Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Insulin resistance is the pathophysiological key to explain metabolic syndrome. Although clearly useful, the Homeostasis Model Assessment index (an insulin resistance measurement) hasn’t been systematically applied in clinical practice. One of the main reasons is the discrepancy in cut-off values reported in different populations. We sought to evaluate in a Portuguese population the ideal cut-off for Homeostasis Model Assessment index and assess its relationship with metabolic syndrome.Material and Methods: We selected a cohort of individuals admitted electively in a Cardiology ward with a BMI < 25 Kg/m2 and no abnormalities in glucose metabolism (fasting plasma glucose < 100 mg/dL and no diabetes). The 90th percentile of the Homeostasis Model Assessment index distribution was used to obtain the ideal cut-off for insulin resistance. We also selected a validation cohort of 300 individuals (no exclusion criteria applied).Results: From 7 000 individuals, and after the exclusion criteria, there were left 1 784 individuals. The 90th percentile for Homeostasis Model Assessment index was 2.33. In the validation cohort, applying that cut-off, we have 49.3% of individuals with insulin resistance. However, only 69.9% of the metabolic syndrome patients had insulin resistance according to that cut-off. By ROC curve analysis, the ideal cut-off for metabolic syndrome is 2.41. Homeostasis Model Assessment index correlated with BMI (r = 0.371, p < 0.001) and is an independent predictor of the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR 19.4, 95% CI 6.6 – 57.2, p < 0.001).Discussion: Our study showed that in a Portuguese population of patients admitted electively in a Cardiology ward, 2.33 is the Homeostasis Model Assessment index cut-off for insulin resistance and 2.41 for metabolic syndrome.Conclusion: Homeostasis Model Assessment index is directly correlated with BMI and is an independent predictor of metabolic syndrome.Keywords: Glucose Tolerance Test; Homeostasis; Insulin Resistance Metabolic Syndrome. |
id |
RCAP_c96490c197b2768c95876a23f8229af7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5180 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology WardLimiar do Índice Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) para Resistência à Insulina numa População de Doentes Admitidos Electivamente numa Enfermaria Portuguesa de CardiologiaIntroduction: Insulin resistance is the pathophysiological key to explain metabolic syndrome. Although clearly useful, the Homeostasis Model Assessment index (an insulin resistance measurement) hasn’t been systematically applied in clinical practice. One of the main reasons is the discrepancy in cut-off values reported in different populations. We sought to evaluate in a Portuguese population the ideal cut-off for Homeostasis Model Assessment index and assess its relationship with metabolic syndrome.Material and Methods: We selected a cohort of individuals admitted electively in a Cardiology ward with a BMI < 25 Kg/m2 and no abnormalities in glucose metabolism (fasting plasma glucose < 100 mg/dL and no diabetes). The 90th percentile of the Homeostasis Model Assessment index distribution was used to obtain the ideal cut-off for insulin resistance. We also selected a validation cohort of 300 individuals (no exclusion criteria applied).Results: From 7 000 individuals, and after the exclusion criteria, there were left 1 784 individuals. The 90th percentile for Homeostasis Model Assessment index was 2.33. In the validation cohort, applying that cut-off, we have 49.3% of individuals with insulin resistance. However, only 69.9% of the metabolic syndrome patients had insulin resistance according to that cut-off. By ROC curve analysis, the ideal cut-off for metabolic syndrome is 2.41. Homeostasis Model Assessment index correlated with BMI (r = 0.371, p < 0.001) and is an independent predictor of the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR 19.4, 95% CI 6.6 – 57.2, p < 0.001).Discussion: Our study showed that in a Portuguese population of patients admitted electively in a Cardiology ward, 2.33 is the Homeostasis Model Assessment index cut-off for insulin resistance and 2.41 for metabolic syndrome.Conclusion: Homeostasis Model Assessment index is directly correlated with BMI and is an independent predictor of metabolic syndrome.Keywords: Glucose Tolerance Test; Homeostasis; Insulin Resistance Metabolic Syndrome.Introdução: A resistência à insulina é a chave fisiopatológica de explicação da Síndrome Metabólica. Apesar de claramente útil, o índice Homeostasis Model Assessment (uma medição da resistência à insulina) não tem sido aplicado sistematicamente na prática clínica. Uma das principais razões relaciona-se com a discrepância de valores limiares reportados em diferentes populações. Procurámos avaliar uma população portuguesa o valor limiar ideal e avaliar a sua relação com a Síndrome Metabólica.Material e Métodos: Selecionámos uma coorte de indivíduos admitidos eletivamente numa enfermaria de cardiologia com um IMC < 25 Kg/m2 e sem anomalias do metabolismo da glicose (glicémia em jejum < 100 mg/dL e sem diabetes). Utilizámos o percentil 90 da distribuição do índice Homeostasis Model Assessment para seleção do limiar adequado para resistência à insulina. Selecionou-se também uma coorte de validação composta por 300 indivíduos, sem aplicação dos critérios de exclusão referidos anteriormente.Resultados: De uma população de 7 000 indivíduos e após aplicação dos critérios de exclusão, ficámos com 1 784 indivíduos para análise. O percentil 90 do índice foi 2,33. Na coorte de validação, aplicando esse limiar, 49,3% dos indivíduos apresentam resistência à insulina. Contudo, apenas 69,9% dos doentes com síndrome metabólica apresentam resistência à insulina com esse limiar. Por análise das curvas ROC, o limiar ideal para síndrome metabólica é 2,41. O índice Homeostasis Model Assessment correlacionou-se com o