Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, Joao Pimentel
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Vítor, Morais, Nuno, Anacleto, Sara, Mota, Paulo, Lima, Estêvão
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.115
Resumo: Introduction: Although the risk of urethral trauma while treating bladder stones is worrisome, evidence about the best treatment approach is scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of transurethral cystolithotomy and percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy in adults´ bladder lithiasis treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 120 patients (January 2012 to December 2017) who were surgically treated for bladder lithiasis with percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy (n= 20) and transurethral cystolithotomy (n= 100). Age, gender, calculi size, surgery duration, hospital stay, post-operative infections, haematuria, pain and urethral strictures were evaluated. Previous diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia and urethral strictures were also considered. Results: Both groups were homogeneous according to the pre-operative variables evaluated, including calculi dimensions and simultaneous diagnosis. Median surgery time in percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotomy were 65 and 58 minutes, respectively (p= 0.043). Pain and haematuria were similar in both groups. Median hospital stay was 2.0 days in both groups. Median follow-up time was 13 months. In the transurethral cystolithotomy, three patients (3%) developed urethral stricture while none of the patients treated with PSC developed urethral strictures during the follow-up (p= 0.435). Discussion: Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy theoretically offers an advantage over transurethral cystolithotomy in terms of urethral trauma, although we did not observe a significant difference. However, it deserves to be considered, especially in patients with known urethral strictures that may hinder transurethral access. Further prospective studies with more patients may however confirm these theoretical advantages.
id RCAP_cea359360ded3028885b15e29da4df2c
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/115
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?Cistolitotomia Percutânea ou Transuretral: Qual é Mais Segura?Lithotripsy/methodsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder Calculi/surgeryUrinary Bladder Calculi/therapyCálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaCálculos da Bexiga Urinária/tratamentoLitotrícia/métodosResultado do TratamentoIntroduction: Although the risk of urethral trauma while treating bladder stones is worrisome, evidence about the best treatment approach is scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of transurethral cystolithotomy and percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy in adults´ bladder lithiasis treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 120 patients (January 2012 to December 2017) who were surgically treated for bladder lithiasis with percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy (n= 20) and transurethral cystolithotomy (n= 100). Age, gender, calculi size, surgery duration, hospital stay, post-operative infections, haematuria, pain and urethral strictures were evaluated. Previous diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia and urethral strictures were also considered. Results: Both groups were homogeneous according to the pre-operative variables evaluated, including calculi dimensions and simultaneous diagnosis. Median surgery time in percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotomy were 65 and 58 minutes, respectively (p= 0.043). Pain and haematuria were similar in both groups. Median hospital stay was 2.0 days in both groups. Median follow-up time was 13 months. In the transurethral cystolithotomy, three patients (3%) developed urethral stricture while none of the patients treated with PSC developed urethral strictures during the follow-up (p= 0.435). Discussion: Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy theoretically offers an advantage over transurethral cystolithotomy in terms of urethral trauma, although we did not observe a significant difference. However, it deserves to be considered, especially in patients with known urethral strictures that may hinder transurethral access. Further prospective studies with more patients may however confirm these theoretical advantages.Introdução: Apesar do risco de trauma uretral durante o tratamento de litíase vesical ser preocupante, há pouca evidência acerca do melhor método endourológico a usar. O objectivo deste estudo é comparar a segurança e eficácia da cistolitotomia transuretral e da cistolitotomia percutânea suprapúbica no tratamento de litíase vesical de adultos. Métodos: Cento e vinte doentes submetidos a tratamento de litíase vesical entre Janeiro de 2012 e Dezembro de 2017 foram retrospectivamente avaliados. Destes, 20 foram submetidos a cistolitotomia percutânea suprapúbica e 100 a cistolitotomia transuretral. Sexo, idade, volume litiásico, duração da cirurgia, duração da estadia hospitalar e complicações (infecção, hematúria, dor e estenose da uretra) foram avaliados, assim como diagnósticos prévios de hiperplasia benigna da próstata e estenoses uretrais. Resultados: Os grupos analisados não apresentavam diferenças significativas relativamente às variáveis pré-operatórias analisadas, incluindo volume litiásico e diagnósticos prévios. O tempo mediano de cirurgia na cistolitotomia percutânea suprapúbica e cistolitotomia transuretral foi de 68 e 58 minutos, respectivamente (p= 0,043) e o tempo médio de internamento foi de 2 dias em ambos os grupos. