Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte, Susana Tinoco
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nunes, Carla, Costa, Daniela, Donato, Helena, Cruz, Eduardo B.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848
Resumo: Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. Methods and analysis This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. Ethics and dissemination As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders.
id RCAP_d068e1b157a546a4ceb63e1a48add047
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103206
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocolBack painMusculoskeletal disordersPain managementPrimary CareProtocols & guidelinesSpineDelivery of Health CareHumansPeer ReviewPrimary Health CareResearch DesignReview Literature as TopicLow Back PainIntroduction Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. Methods and analysis This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. Ethics and dissemination As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders.2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848eng2044-60552044-6055Duarte, Susana TinocoNunes, CarlaCosta, DanielaDonato, HelenaCruz, Eduardo B.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-10-21T20:31:42Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103206Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:04.886743Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
title Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
spellingShingle Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
Duarte, Susana Tinoco
Back pain
Musculoskeletal disorders
Pain management
Primary Care
Protocols & guidelines
Spine
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Peer Review
Primary Health Care
Research Design
Review Literature as Topic
Low Back Pain
title_short Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
title_full Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
title_sort Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
author Duarte, Susana Tinoco
author_facet Duarte, Susana Tinoco
Nunes, Carla
Costa, Daniela
Donato, Helena
Cruz, Eduardo B.
author_role author
author2 Nunes, Carla
Costa, Daniela
Donato, Helena
Cruz, Eduardo B.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, Susana Tinoco
Nunes, Carla
Costa, Daniela
Donato, Helena
Cruz, Eduardo B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Back pain
Musculoskeletal disorders
Pain management
Primary Care
Protocols & guidelines
Spine
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Peer Review
Primary Health Care
Research Design
Review Literature as Topic
Low Back Pain
topic Back pain
Musculoskeletal disorders
Pain management
Primary Care
Protocols & guidelines
Spine
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Peer Review
Primary Health Care
Research Design
Review Literature as Topic
Low Back Pain
description Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. Methods and analysis This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. Ethics and dissemination As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2044-6055
2044-6055
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134094472249344