Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Malheiro, R
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rocha-Pereira, N, Duro, R, Pereira, C, Alves, CL, Correia, S
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143205
Resumo: Objectives. To assess whether electronic records data could improve the efficiency, exhaustiveness, and representativeness of SSI surveillance by selecting a group of high-risk patients for manual review. Methods. Colorectal surgeries (2016–2018) and cholecystectomies (2017–2018) were selected. Post-surgical antibiotic use, positive culture, C-reactive protein (CRP) values, body temperature, leukocyte count, surgical re-intervention, admission to the emergency room, and hospital readmission were retrieved. For representativeness, procedures registered in HAI-Net were compared with non-included procedures, and the validity of each variable (or combination) was tested considering the presence of SSI as the gold standard. The proportion of procedures flagged for manual review by each criterion was estimated. Results. Little more than 50% of procedures were included in HAI-Net (SSI risk: 10.6% for colorectal and 2.9% for cholecystectomies). Non-included procedures showed higher proportions of infection markers. Antibiotic use and CRP >100 mg/dl presented the highest sensitivity for both surgical groups, while antibiotic use achieved the highest positive predictive value in both groups (22% and 21%, respectively) and flagged fewer colorectal procedures (47.7%). Conclusions. Current SSI surveillance has major limitations. Thus, the reported incidence seems unreliable and underestimated. Antibiotic use appears to be the best criterion to select a sub-sample of procedures for manual review, improving the exhaustiveness and efficiency of the system.
id RCAP_c51ae475d5237936160649839afa900e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/143205
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiencySemi-automatedSurveillanceSSIAntibioticRepresentativenessEfficiencyObjectives. To assess whether electronic records data could improve the efficiency, exhaustiveness, and representativeness of SSI surveillance by selecting a group of high-risk patients for manual review. Methods. Colorectal surgeries (2016–2018) and cholecystectomies (2017–2018) were selected. Post-surgical antibiotic use, positive culture, C-reactive protein (CRP) values, body temperature, leukocyte count, surgical re-intervention, admission to the emergency room, and hospital readmission were retrieved. For representativeness, procedures registered in HAI-Net were compared with non-included procedures, and the validity of each variable (or combination) was tested considering the presence of SSI as the gold standard. The proportion of procedures flagged for manual review by each criterion was estimated. Results. Little more than 50% of procedures were included in HAI-Net (SSI risk: 10.6% for colorectal and 2.9% for cholecystectomies). Non-included procedures showed higher proportions of infection markers. Antibiotic use and CRP >100 mg/dl presented the highest sensitivity for both surgical groups, while antibiotic use achieved the highest positive predictive value in both groups (22% and 21%, respectively) and flagged fewer colorectal procedures (47.7%). Conclusions. Current SSI surveillance has major limitations. Thus, the reported incidence seems unreliable and underestimated. Antibiotic use appears to be the best criterion to select a sub-sample of procedures for manual review, improving the exhaustiveness and efficiency of the system.Elsevier20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/143205eng1201-971210.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.035Malheiro, RRocha-Pereira, NDuro, RPereira, CAlves, CLCorreia, Sinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-09-27T09:42:23Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/143205Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-27T09:42:23Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
title Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
spellingShingle Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
Malheiro, R
Semi-automated
Surveillance
SSI
Antibiotic
Representativeness
Efficiency
title_short Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
title_full Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
title_fullStr Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
title_sort Validation of a semi-automated surveillance system for surgical site infections: Improving exhaustiveness, representativeness, and efficiency
author Malheiro, R
author_facet Malheiro, R
Rocha-Pereira, N
Duro, R
Pereira, C
Alves, CL
Correia, S
author_role author
author2 Rocha-Pereira, N
Duro, R
Pereira, C
Alves, CL
Correia, S
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Malheiro, R
Rocha-Pereira, N
Duro, R
Pereira, C
Alves, CL
Correia, S
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Semi-automated
Surveillance
SSI
Antibiotic
Representativeness
Efficiency
topic Semi-automated
Surveillance
SSI
Antibiotic
Representativeness
Efficiency
description Objectives. To assess whether electronic records data could improve the efficiency, exhaustiveness, and representativeness of SSI surveillance by selecting a group of high-risk patients for manual review. Methods. Colorectal surgeries (2016–2018) and cholecystectomies (2017–2018) were selected. Post-surgical antibiotic use, positive culture, C-reactive protein (CRP) values, body temperature, leukocyte count, surgical re-intervention, admission to the emergency room, and hospital readmission were retrieved. For representativeness, procedures registered in HAI-Net were compared with non-included procedures, and the validity of each variable (or combination) was tested considering the presence of SSI as the gold standard. The proportion of procedures flagged for manual review by each criterion was estimated. Results. Little more than 50% of procedures were included in HAI-Net (SSI risk: 10.6% for colorectal and 2.9% for cholecystectomies). Non-included procedures showed higher proportions of infection markers. Antibiotic use and CRP >100 mg/dl presented the highest sensitivity for both surgical groups, while antibiotic use achieved the highest positive predictive value in both groups (22% and 21%, respectively) and flagged fewer colorectal procedures (47.7%). Conclusions. Current SSI surveillance has major limitations. Thus, the reported incidence seems unreliable and underestimated. Antibiotic use appears to be the best criterion to select a sub-sample of procedures for manual review, improving the exhaustiveness and efficiency of the system.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143205
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143205
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1201-9712
10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.035
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817548430581432320