The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i3.406 |
Resumo: | Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) is a sampling method commonly used in recent years. This sampling method is especially useful for studies in medicine, agriculture, forestry and ecology. In this study, the widely used ranking error models in RSS literature are investigated. This study is aimed to explore the effects of ranking error models on the mean estimators based on RSS and some of its modified methods such as Extreme RSS (ERSS) and Percentile RSS (PRSS) for different distribution, set and cycle size in infinite population. Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted for this purpose. Additionally, the study is supported by real life data. It is observed that, RSS and some of its modified methods shows better results than Simple Random Sampling (SRS). |
id |
RCAP_d0c8aea8b7edc01feb3aa7a4350673bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revstat:article/406 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Samplingranked set samplingranking error modelsrelative efficiencymean estimatorabalone datasetRanked Set Sampling (RSS) is a sampling method commonly used in recent years. This sampling method is especially useful for studies in medicine, agriculture, forestry and ecology. In this study, the widely used ranking error models in RSS literature are investigated. This study is aimed to explore the effects of ranking error models on the mean estimators based on RSS and some of its modified methods such as Extreme RSS (ERSS) and Percentile RSS (PRSS) for different distribution, set and cycle size in infinite population. Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted for this purpose. Additionally, the study is supported by real life data. It is observed that, RSS and some of its modified methods shows better results than Simple Random Sampling (SRS).Statistics Portugal2023-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i3.406https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i3.406REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 347–366REVSTAT; Vol. 21 N.º 3 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 347–3662183-03711645-6726reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/406https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/406/650Copyright (c) 2021 REVSTAT-Statistical Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAkdeniz , SamiOzkal Yildiz , Tugba2023-08-12T06:30:24Zoai:revstat:article/406Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:26:50.295660Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
title |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
spellingShingle |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling Akdeniz , Sami ranked set sampling ranking error models relative efficiency mean estimator abalone dataset |
title_short |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
title_full |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
title_fullStr |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
title_sort |
The Effects of Ranking Error Models on Mean Estimators Based on Ranked Set Sampling |
author |
Akdeniz , Sami |
author_facet |
Akdeniz , Sami Ozkal Yildiz , Tugba |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ozkal Yildiz , Tugba |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Akdeniz , Sami Ozkal Yildiz , Tugba |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ranked set sampling ranking error models relative efficiency mean estimator abalone dataset |
topic |
ranked set sampling ranking error models relative efficiency mean estimator abalone dataset |
description |
Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) is a sampling method commonly used in recent years. This sampling method is especially useful for studies in medicine, agriculture, forestry and ecology. In this study, the widely used ranking error models in RSS literature are investigated. This study is aimed to explore the effects of ranking error models on the mean estimators based on RSS and some of its modified methods such as Extreme RSS (ERSS) and Percentile RSS (PRSS) for different distribution, set and cycle size in infinite population. Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted for this purpose. Additionally, the study is supported by real life data. It is observed that, RSS and some of its modified methods shows better results than Simple Random Sampling (SRS). |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i3.406 https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i3.406 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i3.406 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/406 https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/406/650 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 REVSTAT-Statistical Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 REVSTAT-Statistical Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Statistics Portugal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Statistics Portugal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 347–366 REVSTAT; Vol. 21 N.º 3 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 347–366 2183-0371 1645-6726 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133536420102144 |