Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Anholt, Rosanne
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090
Resumo: Little is known about how the idea of ‘resilience’ translates into practice. It has nonetheless emerged as a dominant theme in the governance of crises, such as political instability, armed conflict, terrorism, and large-scale refugee movements. This study draws on interviews with humanitarian and development practitioners in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon working under the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan to explore how resilience is interpreted and translated on the ground. Results suggest that resilience is translated as the economic self-reliance of refugees, and the capacity for crisis management of refugee-hosting states, enacted through ‘localization’ and strengthening the ‘humanitarian-development nexus.’ The prominence of the political and economic context and the power relations between crisis response actors that it generates reveals the limits of what a buzzword like resilience can achieve on the ground. The findings highlight the need for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to engage in continuous critical reflection on whether the ways in which resilience policies and programmes are implemented actually improve the ability of systems and vulnerable populations to recover from crisis, as well as on the validity of the assumptions and interpretations on which such policies and programmes are built.
id RCAP_cf6b190cd86b292bac9552743788c7b4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3090
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanoncrisis governance; development; humanitarianism; resilienceLittle is known about how the idea of ‘resilience’ translates into practice. It has nonetheless emerged as a dominant theme in the governance of crises, such as political instability, armed conflict, terrorism, and large-scale refugee movements. This study draws on interviews with humanitarian and development practitioners in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon working under the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan to explore how resilience is interpreted and translated on the ground. Results suggest that resilience is translated as the economic self-reliance of refugees, and the capacity for crisis management of refugee-hosting states, enacted through ‘localization’ and strengthening the ‘humanitarian-development nexus.’ The prominence of the political and economic context and the power relations between crisis response actors that it generates reveals the limits of what a buzzword like resilience can achieve on the ground. The findings highlight the need for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to engage in continuous critical reflection on whether the ways in which resilience policies and programmes are implemented actually improve the ability of systems and vulnerable populations to recover from crisis, as well as on the validity of the assumptions and interpretations on which such policies and programmes are built.Cogitatio2020-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3090Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Politics of Disaster Governance; 294-3052183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3090https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3090/3090Copyright (c) 2020 Rosanne Anholthttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAnholt, Rosanne2022-12-22T15:16:46Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3090Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:27.318627Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
title Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
spellingShingle Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
Anholt, Rosanne
crisis governance; development; humanitarianism; resilience
title_short Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
title_full Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
title_fullStr Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
title_full_unstemmed Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
title_sort Resilience in Practice: Responding to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon
author Anholt, Rosanne
author_facet Anholt, Rosanne
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Anholt, Rosanne
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv crisis governance; development; humanitarianism; resilience
topic crisis governance; development; humanitarianism; resilience
description Little is known about how the idea of ‘resilience’ translates into practice. It has nonetheless emerged as a dominant theme in the governance of crises, such as political instability, armed conflict, terrorism, and large-scale refugee movements. This study draws on interviews with humanitarian and development practitioners in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon working under the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan to explore how resilience is interpreted and translated on the ground. Results suggest that resilience is translated as the economic self-reliance of refugees, and the capacity for crisis management of refugee-hosting states, enacted through ‘localization’ and strengthening the ‘humanitarian-development nexus.’ The prominence of the political and economic context and the power relations between crisis response actors that it generates reveals the limits of what a buzzword like resilience can achieve on the ground. The findings highlight the need for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to engage in continuous critical reflection on whether the ways in which resilience policies and programmes are implemented actually improve the ability of systems and vulnerable populations to recover from crisis, as well as on the validity of the assumptions and interpretations on which such policies and programmes are built.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3090
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3090
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3090
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3090
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3090/3090
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rosanne Anholt
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rosanne Anholt
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Politics of Disaster Governance; 294-305
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130670305378304