Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcelino, Gisela
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Nuno, Oliveira, Gabriel, Marialva, Celso, Campanha, Rafaela, Albergaria, Diogo, Santos, Carlos, Lebre, Rui, Corte-Real, João
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
Resumo: Background: Patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) and Hinchey<III may also need surgery. Therefore, as other markers are needed to help deciding which patients should be operated on, we tried to test the value of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and of blood cell count (and their ratios). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our surgical department between 2009 and 2011 with the diagnosis of AD. Only cases with a computed tomography confirmation were included in the study.Results: 174 patients (147 men, 27 women, age range 24-93 years) presented with AD. 161 patients had a modified Hinchey classification <III and 17 patients were submitted to surgery (7 had Hinchey III or IV and 10 had Hinchey<III). The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) had the best discriminant value in deciding for a surgical procedure in the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve. NER discriminated non-surgical and surgical treatment with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.92). The cut-off>244.25 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 44-98%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 79-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.85 (95% CI, 3.40-10.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.80). In fact, NER>244.25 successfully predicted 15 out of 17 cases that were operated on in our sample. Conclusions: NER is a good marker in discriminating those that should be operated on regardless of the Hinchey category. However, more studies are needed to confirm these data.
id RCAP_cec5c71a0c209096ffc6b5174c0c25bc
oai_identifier_str oai:revista.spcir.com:article/393
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitisBackground: Patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) and Hinchey<III may also need surgery. Therefore, as other markers are needed to help deciding which patients should be operated on, we tried to test the value of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and of blood cell count (and their ratios). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our surgical department between 2009 and 2011 with the diagnosis of AD. Only cases with a computed tomography confirmation were included in the study.Results: 174 patients (147 men, 27 women, age range 24-93 years) presented with AD. 161 patients had a modified Hinchey classification <III and 17 patients were submitted to surgery (7 had Hinchey III or IV and 10 had Hinchey<III). The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) had the best discriminant value in deciding for a surgical procedure in the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve. NER discriminated non-surgical and surgical treatment with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.92). The cut-off>244.25 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 44-98%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 79-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.85 (95% CI, 3.40-10.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.80). In fact, NER>244.25 successfully predicted 15 out of 17 cases that were operated on in our sample. Conclusions: NER is a good marker in discriminating those that should be operated on regardless of the Hinchey category. However, more studies are needed to confirm these data.Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2015-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 33 (2015): Number 33 - June 2015; 11-19Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 33 (2015): Number 33 - June 2015; 11-192183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393/390Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarcelino, GiselaCarvalho, NunoOliveira, GabrielMarialva, CelsoCampanha, RafaelaAlbergaria, DiogoSantos, CarlosLebre, RuiCorte-Real, João2024-03-14T22:05:05Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/393Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T04:00:48.932768Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
spellingShingle Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
Marcelino, Gisela
title_short Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_full Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_fullStr Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_full_unstemmed Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
title_sort Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and c-reactive protein are predictors of surgery in acute diverticulitis
author Marcelino, Gisela
author_facet Marcelino, Gisela
Carvalho, Nuno
Oliveira, Gabriel
Marialva, Celso
Campanha, Rafaela
Albergaria, Diogo
Santos, Carlos
Lebre, Rui
Corte-Real, João
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Nuno
Oliveira, Gabriel
Marialva, Celso
Campanha, Rafaela
Albergaria, Diogo
Santos, Carlos
Lebre, Rui
Corte-Real, João
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcelino, Gisela
Carvalho, Nuno
Oliveira, Gabriel
Marialva, Celso
Campanha, Rafaela
Albergaria, Diogo
Santos, Carlos
Lebre, Rui
Corte-Real, João
description Background: Patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) and Hinchey<III may also need surgery. Therefore, as other markers are needed to help deciding which patients should be operated on, we tried to test the value of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and of blood cell count (and their ratios). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our surgical department between 2009 and 2011 with the diagnosis of AD. Only cases with a computed tomography confirmation were included in the study.Results: 174 patients (147 men, 27 women, age range 24-93 years) presented with AD. 161 patients had a modified Hinchey classification <III and 17 patients were submitted to surgery (7 had Hinchey III or IV and 10 had Hinchey<III). The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) had the best discriminant value in deciding for a surgical procedure in the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve. NER discriminated non-surgical and surgical treatment with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.92). The cut-off>244.25 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 44-98%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 79-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.85 (95% CI, 3.40-10.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.80). In fact, NER>244.25 successfully predicted 15 out of 17 cases that were operated on in our sample. Conclusions: NER is a good marker in discriminating those that should be operated on regardless of the Hinchey category. However, more studies are needed to confirm these data.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
url https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/393/390
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 33 (2015): Number 33 - June 2015; 11-19
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 33 (2015): Number 33 - June 2015; 11-19
2183-1165
1646-6918
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138182789332992