How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Mario Gabriel Santiago Dos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Sara, Bastos, Rita, Carvalho, Diogo, Cabral, João Alexandre Ferreira Abel Dos ...
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10348/9064
Resumo: Worldwide landscape changes and the uncertainty about its impacts on species abundances, distributions and on ecosystems structure and functioning, have been increasing the value of modelling tools in a very obvious way. Thirteen years ago, the first holistic stochastic dynamic methodology (StDM) application was published (Ecological Indicators 3(4), 285–303 by Santos and Cabral (2004)) intended for predicting ecological indicators trends in face of realistic scenarios of land use/land cover changes. The application of this StDM framework provided some basis to simulate landscape changes and predict the subsequent response of pertinent ecological indicators. Nevertheless, the results reliability could only be evaluated with subsequent independent information checking. In this work, based on independent data obtained thirteen years after, we compare the simulated land use changes and predicted responses of the selected ecological indicators with the respective real trends. The comparisons made confirmed that the implemented scenario was realistic and the ecological indicators’ response mostly accurate. This allowed for demonstrating the proposed frameworks potential and its use in landscape planning and managing of agro-environmental measures. Our approach also provides a promising and intuitive baseline to support risk assessments for land use changes, derived from ecological models linked with ecological monitoring, crucial to guide decision makers and environmental managers.
id RCAP_cf754cb1f0b22f711dcf2a0f813414db
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/9064
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapesPasserinesLandscapeStochastic dynamic methodologyEcological indicatorsEcological models’ evaluationWorldwide landscape changes and the uncertainty about its impacts on species abundances, distributions and on ecosystems structure and functioning, have been increasing the value of modelling tools in a very obvious way. Thirteen years ago, the first holistic stochastic dynamic methodology (StDM) application was published (Ecological Indicators 3(4), 285–303 by Santos and Cabral (2004)) intended for predicting ecological indicators trends in face of realistic scenarios of land use/land cover changes. The application of this StDM framework provided some basis to simulate landscape changes and predict the subsequent response of pertinent ecological indicators. Nevertheless, the results reliability could only be evaluated with subsequent independent information checking. In this work, based on independent data obtained thirteen years after, we compare the simulated land use changes and predicted responses of the selected ecological indicators with the respective real trends. The comparisons made confirmed that the implemented scenario was realistic and the ecological indicators’ response mostly accurate. This allowed for demonstrating the proposed frameworks potential and its use in landscape planning and managing of agro-environmental measures. Our approach also provides a promising and intuitive baseline to support risk assessments for land use changes, derived from ecological models linked with ecological monitoring, crucial to guide decision makers and environmental managers.2019-01-29T15:23:54Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z20182019-01-28T13:37:24Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10348/9064eng1470-160Xhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03Santos, Mario Gabriel Santiago DosSilva, SaraBastos, RitaCarvalho, DiogoCabral, João Alexandre Ferreira Abel Dos ...info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-02T12:48:01Zoai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/9064Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:04:32.513898Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
title How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
spellingShingle How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
Santos, Mario Gabriel Santiago Dos
Passerines
Landscape
Stochastic dynamic methodology
Ecological indicators
Ecological models’ evaluation
title_short How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
title_full How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
title_fullStr How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
title_full_unstemmed How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
title_sort How good are the ecological assumptions and predictions made in the past? Insights from a dynamic modelling approach applied to changing landscapes
author Santos, Mario Gabriel Santiago Dos
author_facet Santos, Mario Gabriel Santiago Dos
Silva, Sara
Bastos, Rita
Carvalho, Diogo
Cabral, João Alexandre Ferreira Abel Dos ...
author_role author
author2 Silva, Sara
Bastos, Rita
Carvalho, Diogo
Cabral, João Alexandre Ferreira Abel Dos ...
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Mario Gabriel Santiago Dos
Silva, Sara
Bastos, Rita
Carvalho, Diogo
Cabral, João Alexandre Ferreira Abel Dos ...
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Passerines
Landscape
Stochastic dynamic methodology
Ecological indicators
Ecological models’ evaluation
topic Passerines
Landscape
Stochastic dynamic methodology
Ecological indicators
Ecological models’ evaluation
description Worldwide landscape changes and the uncertainty about its impacts on species abundances, distributions and on ecosystems structure and functioning, have been increasing the value of modelling tools in a very obvious way. Thirteen years ago, the first holistic stochastic dynamic methodology (StDM) application was published (Ecological Indicators 3(4), 285–303 by Santos and Cabral (2004)) intended for predicting ecological indicators trends in face of realistic scenarios of land use/land cover changes. The application of this StDM framework provided some basis to simulate landscape changes and predict the subsequent response of pertinent ecological indicators. Nevertheless, the results reliability could only be evaluated with subsequent independent information checking. In this work, based on independent data obtained thirteen years after, we compare the simulated land use changes and predicted responses of the selected ecological indicators with the respective real trends. The comparisons made confirmed that the implemented scenario was realistic and the ecological indicators’ response mostly accurate. This allowed for demonstrating the proposed frameworks potential and its use in landscape planning and managing of agro-environmental measures. Our approach also provides a promising and intuitive baseline to support risk assessments for land use changes, derived from ecological models linked with ecological monitoring, crucial to guide decision makers and environmental managers.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018
2019-01-29T15:23:54Z
2019-01-28T13:37:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10348/9064
url http://hdl.handle.net/10348/9064
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1470-160X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137131638030336