Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sosa, Filipe H. B.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Coutinho. João A. P., Lopes, André M. da Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35445
Resumo: The extensive use of toxic and persistent solvents in chemical processes and products, and the awareness of their negative impact on environment and public health, have led to a growing interest from both research community and chemical industry on the topic of sustainable solvents. In this sense, two classes of “green” solvents, Ionic Liquids (IL) and Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES), have been studied as eco-friendly alternatives to increase the sustainability of chemical processes and products. The research on ILs and their applications can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century but only accelerated in the last 20 years, while the concept of DES is quite recent as it was proposed for the first time in the beginning of this century. Equivocally, DES are often considered in literature as subclass of ILs. Despite the similarities between these solvents, mainly related to their applications and some physical properties, from a physicochemical point of view they are two distinct groups of solvents. Moreover, the countless number of combinations of precursors that can form IL and DES makes their characterization and benchmark usually difficult. Therefore, this chapter intends to clarify the definition and classification of these green solvents and stresses out the main differences, similarities, advantages and disadvantages between them. A series of comparisons between their physicochemical properties and other topics such as toxicity, biodegradability and recycling are herein tackled. In addition, the application of these solvents in the valorization of lignocellulosic biomass was briefly discussed as a case study with high potential for industrial implementation.
id RCAP_cea5f9d19a96a6070817ab932c27faf4
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/35445
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differencesGreen solventsPhysicochemical propertiesToxicityBiodegradabilityBiomass fractionationSolvent recyclingThe extensive use of toxic and persistent solvents in chemical processes and products, and the awareness of their negative impact on environment and public health, have led to a growing interest from both research community and chemical industry on the topic of sustainable solvents. In this sense, two classes of “green” solvents, Ionic Liquids (IL) and Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES), have been studied as eco-friendly alternatives to increase the sustainability of chemical processes and products. The research on ILs and their applications can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century but only accelerated in the last 20 years, while the concept of DES is quite recent as it was proposed for the first time in the beginning of this century. Equivocally, DES are often considered in literature as subclass of ILs. Despite the similarities between these solvents, mainly related to their applications and some physical properties, from a physicochemical point of view they are two distinct groups of solvents. Moreover, the countless number of combinations of precursors that can form IL and DES makes their characterization and benchmark usually difficult. Therefore, this chapter intends to clarify the definition and classification of these green solvents and stresses out the main differences, similarities, advantages and disadvantages between them. A series of comparisons between their physicochemical properties and other topics such as toxicity, biodegradability and recycling are herein tackled. In addition, the application of these solvents in the valorization of lignocellulosic biomass was briefly discussed as a case study with high potential for industrial implementation.Elsevier2024-07-01T00:00:00Z2022-07-01T00:00:00Z2022-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/35445eng978-0-323-99905-210.1016/C2021-0-00496-XSosa, Filipe H. B.Coutinho. João A. P.Lopes, André M. da Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:07:59Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/35445Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:06:21.566979Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
title Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
spellingShingle Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
Sosa, Filipe H. B.
Green solvents
Physicochemical properties
Toxicity
Biodegradability
Biomass fractionation
Solvent recycling
title_short Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
title_full Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
title_fullStr Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
title_full_unstemmed Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
title_sort Deep eutectic solvents vs. ionic liquids: similarities and differences
author Sosa, Filipe H. B.
author_facet Sosa, Filipe H. B.
Coutinho. João A. P.
Lopes, André M. da Costa
author_role author
author2 Coutinho. João A. P.
Lopes, André M. da Costa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sosa, Filipe H. B.
Coutinho. João A. P.
Lopes, André M. da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Green solvents
Physicochemical properties
Toxicity
Biodegradability
Biomass fractionation
Solvent recycling
topic Green solvents
Physicochemical properties
Toxicity
Biodegradability
Biomass fractionation
Solvent recycling
description The extensive use of toxic and persistent solvents in chemical processes and products, and the awareness of their negative impact on environment and public health, have led to a growing interest from both research community and chemical industry on the topic of sustainable solvents. In this sense, two classes of “green” solvents, Ionic Liquids (IL) and Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES), have been studied as eco-friendly alternatives to increase the sustainability of chemical processes and products. The research on ILs and their applications can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century but only accelerated in the last 20 years, while the concept of DES is quite recent as it was proposed for the first time in the beginning of this century. Equivocally, DES are often considered in literature as subclass of ILs. Despite the similarities between these solvents, mainly related to their applications and some physical properties, from a physicochemical point of view they are two distinct groups of solvents. Moreover, the countless number of combinations of precursors that can form IL and DES makes their characterization and benchmark usually difficult. Therefore, this chapter intends to clarify the definition and classification of these green solvents and stresses out the main differences, similarities, advantages and disadvantages between them. A series of comparisons between their physicochemical properties and other topics such as toxicity, biodegradability and recycling are herein tackled. In addition, the application of these solvents in the valorization of lignocellulosic biomass was briefly discussed as a case study with high potential for industrial implementation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z
2022-07
2024-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35445
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/35445
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 978-0-323-99905-2
10.1016/C2021-0-00496-X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137718893019136