Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paula, Vanessa B.
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Estevinho, Leticia M., Cardoso, Susana M., Dias, L.G.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26721
Summary: Propolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. The total phenolic compounds in the samples were determined by six different techniques: four different Folin-Ciocalteu (F-C) methods, spectrophotometry (SPECT), and voltammetry (SWV). Of the six methods, SPECT allowed the highest quantification, while SWV achieved the lowest. The mean TPC values for these methods were 422 & PLUSMN; 98 and 47 & PLUSMN; 11 mg GAE/g sample, respectively. Antioxidant capacity was determined by four different methods: DPPH, FRAP, original ferrocyanide (OFec), and modified ferrocyanide (MFec). The MFec method gave the highest antioxidant capacity for all samples, followed by the DPPH method. The study also investigated the correlation between TPC and antioxidant capacity with the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA), and flavonoids (FLAV) in propolis samples. The results showed that the concentrations of specific compounds in propolis samples can significantly impact their antioxidant capacity and TPC quantification. Analysis of the profile of phenolic compounds by the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS technique identified chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester as the major compounds in the four propolis samples. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of the choice of method for determining TPC and antioxidant activity in samples and the contribution of HBA and HCA content to their quantification.
id RCAP_ced1aa39f5cd0000800dc114b2b544a8
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/26721
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differencesPropolisTotal phenolic compoundsAntioxidant capacityUHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSPropolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. The total phenolic compounds in the samples were determined by six different techniques: four different Folin-Ciocalteu (F-C) methods, spectrophotometry (SPECT), and voltammetry (SWV). Of the six methods, SPECT allowed the highest quantification, while SWV achieved the lowest. The mean TPC values for these methods were 422 & PLUSMN; 98 and 47 & PLUSMN; 11 mg GAE/g sample, respectively. Antioxidant capacity was determined by four different methods: DPPH, FRAP, original ferrocyanide (OFec), and modified ferrocyanide (MFec). The MFec method gave the highest antioxidant capacity for all samples, followed by the DPPH method. The study also investigated the correlation between TPC and antioxidant capacity with the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA), and flavonoids (FLAV) in propolis samples. The results showed that the concentrations of specific compounds in propolis samples can significantly impact their antioxidant capacity and TPC quantification. Analysis of the profile of phenolic compounds by the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS technique identified chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester as the major compounds in the four propolis samples. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of the choice of method for determining TPC and antioxidant activity in samples and the contribution of HBA and HCA content to their quantification.The authors are grateful to: Nelson De Moura of the company Ecoapis Unipessoal Lda (http://www.ecoapis.pt (accessed on 15 March 2023)) for supplying the propolis samples; Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020 and UIDP/00690/2020) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2020).MDPIBiblioteca Digital do IPBPaula, Vanessa B.Estevinho, Leticia M.Cardoso, Susana M.Dias, L.G.2023-02-01T11:10:50Z20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/26721engPaula, Vanessa B.; Estevinho, Leticia M.; Cardoso, Susana M.; Dias, L.G. (2023). Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences. Molecules. eISSN 1420-3049. 28:12, p. 1-2310.3390/molecules281248471420-3049info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T01:17:50Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/26721Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:17:07.744346Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
title Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
spellingShingle Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
Paula, Vanessa B.
Propolis
Total phenolic compounds
Antioxidant capacity
UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS
title_short Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
title_full Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
title_fullStr Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
title_full_unstemmed Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
title_sort Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences
author Paula, Vanessa B.
author_facet Paula, Vanessa B.
Estevinho, Leticia M.
Cardoso, Susana M.
Dias, L.G.
author_role author
author2 Estevinho, Leticia M.
Cardoso, Susana M.
Dias, L.G.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paula, Vanessa B.
Estevinho, Leticia M.
Cardoso, Susana M.
Dias, L.G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Propolis
Total phenolic compounds
Antioxidant capacity
UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS
topic Propolis
Total phenolic compounds
Antioxidant capacity
UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS
description Propolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. The total phenolic compounds in the samples were determined by six different techniques: four different Folin-Ciocalteu (F-C) methods, spectrophotometry (SPECT), and voltammetry (SWV). Of the six methods, SPECT allowed the highest quantification, while SWV achieved the lowest. The mean TPC values for these methods were 422 & PLUSMN; 98 and 47 & PLUSMN; 11 mg GAE/g sample, respectively. Antioxidant capacity was determined by four different methods: DPPH, FRAP, original ferrocyanide (OFec), and modified ferrocyanide (MFec). The MFec method gave the highest antioxidant capacity for all samples, followed by the DPPH method. The study also investigated the correlation between TPC and antioxidant capacity with the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA), and flavonoids (FLAV) in propolis samples. The results showed that the concentrations of specific compounds in propolis samples can significantly impact their antioxidant capacity and TPC quantification. Analysis of the profile of phenolic compounds by the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS technique identified chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester as the major compounds in the four propolis samples. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of the choice of method for determining TPC and antioxidant activity in samples and the contribution of HBA and HCA content to their quantification.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-01T11:10:50Z
2023
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26721
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26721
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Paula, Vanessa B.; Estevinho, Leticia M.; Cardoso, Susana M.; Dias, L.G. (2023). Comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences. Molecules. eISSN 1420-3049. 28:12, p. 1-23
10.3390/molecules28124847
1420-3049
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135459463397376