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 13 meses. No grupo cistolitotomia transuretral, três doentes (3%) desenvolveram estenose da uretra pós operatória enquanto nenhum dos doentes no grupo cistolitotomia percutânea suprapúbica teve esta complicação (p= 0,435). A dor e hematúria foram semelhantes em ambos os grupos. Discussão: A cistolitotomia percutânea suprapúbica oferece em teoria uma vantagem sobre a cistolitotomia transuretral em termos de risco de trauma uretral, embora neste estudo não tenha sido confirmada esta vantagem. De qualquer forma, merece ser considerada, principalmente em doentes com história de estenose da uretra que possa dificultar o procedimento transuretral. Estudos futuros prospectivos e com mais doentes são necessários para confirmar esta vantagem.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2019-09-21T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.115oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/115Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1-2 (2019): January - June; 17-22Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 36 n. 1-2 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 17-222387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/115https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.115http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/115/50Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, Joao PimentelFernandes, VítorMorais, NunoAnacleto, SaraMota, PauloLima, Estêvão2022-09-21T09:04:48Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/115Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:54.829358Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
Cistolitotomia Percutânea ou Transuretral: Qual é Mais Segura?
title Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
spellingShingle Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
Torres, Joao Pimentel
Lithotripsy/methods
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Calculi/surgery
Urinary Bladder Calculi/therapy
Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento
Litotrícia/métodos
Resultado do Tratamento
title_short Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
title_full Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
title_fullStr Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
title_sort Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?
author Torres, Joao Pimentel
author_facet Torres, Joao Pimentel
Fernandes, Vítor
Morais, Nuno
Anacleto, Sara
Mota, Paulo
Lima, Estêvão
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Vítor
Morais, Nuno
Anacleto, Sara
Mota, Paulo
Lima, Estêvão
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, Joao Pimentel
Fernandes, Vítor
Morais, Nuno
Anacleto, Sara
Mota, Paulo
Lima, Estêvão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lithotripsy/methods
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Calculi/surgery
Urinary Bladder Calculi/therapy
Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento
Litotrícia/métodos
Resultado do Tratamento
topic Lithotripsy/methods
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Calculi/surgery
Urinary Bladder Calculi/therapy
Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento
Litotrícia/métodos
Resultado do Tratamento
description Introduction: Although the risk of urethral trauma while treating bladder stones is worrisome, evidence about the best treatment approach is scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of transurethral cystolithotomy and percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy in adults´ bladder lithiasis treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 120 patients (January 2012 to December 2017) who were surgically treated for bladder lithiasis with percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy (n= 20) and transurethral cystolithotomy (n= 100). Age, gender, calculi size, surgery duration, hospital stay, post-operative infections, haematuria, pain and urethral strictures were evaluated. Previous diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia and urethral strictures were also considered. Results: Both groups were homogeneous according to the pre-operative variables evaluated, including calculi dimensions and simultaneous diagnosis. Median surgery time in percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotomy were 65 and 58 minutes, respectively (p= 0.043). Pain and haematuria were similar in both groups. Median hospital stay was 2.0 days in both groups. Median follow-up time was 13 months. In the transurethral cystolithotomy, three patients (3%) developed urethral stricture while none of the patients treated with PSC developed urethral strictures during the follow-up (p= 0.435). Discussion: Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy theoretically offers an advantage over transurethral cystolithotomy in terms of urethral trauma, although we did not observe a significant difference. However, it deserves to be considered, especially in patients with known urethral strictures that may hinder transurethral access. Further prospective studies with more patients may however confirm these theoretical advantages.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-21T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.115
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/115
url https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.115
identifier_str_mv oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/115
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.115
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/115/50
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urology
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urology
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1-2 (2019): January - June; 17-22
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 36 n. 1-2 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 17-22
2387-0419
2341-4022
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130427744583680