Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018227.05 |
Resumo: | This paper analyses the institutionalization of rural social movements during the Lula government in Brazil, in light of a worsening of land reform in the period as well as continued government support of traditional rural elites, resulting in the expansion of large landholdings at the expense of family held small holdings. It questions the major theories addressing this phenomenon and its outcomes, largely centred on co-option processes and presents an alternative explanation, stemming from a series of interrelated factors until now generally not considered in the literature. It argues that these academic debates need to acknowledge the existence of a role played by identity, creativity, agency, and political opportunities of these actors, as well as their predefined meanings and strategies. |
id |
RCAP_c75a5b0336f46b5ad1121e8579822723 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22304 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency.Institucionalização dos movimentos sociais agrários durante o governo de Lula e o declínio da reforma agrária no Brasil: cooptação, identidade política e agênciaBrasilmovimentos sociais ruraisreforma agrárialulismocooptaçãoBrazilrural social movementsland reformlulismco-option.This paper analyses the institutionalization of rural social movements during the Lula government in Brazil, in light of a worsening of land reform in the period as well as continued government support of traditional rural elites, resulting in the expansion of large landholdings at the expense of family held small holdings. It questions the major theories addressing this phenomenon and its outcomes, largely centred on co-option processes and presents an alternative explanation, stemming from a series of interrelated factors until now generally not considered in the literature. It argues that these academic debates need to acknowledge the existence of a role played by identity, creativity, agency, and political opportunities of these actors, as well as their predefined meanings and strategies..Este artigo analisa a institucionalização dos movimentos sociais rurais durante o governo de Lula no Brasil, à luz de um decréscimo nas políticas de reforma agrária e de um apoio contínuo do governo às elites rurais tradicionais do país, resultando na expansão dos grandes latifúndios em detrimento das pequenas propriedades familiares. Questiona as principais teorias sobre estes fenómenos, em grande parte centradas em processos de cooptação, e apresenta uma explicação alternativa, baseada num conjunto de fatores inter-relacionados e até agora pouco considerados pela literatura. Argumenta que, ao invés de ver esses processos como resultado de atração e/ou manipulação de líderes, é necessário que os debates académicos reconheçam a importância do papel desempenhado pela identidade, criatividade, agência, oportunidades políticas dos atores e estratégias predefinidas.Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa2018-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018227.05https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018227.05Análise Social; Vol. 53 N.º 227 (2018); 362-3872182-29990003-2573reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/22304https://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/22304/16431Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Análise Socialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSipiriano Nogueira, Aico2024-03-09T06:14:39Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22304Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:00:10.155118Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency . Institucionalização dos movimentos sociais agrários durante o governo de Lula e o declínio da reforma agrária no Brasil: cooptação, identidade política e agência |
title |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency |
spellingShingle |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency Sipiriano Nogueira, Aico Brasil movimentos sociais rurais reforma agrária lulismo cooptação Brazil rural social movements land reform lulism co-option . |
title_short |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency |
title_full |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency |
title_fullStr |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency |
title_full_unstemmed |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency |
title_sort |
Institutionalization of rural social movements in the Lula government and the decline of land reform in Brazil: co-option, political identity, and agency |
author |
Sipiriano Nogueira, Aico |
author_facet |
Sipiriano Nogueira, Aico |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sipiriano Nogueira, Aico |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brasil movimentos sociais rurais reforma agrária lulismo cooptação Brazil rural social movements land reform lulism co-option . |
topic |
Brasil movimentos sociais rurais reforma agrária lulismo cooptação Brazil rural social movements land reform lulism co-option . |
description |
This paper analyses the institutionalization of rural social movements during the Lula government in Brazil, in light of a worsening of land reform in the period as well as continued government support of traditional rural elites, resulting in the expansion of large landholdings at the expense of family held small holdings. It questions the major theories addressing this phenomenon and its outcomes, largely centred on co-option processes and presents an alternative explanation, stemming from a series of interrelated factors until now generally not considered in the literature. It argues that these academic debates need to acknowledge the existence of a role played by identity, creativity, agency, and political opportunities of these actors, as well as their predefined meanings and strategies. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018227.05 https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018227.05 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018227.05 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/22304 https://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/22304/16431 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Análise Social info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Análise Social |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Social; Vol. 53 N.º 227 (2018); 362-387 2182-2999 0003-2573 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799129873314217984 |