Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49714 |
Resumo: | Assessing carbon storage and sequestration is key for defining effective conservation actions to mitigate climate change. Forest species changes have direct impacts on carbon stocks and may lead to undesirable climate trade-offs. In this paper, we measure aboveground biomass (AGB) and the impact of forest changes on climate regulation through three land policy scenarios by 2030 in continental Portugal. We found that a High intervention scenario, supported by an important increase in "Other coniferous trees" class, will provide 29.5% more of carbon sequestration, whereas a Low intervention scenario, in which there is a moderate increase in all forest classes, will result in an increase of 5.7%. A business as usual (BAU) scenario, supported by an increase in eucalyptus forests and a decrease in autochthonous species, will decrease carbon sequestration (-2.7%), particularly Lisboa, Algarve and North regions. Economic valuation shows that the High intervention scenario will generate the highest economic outcome for climate regulation by 2030. This study provides a spatial-based methodology for monitoring carbon sequestration and new insights about the impact of policies for Green House Gas (GHG) mitigation, supporting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals achievement. |
id |
RCAP_c41ec53dab6f9ef56715283a62ec7975 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/49714 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward?Aboveground biomassClimate regulationEcosystems servicesGlobal changeInVEST modelLand use land coverAssessing carbon storage and sequestration is key for defining effective conservation actions to mitigate climate change. Forest species changes have direct impacts on carbon stocks and may lead to undesirable climate trade-offs. In this paper, we measure aboveground biomass (AGB) and the impact of forest changes on climate regulation through three land policy scenarios by 2030 in continental Portugal. We found that a High intervention scenario, supported by an important increase in "Other coniferous trees" class, will provide 29.5% more of carbon sequestration, whereas a Low intervention scenario, in which there is a moderate increase in all forest classes, will result in an increase of 5.7%. A business as usual (BAU) scenario, supported by an increase in eucalyptus forests and a decrease in autochthonous species, will decrease carbon sequestration (-2.7%), particularly Lisboa, Algarve and North regions. Economic valuation shows that the High intervention scenario will generate the highest economic outcome for climate regulation by 2030. This study provides a spatial-based methodology for monitoring carbon sequestration and new insights about the impact of policies for Green House Gas (GHG) mitigation, supporting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals achievement.SpringerRepositório da Universidade de LisboaCunha, JorgeCampos, Felipe S.David, JoãoPadmanaban, RajchandarCabral, Pedro2021-09-30T10:47:25Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/49714engCunha, J., Campos, F. S., David, J., Padmanaban, R., & Cabral, P. (2021). Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? Environmental monitoring and assessment, 193(9), 547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09336-z0167-636910.1007/s10661-021-09336-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:53:40Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/49714Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:01:19.833728Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
title |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
spellingShingle |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? Cunha, Jorge Aboveground biomass Climate regulation Ecosystems services Global change InVEST model Land use land cover |
title_short |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
title_full |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
title_fullStr |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
title_sort |
Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? |
author |
Cunha, Jorge |
author_facet |
Cunha, Jorge Campos, Felipe S. David, João Padmanaban, Rajchandar Cabral, Pedro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, Felipe S. David, João Padmanaban, Rajchandar Cabral, Pedro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Jorge Campos, Felipe S. David, João Padmanaban, Rajchandar Cabral, Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aboveground biomass Climate regulation Ecosystems services Global change InVEST model Land use land cover |
topic |
Aboveground biomass Climate regulation Ecosystems services Global change InVEST model Land use land cover |
description |
Assessing carbon storage and sequestration is key for defining effective conservation actions to mitigate climate change. Forest species changes have direct impacts on carbon stocks and may lead to undesirable climate trade-offs. In this paper, we measure aboveground biomass (AGB) and the impact of forest changes on climate regulation through three land policy scenarios by 2030 in continental Portugal. We found that a High intervention scenario, supported by an important increase in "Other coniferous trees" class, will provide 29.5% more of carbon sequestration, whereas a Low intervention scenario, in which there is a moderate increase in all forest classes, will result in an increase of 5.7%. A business as usual (BAU) scenario, supported by an increase in eucalyptus forests and a decrease in autochthonous species, will decrease carbon sequestration (-2.7%), particularly Lisboa, Algarve and North regions. Economic valuation shows that the High intervention scenario will generate the highest economic outcome for climate regulation by 2030. This study provides a spatial-based methodology for monitoring carbon sequestration and new insights about the impact of policies for Green House Gas (GHG) mitigation, supporting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals achievement. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-30T10:47:25Z 2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49714 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49714 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, J., Campos, F. S., David, J., Padmanaban, R., & Cabral, P. (2021). Carbon sequestration scenarios in Portugal: which way to go forward? Environmental monitoring and assessment, 193(9), 547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09336-z 0167-6369 10.1007/s10661-021-09336-z |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134561703034880 |