Publishing2023-04-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.47https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.47Scientific Letters; Vol. 1 No. Sup 1 (2023)2795-5117reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/47https://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/47/118Copyright (c) 2023 J. Pires, L. Moreira, J. P. Teixeira, S. Fragainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPires, J.Moreira, L.Teixeira, J. P.Fraga, S.2023-04-29T08:46:00Zoai:publicacoes.cespu.pt:article/47Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:50:21.806408Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
title Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
Pires, J.
Selected Oral Communication
title_short Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
title_full Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
title_sort Comparative analysis of the toxicity profile of eleven consumer-relevant nanomaterials in human intestinal and placental barrier cells
author Pires, J.
author_facet Pires, J.
Moreira, L.
Teixeira, J. P.
Fraga, S.
author_role author
author2 Moreira, L.
Teixeira, J. P.
Fraga, S.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pires, J.
Moreira, L.
Teixeira, J. P.
Fraga, S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Selected Oral Communication
topic Selected Oral Communication
description Background: The growing number of items incorporating nanomaterials (NM) has prompted considerable concerns about human health and safety [1]. Metal nanoparticles, inorganic non-metallic, and carbon-based NM are among the types with the highest market volume [2]. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of chemical composition [Ag, Au, TiO2, SiO2, and graphene oxide (nano_GO)], primary size (10, 30 and 60 nm AgNP and AuNP), crystal structure (TiO2NP rutile/anatase and anatase), and surface coating (citrate and PEGylated AuNP) on potential toxicity to human intestinal (Caco-2) and placental (BeWo b30) epithelial cells. Methods: Changes in cell morphology, metabolic activity, plasma membrane integrity, intracellular ROS and ATP levels, and DNA integrity were assessed to investigate their potential toxicity at 24 h after exposure. Results: In both barrier models, the toxicity profile was similar, however placentalwere more sensitive than intestinal epithelial cells. Overall, NM may be ranked for cytotoxicity as AgNP > nano_GO > AuNP ~ TiO2NP ~ SiO2NP, with the effects becoming more evident at greater concentrations. The influence of size was more pronounced for AgNP than for AuNP, with the smaller nanoparticles producing higher cytotoxic effects. The cytotoxicity of AuNP was prevented by PEG capping. AgNP and nano_GO exposure markedly raised the levels of ROS, indicating that oxidative stress may play a role in their cytotoxicity. Except for 10 nm AuNP, every NM tested markedly increased intracellular ATP levels. One interesting finding was that a higher cytotoxic potential did not necessarily equate to a higher genotoxic potential, since only AgNP (classified as positive) and anatase TiO2NP (classified as equivocal) caused DNA damage. Conclusions: Our findings alert to the potential risks associated with human barriers exposure to NM, where the physicochemical properties are important determinants of their toxicity. Additional research is needed for a deeper understanding of NM impact on human barriers.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.47
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.47
url https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2023.47
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/47
https://publicacoes.cespu.pt/index.php/sl/article/view/47/118
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 J. Pires, L. Moreira, J. P. Teixeira, S. Fraga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 J. Pires, L. Moreira, J. P. Teixeira, S. Fraga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IUCS-CESPU Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IUCS-CESPU Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Letters; Vol. 1 No. Sup 1 (2023)
2795-5117
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131583691620352