Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amarante, J
Data de Publicação: 1996
Outros Autores: Reis, J, Santa-Comba, A, Malheiro, E
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605
Resumo: The authors report their clinical experience after seventy-six forearm island flaps, and analyse the different possible forearm flap options in hand reconstructions. The different flaps-based on the radial, ulnar, interosseous and septocutaneous ulnar vessels-are compared in what, concerns the importance of the sacrificed artery, adverse sequelae of the donor area and their versatility to close large skin defects as well as their capacity to reach distal areas of the hand. Their ability to provide sensate coverage and to replace bone and tendons is also compared.
id RCAP_c8a12e1767484b8ff812e290194a51ca
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2605
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.A utilização de retalhos antebraquiais em ilha na cirurgia reconstrutiva da mão. Qual a melhor opção?The authors report their clinical experience after seventy-six forearm island flaps, and analyse the different possible forearm flap options in hand reconstructions. The different flaps-based on the radial, ulnar, interosseous and septocutaneous ulnar vessels-are compared in what, concerns the importance of the sacrificed artery, adverse sequelae of the donor area and their versatility to close large skin defects as well as their capacity to reach distal areas of the hand. Their ability to provide sensate coverage and to replace bone and tendons is also compared.The authors report their clinical experience after seventy-six forearm island flaps, and analyse the different possible forearm flap options in hand reconstructions. The different flaps-based on the radial, ulnar, interosseous and septocutaneous ulnar vessels-are compared in what, concerns the importance of the sacrificed artery, adverse sequelae of the donor area and their versatility to close large skin defects as well as their capacity to reach distal areas of the hand. Their ability to provide sensate coverage and to replace bone and tendons is also compared.Ordem dos Médicos1996-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2605Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 No. 7-9 (1996): Julho-Setembro; 211-8Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 N.º 7-9 (1996): Julho-Setembro; 211-81646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605/2017Amarante, JReis, JSanta-Comba, AMalheiro, Einfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:00:49Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2605Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:17:51.145632Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
A utilização de retalhos antebraquiais em ilha na cirurgia reconstrutiva da mão. Qual a melhor opção?
title Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
spellingShingle Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
Amarante, J
title_short Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
title_full Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
title_fullStr Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
title_sort Utilization of forearm island flaps in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Which one is the best option?.
author Amarante, J
author_facet Amarante, J
Reis, J
Santa-Comba, A
Malheiro, E
author_role author
author2 Reis, J
Santa-Comba, A
Malheiro, E
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amarante, J
Reis, J
Santa-Comba, A
Malheiro, E
description The authors report their clinical experience after seventy-six forearm island flaps, and analyse the different possible forearm flap options in hand reconstructions. The different flaps-based on the radial, ulnar, interosseous and septocutaneous ulnar vessels-are compared in what, concerns the importance of the sacrificed artery, adverse sequelae of the donor area and their versatility to close large skin defects as well as their capacity to reach distal areas of the hand. Their ability to provide sensate coverage and to replace bone and tendons is also compared.
publishDate 1996
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1996-09-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2605
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/2605
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/2605/2017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 No. 7-9 (1996): Julho-Setembro; 211-8
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 9 N.º 7-9 (1996): Julho-Setembro; 211-8
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130631439908864

Registros relacionados