The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/26492 |
Resumo: | Responsible investing, the investment approach that considers Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria, has been gaining relevance in the financial markets. Consequently, ESG rating agencies have become key players in the field of responsible investment. As ESG and factor investing are becoming more important to the asset management industry, we investigate the relationship that investment factors and credit ratings may have with ESG ratings overall, and individual pillars. The dataset includes ESG ratings from Sustainalytics and Refinitiv Eikon, investment factors from Morningstar, and credit ratings from Thomson Reuters. We use a sample of 825 publicly-listed firms in the U.S. at the end of 2021. To examine the relationship, we conduct a descriptive and regression analysis. The descriptive analysis includes analysis of the general descriptive statistics, correlation matrix, and scatter plots. We also include a sectorial analysis of firms to see which sectors have, on average, better or worse ESG ratings. Finally, we split our sample taking into account the 25% worst and best companies in terms of ESG ratings in order to draw more sample-specific conclusions. In the regression analysis, in order to analyse the relationship of our variables, we conduct eight robust regressions involving the Newey-West method. Our findings suggest that an asset manager, by investing in companies according to certain investment factors, or sectors, or with higher credit ratings, may be adding alpha while having a portfolio positively aligned with better ESG ratings. The results are more conclusive according to the Refinitiv Eikon ESG Rating. |
id |
RCAP_c4491396bef57a5181b1f32f700cbe94 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/26492 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratingsESG ratingsCredit ratingsFactor investingResponsible investmentAsset allocationRatings ESGRatings de créditoInvestimento por fatoresInvestimento responsávelAlocação de ativosResponsible investing, the investment approach that considers Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria, has been gaining relevance in the financial markets. Consequently, ESG rating agencies have become key players in the field of responsible investment. As ESG and factor investing are becoming more important to the asset management industry, we investigate the relationship that investment factors and credit ratings may have with ESG ratings overall, and individual pillars. The dataset includes ESG ratings from Sustainalytics and Refinitiv Eikon, investment factors from Morningstar, and credit ratings from Thomson Reuters. We use a sample of 825 publicly-listed firms in the U.S. at the end of 2021. To examine the relationship, we conduct a descriptive and regression analysis. The descriptive analysis includes analysis of the general descriptive statistics, correlation matrix, and scatter plots. We also include a sectorial analysis of firms to see which sectors have, on average, better or worse ESG ratings. Finally, we split our sample taking into account the 25% worst and best companies in terms of ESG ratings in order to draw more sample-specific conclusions. In the regression analysis, in order to analyse the relationship of our variables, we conduct eight robust regressions involving the Newey-West method. Our findings suggest that an asset manager, by investing in companies according to certain investment factors, or sectors, or with higher credit ratings, may be adding alpha while having a portfolio positively aligned with better ESG ratings. The results are more conclusive according to the Refinitiv Eikon ESG Rating.O investimento responsável, a abordagem de investimento que considera os critérios Environmental, Social e Governance (ESG), é cada vez mais relevante nos mercados financeiros. Consequentemente, as agências de ratings ESG tornaram-se num player fundamental. Uma vez que o ESG e o investimento por fatores estão a tornar-se mais relevantes para a indústria de gestão de ativos, a questão científica desta Dissertação investiga a relação que os fatores de investimento e os ratings de crédito podem ter com os ratings ESG. A base de dados inclui ratings ESG da Sustainalytics e Refinitiv Eikon, fatores de investimento da Morningstar, e ratings de crédito da Thomson Reuters. A nossa amostra contém 825 empresas cotadas publicamente nos EUA em 2021. Para examinar a relação, realizámos uma análise descritiva e de regressão. A análise descritiva inclui a análise da estatística descritiva, matriz de correlação, e scatter plots. Incluímos também uma análise setorial para ver que setores têm melhores ou piores ratings ESG. Finalmente, dividimos a nossa amostra tendo em conta as 25% piores e melhores empresas em termos de ratings ESG a fim de tirar conclusões mais concretas. Na análise de regressão, realizámos regressões robustas envolvendo o método Newey-West. Os resultados da presente Dissertação sugerem que um gestor de ativos, ao ter em conta empresas com determinados fatores de investimento, ou com ratings de crédito mais elevados, pode estar a adicionar alpha enquanto tem um portefólio alinhado positivamente com melhores ratings ESG. Os resultados são mais claros relativamente ao rating ESG da Refinitiv Eikon.2022-11-28T15:14:53Z2022-11-04T00:00:00Z2022-11-042022-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/26492TID:203103327engCapucho, Samuel Machadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:54:23Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/26492Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:27:24.593970Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
title |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
spellingShingle |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings Capucho, Samuel Machado ESG ratings Credit ratings Factor investing Responsible investment Asset allocation Ratings ESG Ratings de crédito Investimento por fatores Investimento responsável Alocação de ativos |
title_short |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
title_full |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
title_fullStr |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
title_sort |
The relationship between ESG ratings, investment factors, and credit ratings |
author |
Capucho, Samuel Machado |
author_facet |
Capucho, Samuel Machado |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Capucho, Samuel Machado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ESG ratings Credit ratings Factor investing Responsible investment Asset allocation Ratings ESG Ratings de crédito Investimento por fatores Investimento responsável Alocação de ativos |
topic |
ESG ratings Credit ratings Factor investing Responsible investment Asset allocation Ratings ESG Ratings de crédito Investimento por fatores Investimento responsável Alocação de ativos |
description |
Responsible investing, the investment approach that considers Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria, has been gaining relevance in the financial markets. Consequently, ESG rating agencies have become key players in the field of responsible investment. As ESG and factor investing are becoming more important to the asset management industry, we investigate the relationship that investment factors and credit ratings may have with ESG ratings overall, and individual pillars. The dataset includes ESG ratings from Sustainalytics and Refinitiv Eikon, investment factors from Morningstar, and credit ratings from Thomson Reuters. We use a sample of 825 publicly-listed firms in the U.S. at the end of 2021. To examine the relationship, we conduct a descriptive and regression analysis. The descriptive analysis includes analysis of the general descriptive statistics, correlation matrix, and scatter plots. We also include a sectorial analysis of firms to see which sectors have, on average, better or worse ESG ratings. Finally, we split our sample taking into account the 25% worst and best companies in terms of ESG ratings in order to draw more sample-specific conclusions. In the regression analysis, in order to analyse the relationship of our variables, we conduct eight robust regressions involving the Newey-West method. Our findings suggest that an asset manager, by investing in companies according to certain investment factors, or sectors, or with higher credit ratings, may be adding alpha while having a portfolio positively aligned with better ESG ratings. The results are more conclusive according to the Refinitiv Eikon ESG Rating. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-28T15:14:53Z 2022-11-04T00:00:00Z 2022-11-04 2022-09 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/26492 TID:203103327 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/26492 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:203103327 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134836991983616 |