IMC (r = 0,371, p < 0,001) e é um preditor independente de presença de síndrome metabólica (OR 19,4, IC 95% 6,6 – 57,2, p < 0,001).Discussão: O nosso estudo mostrou que numa população portuguesa de doentes admitidos eletivamente numa enfermaria de cardiologia, o limiar pelo índice Homeostasis Model Assessment para resistência à insulina é 2,33 e para síndrome metabólica é 2,41.Conclusão: O índice Homeostasis Model Assessment correlacionou-se com o IMC e é um preditor independente de síndrome metabólica.Palavras-chave: Teste de Tolerância a Glicose; Homeostase; Resistência à Insulina; Síndrome Metabólica; Doenças Cardiovasculares.Ordem dos Médicos2014-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfimage/tiffimage/tiffapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/jpeghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5180Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2014): July-August; 473-479Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 4 (2014): Julho-Agosto; 473-4791646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/4026https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7096https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7310https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7311https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7312https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7335https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7336https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7372Timóteo, Ana TeresaMiranda, FernandoCarmo, Miguel MotaFerreira, Rui Cruzinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:04:14Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5180Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:02.518896Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward Limiar do Índice Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) para Resistência à Insulina numa População de Doentes Admitidos Electivamente numa Enfermaria Portuguesa de Cardiologia |
title |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward |
spellingShingle |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward Timóteo, Ana Teresa |
title_short |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward |
title_full |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward |
title_fullStr |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward |
title_sort |
Optimal Cut-Off Value for Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Index of Insulin-Resistance in a Population of Patients Admitted Electively in a Portuguese Cardiology Ward |
author |
Timóteo, Ana Teresa |
author_facet |
Timóteo, Ana Teresa Miranda, Fernando Carmo, Miguel Mota Ferreira, Rui Cruz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miranda, Fernando Carmo, Miguel Mota Ferreira, Rui Cruz |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Timóteo, Ana Teresa Miranda, Fernando Carmo, Miguel Mota Ferreira, Rui Cruz |
description |
Introduction: Insulin resistance is the pathophysiological key to explain metabolic syndrome. Although clearly useful, the Homeostasis Model Assessment index (an insulin resistance measurement) hasn’t been systematically applied in clinical practice. One of the main reasons is the discrepancy in cut-off values reported in different populations. We sought to evaluate in a Portuguese population the ideal cut-off for Homeostasis Model Assessment index and assess its relationship with metabolic syndrome.Material and Methods: We selected a cohort of individuals admitted electively in a Cardiology ward with a BMI < 25 Kg/m2 and no abnormalities in glucose metabolism (fasting plasma glucose < 100 mg/dL and no diabetes). The 90th percentile of the Homeostasis Model Assessment index distribution was used to obtain the ideal cut-off for insulin resistance. We also selected a validation cohort of 300 individuals (no exclusion criteria applied).Results: From 7 000 individuals, and after the exclusion criteria, there were left 1 784 individuals. The 90th percentile for Homeostasis Model Assessment index was 2.33. In the validation cohort, applying that cut-off, we have 49.3% of individuals with insulin resistance. However, only 69.9% of the metabolic syndrome patients had insulin resistance according to that cut-off. By ROC curve analysis, the ideal cut-off for metabolic syndrome is 2.41. Homeostasis Model Assessment index correlated with BMI (r = 0.371, p < 0.001) and is an independent predictor of the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR 19.4, 95% CI 6.6 – 57.2, p < 0.001).Discussion: Our study showed that in a Portuguese population of patients admitted electively in a Cardiology ward, 2.33 is the Homeostasis Model Assessment index cut-off for insulin resistance and 2.41 for metabolic syndrome.Conclusion: Homeostasis Model Assessment index is directly correlated with BMI and is an independent predictor of metabolic syndrome.Keywords: Glucose Tolerance Test; Homeostasis; Insulin Resistance Metabolic Syndrome. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5180 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5180 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/4026 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7096 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7310 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7311 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7312 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7335 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7336 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5180/7372 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf image/tiff image/tiff application/msword application/msword application/pdf application/pdf image/jpeg |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2014): July-August; 473-479 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 4 (2014): Julho-Agosto; 473-479 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817551153439703040 |