Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caleça, Telma
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Pedro, Vitorino, Marina, Menezes, Maria, Sampaio-Alves, Mafalda, Mendes, Ana Duarte, Vicente, Rodrigo, Negreiros, Ida, Faria, Ana, Costa, Diogo Alpuim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/149616
Resumo: In this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the “16S rRNA” gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called ‘GutHealth_DB’. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the richness and evenness of the gut microbiota. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was calculated using a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test. The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.28 × 10−12 for the Chao index and p = 1.64 × 10−12 for the ACE index). The Shannon index, a marker of richness and evenness, was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.72). The microbiota composition was different between the two groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA (p = 9.99 × 10−5) and Anosim (p = 0.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion (p = 0.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. The relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera, and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. The F/B ratio was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, p < 0.001. Our study allowed us to observe significant taxonomic disparities in the two groups by testing the differences between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship.
id RCAP_c12738a97e1f956c8c1d0794206e869b
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/149616
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy WomenCould Gut Microbiota Make a Difference?—“BiotaCancerSurvivors”: A Case-Control Studybreast cancercancercase-control studymicrobiomemicrobiotasurvivorssurvivorshipOncologyCancer ResearchSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingIn this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the “16S rRNA” gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called ‘GutHealth_DB’. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the richness and evenness of the gut microbiota. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was calculated using a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test. The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.28 × 10−12 for the Chao index and p = 1.64 × 10−12 for the ACE index). The Shannon index, a marker of richness and evenness, was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.72). The microbiota composition was different between the two groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA (p = 9.99 × 10−5) and Anosim (p = 0.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion (p = 0.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. The relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera, and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. The F/B ratio was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, p < 0.001. Our study allowed us to observe significant taxonomic disparities in the two groups by testing the differences between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship.Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS)Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - pólo NMSNOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)RUNCaleça, TelmaRibeiro, PedroVitorino, MarinaMenezes, MariaSampaio-Alves, MafaldaMendes, Ana DuarteVicente, RodrigoNegreiros, IdaFaria, AnaCosta, Diogo Alpuim2023-02-23T22:20:18Z2023-022023-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/149616eng2072-6694PURE: 53592596https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030594info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:31:30Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/149616Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:53:48.168030Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
Could Gut Microbiota Make a Difference?—“BiotaCancerSurvivors”: A Case-Control Study
title Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
spellingShingle Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
Caleça, Telma
breast cancer
cancer
case-control study
microbiome
microbiota
survivors
survivorship
Oncology
Cancer Research
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
title_short Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
title_full Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
title_sort Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women
author Caleça, Telma
author_facet Caleça, Telma
Ribeiro, Pedro
Vitorino, Marina
Menezes, Maria
Sampaio-Alves, Mafalda
Mendes, Ana Duarte
Vicente, Rodrigo
Negreiros, Ida
Faria, Ana
Costa, Diogo Alpuim
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Pedro
Vitorino, Marina
Menezes, Maria
Sampaio-Alves, Mafalda
Mendes, Ana Duarte
Vicente, Rodrigo
Negreiros, Ida
Faria, Ana
Costa, Diogo Alpuim
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS)
Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - pólo NMS
NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caleça, Telma
Ribeiro, Pedro
Vitorino, Marina
Menezes, Maria
Sampaio-Alves, Mafalda
Mendes, Ana Duarte
Vicente, Rodrigo
Negreiros, Ida
Faria, Ana
Costa, Diogo Alpuim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv breast cancer
cancer
case-control study
microbiome
microbiota
survivors
survivorship
Oncology
Cancer Research
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
topic breast cancer
cancer
case-control study
microbiome
microbiota
survivors
survivorship
Oncology
Cancer Research
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
description In this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the “16S rRNA” gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called ‘GutHealth_DB’. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the richness and evenness of the gut microbiota. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was calculated using a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test. The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.28 × 10−12 for the Chao index and p = 1.64 × 10−12 for the ACE index). The Shannon index, a marker of richness and evenness, was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.72). The microbiota composition was different between the two groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA (p = 9.99 × 10−5) and Anosim (p = 0.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion (p = 0.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. The relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera, and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. The F/B ratio was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, p < 0.001. Our study allowed us to observe significant taxonomic disparities in the two groups by testing the differences between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-23T22:20:18Z
2023-02
2023-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/149616
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/149616
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2072-6694
PURE: 53592596
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030594
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138128070443008