The New Package Travel Directive

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho et al, Ana Branca
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Livro
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/4779
Resumo: The greatest problem of the Directive is its approach of full harmonisation. The Directive will forces some Member States to lower their high protection standards. Member States will not have any regulatory freedom anymore! Under the pressure of consumer associations, Art 4 of the Directive changed from its previous minimum standard principle to the new principle of full harmonisation. Unless otherwise provided in the Directive, Member States are barred from introducing any deviating provisions in their national law. As a consequence, all the countries has to lower its consumer protection to the sometimes lower standard of the Directive. All the consumers, but also traders, will see some of their legal positions deteriorate. It is wrong to criticise the nation legislature for this development. The national parliaments are bound to correctly transpose EU law. Nevertheless, I deplore that the transition from minimum to full harmonisation leads to a deliberate reduction of the level of traveller protection in Member States. Should provisions of the full harmonisation Directive be sufficient to erode national standards that are firmly established? In our opinion, one should rather pay attention to the principle of subsidiarity underlying the EU Treaty of Lisbon (Art. 5 para 3 EUV and Protocol Nr. 2). The Treaty states in clear words that, in the future, the method of full harmonisation of EU consumer protection should only be used if there is a significant advantage over the measures at national level. I doubt that this is the case with respect to the Package Travel Directive. It is questionable whether there exists a common European market for package travel products in the first place. How many tourists book digitally or locally their package holiday in Spain with an English or French organiser? Almost nobody!
id RCAP_c78cddd7d3b77c9304c8cf7ab2c55d26
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipv.pt:10400.19/4779
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The New Package Travel DirectiveAdministrativo, Comunitario, TurismoThe greatest problem of the Directive is its approach of full harmonisation. The Directive will forces some Member States to lower their high protection standards. Member States will not have any regulatory freedom anymore! Under the pressure of consumer associations, Art 4 of the Directive changed from its previous minimum standard principle to the new principle of full harmonisation. Unless otherwise provided in the Directive, Member States are barred from introducing any deviating provisions in their national law. As a consequence, all the countries has to lower its consumer protection to the sometimes lower standard of the Directive. All the consumers, but also traders, will see some of their legal positions deteriorate. It is wrong to criticise the nation legislature for this development. The national parliaments are bound to correctly transpose EU law. Nevertheless, I deplore that the transition from minimum to full harmonisation leads to a deliberate reduction of the level of traveller protection in Member States. Should provisions of the full harmonisation Directive be sufficient to erode national standards that are firmly established? In our opinion, one should rather pay attention to the principle of subsidiarity underlying the EU Treaty of Lisbon (Art. 5 para 3 EUV and Protocol Nr. 2). The Treaty states in clear words that, in the future, the method of full harmonisation of EU consumer protection should only be used if there is a significant advantage over the measures at national level. I doubt that this is the case with respect to the Package Travel Directive. It is questionable whether there exists a common European market for package travel products in the first place. How many tourists book digitally or locally their package holiday in Spain with an English or French organiser? Almost nobody!Eshte/InatelF.Morandi and C.Torres (Editors)Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de ViseuCarvalho et al, Ana Branca2018-01-15T16:06:00Z2017-10-092017-10-09T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/4779enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-16T15:27:29Zoai:repositorio.ipv.pt:10400.19/4779Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:43:16.952Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The New Package Travel Directive
title The New Package Travel Directive
spellingShingle The New Package Travel Directive
Carvalho et al, Ana Branca
Administrativo, Comunitario, Turismo
title_short The New Package Travel Directive
title_full The New Package Travel Directive
title_fullStr The New Package Travel Directive
title_full_unstemmed The New Package Travel Directive
title_sort The New Package Travel Directive
author Carvalho et al, Ana Branca
author_facet Carvalho et al, Ana Branca
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Viseu
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho et al, Ana Branca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Administrativo, Comunitario, Turismo
topic Administrativo, Comunitario, Turismo
description The greatest problem of the Directive is its approach of full harmonisation. The Directive will forces some Member States to lower their high protection standards. Member States will not have any regulatory freedom anymore! Under the pressure of consumer associations, Art 4 of the Directive changed from its previous minimum standard principle to the new principle of full harmonisation. Unless otherwise provided in the Directive, Member States are barred from introducing any deviating provisions in their national law. As a consequence, all the countries has to lower its consumer protection to the sometimes lower standard of the Directive. All the consumers, but also traders, will see some of their legal positions deteriorate. It is wrong to criticise the nation legislature for this development. The national parliaments are bound to correctly transpose EU law. Nevertheless, I deplore that the transition from minimum to full harmonisation leads to a deliberate reduction of the level of traveller protection in Member States. Should provisions of the full harmonisation Directive be sufficient to erode national standards that are firmly established? In our opinion, one should rather pay attention to the principle of subsidiarity underlying the EU Treaty of Lisbon (Art. 5 para 3 EUV and Protocol Nr. 2). The Treaty states in clear words that, in the future, the method of full harmonisation of EU consumer protection should only be used if there is a significant advantage over the measures at national level. I doubt that this is the case with respect to the Package Travel Directive. It is questionable whether there exists a common European market for package travel products in the first place. How many tourists book digitally or locally their package holiday in Spain with an English or French organiser? Almost nobody!
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-09
2017-10-09T00:00:00Z
2018-01-15T16:06:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/book
format book
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/4779
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/4779
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv F.Morandi and C.Torres (Editors)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv F.Morandi and C.Torres (Editors)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130902073180160