Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848 |
Resumo: | Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. Methods and analysis This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. Ethics and dissemination As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders. |
id |
RCAP_d068e1b157a546a4ceb63e1a48add047 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103206 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocolBack painMusculoskeletal disordersPain managementPrimary CareProtocols & guidelinesSpineDelivery of Health CareHumansPeer ReviewPrimary Health CareResearch DesignReview Literature as TopicLow Back PainIntroduction Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. Methods and analysis This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. Ethics and dissemination As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders.2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848eng2044-60552044-6055Duarte, Susana TinocoNunes, CarlaCosta, DanielaDonato, HelenaCruz, Eduardo B.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-10-21T20:31:42Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103206Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:04.886743Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
title |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
spellingShingle |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol Duarte, Susana Tinoco Back pain Musculoskeletal disorders Pain management Primary Care Protocols & guidelines Spine Delivery of Health Care Humans Peer Review Primary Health Care Research Design Review Literature as Topic Low Back Pain |
title_short |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
title_full |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort |
Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol |
author |
Duarte, Susana Tinoco |
author_facet |
Duarte, Susana Tinoco Nunes, Carla Costa, Daniela Donato, Helena Cruz, Eduardo B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes, Carla Costa, Daniela Donato, Helena Cruz, Eduardo B. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte, Susana Tinoco Nunes, Carla Costa, Daniela Donato, Helena Cruz, Eduardo B. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Back pain Musculoskeletal disorders Pain management Primary Care Protocols & guidelines Spine Delivery of Health Care Humans Peer Review Primary Health Care Research Design Review Literature as Topic Low Back Pain |
topic |
Back pain Musculoskeletal disorders Pain management Primary Care Protocols & guidelines Spine Delivery of Health Care Humans Peer Review Primary Health Care Research Design Review Literature as Topic Low Back Pain |
description |
Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. Methods and analysis This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. Ethics and dissemination As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103206 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2044-6055 2044-6055 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134094472249344 |