Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25274 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate demographic features, risk factors, bacterial isolates, antibiotic resistance patterns and therapeutic approach of bacterial keratitis over a period of 10 years in a tertiary referral hospital in Lisbon. M E T HO D S : Retrospective review of all bacterial keratitis diagnosed between 2009 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients were diagnosed with bacterial keratitis between 2009 and 2019. Mean age was 54.77 years and 55% of patients were female. Based on first clinical observation, 72.3% of patients were classified as having serious keratitis and 60.86% were managed as in-patients. Contact lenses were the major risk factor identified (30.3%), followed by previous keratoplasty (11.1%) and ocular trauma (10.9%). Cultures were positive for bacteria in 56.86% of patients, with gram-negative bacteria comprising more than half of the isolates (52.26%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common single isolate (16.3%). Monotherapy with fluoroquinolones was given to 5.7% of patients and 75.4% were treated with fortified drops of ceftazidime and vancomycin. As for outcomes, 41 patients (11.7%) were submitted to a corneal transplant and five patients were eviscerated. CONCLUSION: Bacterial keratitis is a potentially blinding condition that leads to a great number of emergency department visits and inpatient care. Over the last 10 years, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been the single most common bacterial isolate and contact lens wear the most frequent risk factor for bacterial keratitis in our center. Identifying bacterial isolates and their resistance pattern is of utmost importance for optimal management of patients. |
id |
RCAP_c899de07ef24fb8daa3448290c474548 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/25274 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of CulturesQueratites Bacterianas: Uma Revisão Retrospectiva de 10 Anos de CulturasArtigos OriginaisINTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate demographic features, risk factors, bacterial isolates, antibiotic resistance patterns and therapeutic approach of bacterial keratitis over a period of 10 years in a tertiary referral hospital in Lisbon. M E T HO D S : Retrospective review of all bacterial keratitis diagnosed between 2009 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients were diagnosed with bacterial keratitis between 2009 and 2019. Mean age was 54.77 years and 55% of patients were female. Based on first clinical observation, 72.3% of patients were classified as having serious keratitis and 60.86% were managed as in-patients. Contact lenses were the major risk factor identified (30.3%), followed by previous keratoplasty (11.1%) and ocular trauma (10.9%). Cultures were positive for bacteria in 56.86% of patients, with gram-negative bacteria comprising more than half of the isolates (52.26%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common single isolate (16.3%). Monotherapy with fluoroquinolones was given to 5.7% of patients and 75.4% were treated with fortified drops of ceftazidime and vancomycin. As for outcomes, 41 patients (11.7%) were submitted to a corneal transplant and five patients were eviscerated. CONCLUSION: Bacterial keratitis is a potentially blinding condition that leads to a great number of emergency department visits and inpatient care. Over the last 10 years, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been the single most common bacterial isolate and contact lens wear the most frequent risk factor for bacterial keratitis in our center. Identifying bacterial isolates and their resistance pattern is of utmost importance for optimal management of patients.INTRODUÇÃO: O objectivo do estudo foi avaliar as características demográficas, factores de risco, isolados bacterianos, padrões de resistência a antimicrobianos e abordagem terapêutica das queratites bacterianas nos últimos 10 anos num centro de referência terciário em Lisboa. MÉTODOS: Revisão restrospectiva de todas as queratites bacterianas diagnosticadas entre 2009 e 2019. RESULTADOS: Um total de 350 doentes foram diagnosticados com queratite bacteriana entre 2009 e 2019. A idade média foi de 54,77 anos e 55% dos doentes eram do sexo feminino. Com base na primeira avaliação clínica, 72,3% das infecções foram classificadas como graves e 60,86% dos doentes foram tratados em regime de internamento. O uso de lentes de contacto foi o factor de risco major identificado (30,3%), seguido de queratoplastia prévia (11,1%) e trauma ocular (10,9%). As culturas foram positivas para bactérias em 56,86% dos doentes, sendo que os gram-negativos representaram mais de metade dos isolados (52,26%). A Pseudomonas