Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leitão, CB
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fernandes, GO, Azevedo, LP, Araújo, FM, Donato, H, Correia, A
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2331
Resumo: Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival rate, biological complications, technical complications, and clinical behavior of single crowns supported by teeth made up in monolithic zirconia with CAD/CAM technology. Study selection: An extensive electronic search was conducted through Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Additional manual search was performed on the references of included articles to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently performed the selection and electronic and manual search. Results: From nine articles included, there was a total of 594 participants and 1657 single-tooth restorations with a mean exposure time of 1.07 years, and follow-up period between 0.3 and 2.1 years. All studies showed a moderate level of quality, with a consequent moderate possibility of associated bias, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with survival rate (SR) ranging between 91% to 100%. Bleeding on probing (BOP) were reported with an average value of 29.12%. Marginal integrity showed high success rate values for the observation periods, except for one that included patients with bruxism which obtained a SR of 31.60%. Failures and/or fractures, mostly total and requiring replacement, were observed in three studies. Linear regression showed that there was no statistical correlation between survival rate and type of cementation and the average years of follow-up (p=0.730 e p=0.454). There was high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 93.74% and Q = 79.672). Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, monolithic zirconia might be considered as a possible option for restoring single crowns, especially in the posterior zone.
id RCAP_c484e554764d43b58ca0ab7ba882ee05
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2331
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysisDesenho de de Prótese DentáriaMateriais DentáriosZircónioPurpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival rate, biological complications, technical complications, and clinical behavior of single crowns supported by teeth made up in monolithic zirconia with CAD/CAM technology. Study selection: An extensive electronic search was conducted through Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Additional manual search was performed on the references of included articles to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently performed the selection and electronic and manual search. Results: From nine articles included, there was a total of 594 participants and 1657 single-tooth restorations with a mean exposure time of 1.07 years, and follow-up period between 0.3 and 2.1 years. All studies showed a moderate level of quality, with a consequent moderate possibility of associated bias, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with survival rate (SR) ranging between 91% to 100%. Bleeding on probing (BOP) were reported with an average value of 29.12%. Marginal integrity showed high success rate values for the observation periods, except for one that included patients with bruxism which obtained a SR of 31.60%. Failures and/or fractures, mostly total and requiring replacement, were observed in three studies. Linear regression showed that there was no statistical correlation between survival rate and type of cementation and the average years of follow-up (p=0.730 e p=0.454). There was high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 93.74% and Q = 79.672). Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, monolithic zirconia might be considered as a possible option for restoring single crowns, especially in the posterior zone.RIHUCLeitão, CBFernandes, GOAzevedo, LPAraújo, FMDonato, HCorreia, A2021-10-11T10:58:42Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2331engJ Prosthodont Res . 2021 Oct 6. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_0008110.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00081info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:23:44Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2331Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:04:47.582525Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
Leitão, CB
Desenho de de Prótese Dentária
Materiais Dentários
Zircónio
title_short Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Leitão, CB
author_facet Leitão, CB
Fernandes, GO
Azevedo, LP
Araújo, FM
Donato, H
Correia, A
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, GO
Azevedo, LP
Araújo, FM
Donato, H
Correia, A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leitão, CB
Fernandes, GO
Azevedo, LP
Araújo, FM
Donato, H
Correia, A
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desenho de de Prótese Dentária
Materiais Dentários
Zircónio
topic Desenho de de Prótese Dentária
Materiais Dentários
Zircónio
description Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival rate, biological complications, technical complications, and clinical behavior of single crowns supported by teeth made up in monolithic zirconia with CAD/CAM technology. Study selection: An extensive electronic search was conducted through Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Additional manual search was performed on the references of included articles to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently performed the selection and electronic and manual search. Results: From nine articles included, there was a total of 594 participants and 1657 single-tooth restorations with a mean exposure time of 1.07 years, and follow-up period between 0.3 and 2.1 years. All studies showed a moderate level of quality, with a consequent moderate possibility of associated bias, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with survival rate (SR) ranging between 91% to 100%. Bleeding on probing (BOP) were reported with an average value of 29.12%. Marginal integrity showed high success rate values for the observation periods, except for one that included patients with bruxism which obtained a SR of 31.60%. Failures and/or fractures, mostly total and requiring replacement, were observed in three studies. Linear regression showed that there was no statistical correlation between survival rate and type of cementation and the average years of follow-up (p=0.730 e p=0.454). There was high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 93.74% and Q = 79.672). Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, monolithic zirconia might be considered as a possible option for restoring single crowns, especially in the posterior zone.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-11T10:58:42Z
2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2331
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2331
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Prosthodont Res . 2021 Oct 6. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00081
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00081
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131709639229440