Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-84742021000300041 |
Resumo: | Abstract Dewey’s argument for education is predicated on how, as free and intelligent beings, we have the power to develop dispositions. However, in a context where democracy is neutered by anti-politics, reading Dewey now comes with an urgent need to revisit his argument for an experiential and experimental approach towards the world. Revisiting Horkheimer’s critique of Dewey, which reveals two opposed notions of instrumentalism, this article argues that unless Dewey is reassessed from the non-identitarian character of his pragmatism, his philosophy of education risks being lost to an alignment with social constructivism. This exposes the Deweyan approach to what Maxine Greene calls a disjunction in the culture between everydayness and reason, where the “integrations” that Dewey achieved with his concentration on experience vanish. Historically framed, this paper draws on Lorraine Hansberry and James Baldwin’s discussion of a democracy that is more akin to a “burning house” than an associated form of living. |
id |
RCAP_be3be91897fd505cff257b1456d05c0b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2182-84742021000300041 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Centurydispositioninstrumentalismanti-politicsdemocracyeducationracethe artsAbstract Dewey’s argument for education is predicated on how, as free and intelligent beings, we have the power to develop dispositions. However, in a context where democracy is neutered by anti-politics, reading Dewey now comes with an urgent need to revisit his argument for an experiential and experimental approach towards the world. Revisiting Horkheimer’s critique of Dewey, which reveals two opposed notions of instrumentalism, this article argues that unless Dewey is reassessed from the non-identitarian character of his pragmatism, his philosophy of education risks being lost to an alignment with social constructivism. This exposes the Deweyan approach to what Maxine Greene calls a disjunction in the culture between everydayness and reason, where the “integrations” that Dewey achieved with his concentration on experience vanish. Historically framed, this paper draws on Lorraine Hansberry and James Baldwin’s discussion of a democracy that is more akin to a “burning house” than an associated form of living.Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-84742021000300041Sisyphus - Journal of Education v.8 n.3 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-84742021000300041Baldacchino,Johninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:29:20Zoai:scielo:S2182-84742021000300041Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:33:19.134481Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
title |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
spellingShingle |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century Baldacchino,John disposition instrumentalism anti-politics democracy education race the arts |
title_short |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
title_full |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
title_fullStr |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
title_full_unstemmed |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
title_sort |
Education’s Experience in an Age of Anti-Politics: Reading John Dewey in the Third Decade of the 21st Century |
author |
Baldacchino,John |
author_facet |
Baldacchino,John |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baldacchino,John |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
disposition instrumentalism anti-politics democracy education race the arts |
topic |
disposition instrumentalism anti-politics democracy education race the arts |
description |
Abstract Dewey’s argument for education is predicated on how, as free and intelligent beings, we have the power to develop dispositions. However, in a context where democracy is neutered by anti-politics, reading Dewey now comes with an urgent need to revisit his argument for an experiential and experimental approach towards the world. Revisiting Horkheimer’s critique of Dewey, which reveals two opposed notions of instrumentalism, this article argues that unless Dewey is reassessed from the non-identitarian character of his pragmatism, his philosophy of education risks being lost to an alignment with social constructivism. This exposes the Deweyan approach to what Maxine Greene calls a disjunction in the culture between everydayness and reason, where the “integrations” that Dewey achieved with his concentration on experience vanish. Historically framed, this paper draws on Lorraine Hansberry and James Baldwin’s discussion of a democracy that is more akin to a “burning house” than an associated form of living. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-84742021000300041 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-84742021000300041 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-84742021000300041 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sisyphus - Journal of Education v.8 n.3 2021 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137392365404160 |