Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: White, M. P.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Elliott, L. R., Grellier, J., Economou, T., Bell, S., Bratman, G. N., Cirach, M., Gascon, M., Lima, M. L., Lõhmus, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Ojala, A., Roiko, A., Schultz, P. W., van den Bosch, M. A., Fleming, L. E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22515
Resumo: Living near, recreating in, and feeling psychologically connected to, the natural world are all associated with better mental health, but many exposure-related questions remain. Using data from an 18-country survey (n= 16,307) we explored associations between multiple measures of mental health (positive well-being, mental distress, depression/anxiety medication use) and: (a) exposures (residential/recreational visits) to diferent natural settings (green/inland-blue/coastalblue spaces); and (b) nature connectedness, across season and country. People who lived in greener/ coastal neighbourhoods reported higher positive well-being, but this association largely disappeared when recreational visits were controlled for. Frequency of recreational visits to green, inland-blue, and coastal-blue spaces in the last 4 weeks were all positively associated with positive well-being and negatively associated with mental distress. Associations with green space visits were relatively consistent across seasons and countries but associations with blue space visits showed greater heterogeneity. Nature connectedness was also positively associated with positive well-being and negatively associated with mental distress and was, along with green space visits, associated with a lower likelihood of using medication for depression. By contrast inland-blue space visits were associated with a greater likelihood of using anxiety medication. Results highlight the benefts of multi-exposure, multi-response, multi-country studies in exploring complexity in nature-health associations.
id RCAP_bd8b5530973d15e9f8fe43e90c0e7ab3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22515
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countriesLiving near, recreating in, and feeling psychologically connected to, the natural world are all associated with better mental health, but many exposure-related questions remain. Using data from an 18-country survey (n= 16,307) we explored associations between multiple measures of mental health (positive well-being, mental distress, depression/anxiety medication use) and: (a) exposures (residential/recreational visits) to diferent natural settings (green/inland-blue/coastalblue spaces); and (b) nature connectedness, across season and country. People who lived in greener/ coastal neighbourhoods reported higher positive well-being, but this association largely disappeared when recreational visits were controlled for. Frequency of recreational visits to green, inland-blue, and coastal-blue spaces in the last 4 weeks were all positively associated with positive well-being and negatively associated with mental distress. Associations with green space visits were relatively consistent across seasons and countries but associations with blue space visits showed greater heterogeneity. Nature connectedness was also positively associated with positive well-being and negatively associated with mental distress and was, along with green space visits, associated with a lower likelihood of using medication for depression. By contrast inland-blue space visits were associated with a greater likelihood of using anxiety medication. Results highlight the benefts of multi-exposure, multi-response, multi-country studies in exploring complexity in nature-health associations.Nature Publishing Group2021-04-30T17:56:55Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-04-30T18:56:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22515eng2045-232210.1038/s41598-021-87675-0White, M. P.Elliott, L. R.Grellier, J.Economou, T.Bell, S.Bratman, G. N.Cirach, M.Gascon, M.Lima, M. L.Lõhmus, M.Nieuwenhuijsen, M.Ojala, A.Roiko, A.Schultz, P. W.van den Bosch, M. A.Fleming, L. E.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:49:37Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22515Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:24:23.334527Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
title Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
spellingShingle Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
White, M. P.
title_short Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
title_full Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
title_fullStr Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
title_full_unstemmed Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
title_sort Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries
author White, M. P.
author_facet White, M. P.
Elliott, L. R.
Grellier, J.
Economou, T.
Bell, S.
Bratman, G. N.
Cirach, M.
Gascon, M.
Lima, M. L.
Lõhmus, M.
Nieuwenhuijsen, M.
Ojala, A.
Roiko, A.
Schultz, P. W.
van den Bosch, M. A.
Fleming, L. E.
author_role author
author2 Elliott, L. R.
Grellier, J.
Economou, T.
Bell, S.
Bratman, G. N.
Cirach, M.
Gascon, M.
Lima, M. L.
Lõhmus, M.
Nieuwenhuijsen, M.
Ojala, A.
Roiko, A.
Schultz, P. W.
van den Bosch, M. A.
Fleming, L. E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv White, M. P.
Elliott, L. R.
Grellier, J.
Economou, T.
Bell, S.
Bratman, G. N.
Cirach, M.
Gascon, M.
Lima, M. L.
Lõhmus, M.
Nieuwenhuijsen, M.
Ojala, A.
Roiko, A.
Schultz, P. W.
van den Bosch, M. A.
Fleming, L. E.
description Living near, recreating in, and feeling psychologically connected to, the natural world are all associated with better mental health, but many exposure-related questions remain. Using data from an 18-country survey (n= 16,307) we explored associations between multiple measures of mental health (positive well-being, mental distress, depression/anxiety medication use) and: (a) exposures (residential/recreational visits) to diferent natural settings (green/inland-blue/coastalblue spaces); and (b) nature connectedness, across season and country. People who lived in greener/ coastal neighbourhoods reported higher positive well-being, but this association largely disappeared when recreational visits were controlled for. Frequency of recreational visits to green, inland-blue, and coastal-blue spaces in the last 4 weeks were all positively associated with positive well-being and negatively associated with mental distress. Associations with green space visits were relatively consistent across seasons and countries but associations with blue space visits showed greater heterogeneity. Nature connectedness was also positively associated with positive well-being and negatively associated with mental distress and was, along with green space visits, associated with a lower likelihood of using medication for depression. By contrast inland-blue space visits were associated with a greater likelihood of using anxiety medication. Results highlight the benefts of multi-exposure, multi-response, multi-country studies in exploring complexity in nature-health associations.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-30T17:56:55Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-04-30T18:56:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22515
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22515
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2045-2322
10.1038/s41598-021-87675-0
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134806036971520