Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajpa.24612 |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41904 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24612 |
Resumo: | It has been repeatedly acknowledged that age-at-death estimation based on dentalcementum represents a partial and time-consuming method that hinders adoptionof this histological approach. User-friendly micrograph analysis represents a grow-ing request of cementochronology. This article evaluates the feasibility of using amodule to accurately quantify cementum deposits and compares the module's per-formance to that of a human expert. On a dental collection (n=200) of known-ageindividuals, precision and accuracy of estimates performed by a developed pro-gram (101 count/tooth;n=20,200 counts) were compared to counts performedmanually (5 counts/tooth;n=975 counts). Reliability of the software and agree-ment between the two approaches were assessed byintraclass correlation coeffi-cient and Bland Altman analysis. The automated module produced reliable andreproducible counts with a higher global precision than the human expert. Althoughthe software is slightly more precise, it shows higher sensitivity to taphonomic dam-ages and does not avoid the trajectory effect described for age-at-death estimationin adults. Likewise, for human counts, global accuracy is acceptable, but underestima-tions increase with age. The quantification of the agreement between the twoapproaches shows a minor bias, and 94% of individuals fall within the intervals ofagreement. Automation gives an impression of objectivity even though the region ofinterest, profile position and parameters are defined manually. The automated systemmay represent a time-saving module that can allow an increase in sample size, whichis particularly stimulating for population-based studies. |
id |
RCAP_c1769480326a9043c2d51fa4619f616a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/41904 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication?Age-at-deathAutomationCementochronologyDental cementumIt has been repeatedly acknowledged that age-at-death estimation based on dentalcementum represents a partial and time-consuming method that hinders adoptionof this histological approach. User-friendly micrograph analysis represents a grow-ing request of cementochronology. This article evaluates the feasibility of using amodule to accurately quantify cementum deposits and compares the module's per-formance to that of a human expert. On a dental collection (n=200) of known-ageindividuals, precision and accuracy of estimates performed by a developed pro-gram (101 count/tooth;n=20,200 counts) were compared to counts performedmanually (5 counts/tooth;n=975 counts). Reliability of the software and agree-ment between the two approaches were assessed byintraclass correlation coeffi-cient and Bland Altman analysis. The automated module produced reliable andreproducible counts with a higher global precision than the human expert. Althoughthe software is slightly more precise, it shows higher sensitivity to taphonomic dam-ages and does not avoid the trajectory effect described for age-at-death estimationin adults. Likewise, for human counts, global accuracy is acceptable, but underestima-tions increase with age. The quantification of the agreement between the twoapproaches shows a minor bias, and 94% of individuals fall within the intervals ofagreement. Automation gives an impression of objectivity even though the region ofinterest, profile position and parameters are defined manually. The automated systemmay represent a time-saving module that can allow an increase in sample size, whichis particularly stimulating for population-based studies.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionWiley2022-10-11T16:10:48Z2022-10-112022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41904http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41904https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24612engBertrand, B., Vercauteren, M., Cunha, E., Bécart, A., Gosset, D., & Hédouin, V. (2022). Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 179(2), 314–3262692-7691http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertrand, BenoitVercauteren, MartineCunha, EBécart, AnneGosset, DidierHédouin, Valeryreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-03T04:22:07Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/41904Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:07:44.340527Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
title |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
spellingShingle |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? Bertrand, Benoit Age-at-death Automation Cementochronology Dental cementum Bertrand, Benoit Age-at-death Automation Cementochronology Dental cementum |
title_short |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
title_full |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
title_fullStr |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
title_sort |
Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? |
author |
Bertrand, Benoit |
author_facet |
Bertrand, Benoit Bertrand, Benoit Vercauteren, Martine Cunha, E Bécart, Anne Gosset, Didier Hédouin, Valery Vercauteren, Martine Cunha, E Bécart, Anne Gosset, Didier Hédouin, Valery |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vercauteren, Martine Cunha, E Bécart, Anne Gosset, Didier Hédouin, Valery |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bertrand, Benoit Vercauteren, Martine Cunha, E Bécart, Anne Gosset, Didier Hédouin, Valery |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Age-at-death Automation Cementochronology Dental cementum |
topic |
Age-at-death Automation Cementochronology Dental cementum |
description |
It has been repeatedly acknowledged that age-at-death estimation based on dentalcementum represents a partial and time-consuming method that hinders adoptionof this histological approach. User-friendly micrograph analysis represents a grow-ing request of cementochronology. This article evaluates the feasibility of using amodule to accurately quantify cementum deposits and compares the module's per-formance to that of a human expert. On a dental collection (n=200) of known-ageindividuals, precision and accuracy of estimates performed by a developed pro-gram (101 count/tooth;n=20,200 counts) were compared to counts performedmanually (5 counts/tooth;n=975 counts). Reliability of the software and agree-ment between the two approaches were assessed byintraclass correlation coeffi-cient and Bland Altman analysis. The automated module produced reliable andreproducible counts with a higher global precision than the human expert. Althoughthe software is slightly more precise, it shows higher sensitivity to taphonomic dam-ages and does not avoid the trajectory effect described for age-at-death estimationin adults. Likewise, for human counts, global accuracy is acceptable, but underestima-tions increase with age. The quantification of the agreement between the twoapproaches shows a minor bias, and 94% of individuals fall within the intervals ofagreement. Automation gives an impression of objectivity even though the region ofinterest, profile position and parameters are defined manually. The automated systemmay represent a time-saving module that can allow an increase in sample size, whichis particularly stimulating for population-based studies. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-11T16:10:48Z 2022-10-11 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41904 http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41904 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24612 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41904 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24612 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bertrand, B., Vercauteren, M., Cunha, E., Bécart, A., Gosset, D., & Hédouin, V. (2022). Automated age‐at‐death estimation by cementochronology: Essential application or additional complication? American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 179(2), 314–326 2692-7691 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822240036712611840 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1002/ajpa.24612 |