aeruginosa foi o agente isolado mais frequentemente (16,3%). A monoterapia com fluoroquinolonas foi prescrita a 5,7% dos doentes, enquanto 75,4% dos doentes foram tratados com colírios fortificados de ceftazidima e vancomicina. No que diz respeito a outcomes, 41 doentes (11,7%) foram submetidos a transplante de córnea e cinco foram eviscerados. CONCLUSÃO: A queratite bacteriana é uma patologia que leva a um grande número de visitas aos serviços de urgência e necessidade de cuidados em regime de internamento. Nos últimos 10 anos, a Pseudomonas aeruginosa foi o agente isolado com maior frequência e o uso de lentes de contacto o factor de risco mais importante. A identificação dos isolados bacterianos e dos seus padrões de resistência é fundamental para poder optimizar os cuidados prestados aos doentes.Ajnet2022-06-30T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25274eng1646-69501646-6950Serras-Pereira, RitaMaleita, DiogoVieira, MiguelCrisóstomo, SaraAnjos, RitaBatalha, CarlosFernandes, FernandoAlves, NunoMaduro, VítorCandelária, PedroFeijão, Joãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-10-13T20:30:15Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/25274Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:01:47.161061Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures Queratites Bacterianas: Uma Revisão Retrospectiva de 10 Anos de Culturas |
title |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures |
spellingShingle |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures Serras-Pereira, Rita Artigos Originais |
title_short |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures |
title_full |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures |
title_fullStr |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures |
title_sort |
Bacterial Keratitis: A Retrospective Review of 10 Years of Cultures |
author |
Serras-Pereira, Rita |
author_facet |
Serras-Pereira, Rita Maleita, Diogo Vieira, Miguel Crisóstomo, Sara Anjos, Rita Batalha, Carlos Fernandes, Fernando Alves, Nuno Maduro, Vítor Candelária, Pedro Feijão, João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maleita, Diogo Vieira, Miguel Crisóstomo, Sara Anjos, Rita Batalha, Carlos Fernandes, Fernando Alves, Nuno Maduro, Vítor Candelária, Pedro Feijão, João |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Serras-Pereira, Rita Maleita, Diogo Vieira, Miguel Crisóstomo, Sara Anjos, Rita Batalha, Carlos Fernandes, Fernando Alves, Nuno Maduro, Vítor Candelária, Pedro Feijão, João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artigos Originais |
topic |
Artigos Originais |
description |
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate demographic features, risk factors, bacterial isolates, antibiotic resistance patterns and therapeutic approach of bacterial keratitis over a period of 10 years in a tertiary referral hospital in Lisbon. M E T HO D S : Retrospective review of all bacterial keratitis diagnosed between 2009 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients were diagnosed with bacterial keratitis between 2009 and 2019. Mean age was 54.77 years and 55% of patients were female. Based on first clinical observation, 72.3% of patients were classified as having serious keratitis and 60.86% were managed as in-patients. Contact lenses were the major risk factor identified (30.3%), followed by previous keratoplasty (11.1%) and ocular trauma (10.9%). Cultures were positive for bacteria in 56.86% of patients, with gram-negative bacteria comprising more than half of the isolates (52.26%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common single isolate (16.3%). Monotherapy with fluoroquinolones was given to 5.7% of patients and 75.4% were treated with fortified drops of ceftazidime and vancomycin. As for outcomes, 41 patients (11.7%) were submitted to a corneal transplant and five patients were eviscerated. CONCLUSION: Bacterial keratitis is a potentially blinding condition that leads to a great number of emergency department visits and inpatient care. Over the last 10 years, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been the single most common bacterial isolate and contact lens wear the most frequent risk factor for bacterial keratitis in our center. Identifying bacterial isolates and their resistance pattern is of utmost importance for optimal management of patients. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-30T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25274 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25274 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1646-6950 1646-6950 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ajnet |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ajnet |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130482768609280 |