Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16935 |
Resumo: | This paper presents a case study with two traditional Mediterranean-type farming systems: cropping dominant and grazing or livestock dominant. Traditional farming systems from the Mediterranean area in the Alentejo, southern region of Portugal, are compared in terms of economic returns, environmental impacts and trade-offs. A linear programming model that considers the economic and environmental issues for each farming system was developed. The models maximize farm profit subject to managerial, resource and environmental constraints. Environmental impacts were evaluated from cradle-to-grave and assessed following an input-output (I/O) analysis of environmental accounts and a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Results are used for economic evaluation and environmental impacts of farming systems. Results show that livestock predominant farming has larger environmental impact and lower net farm income than the crop farming system. Shadow prices of environmental constraints are compared for both systems to evaluate cost and efficiency of policies that constrains environmental consequences and promote sustainability. Costs required to compensate farmers for reductions of environmental impacts are lower for livestock predominant farming than for crop farms. Therefore, policy priorities should be targeted firstly to livestock predominant farming system effects. Subsidies represent a substantial part of the net farm income in both cases. Hence, in both cases, but particularly with the livestock predominant farming, there is considerable margin to improve policy effectiveness to control environmental impacts. |
id |
RCAP_d0d268d68f8b0f307e2fb6355c2a309d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/16935 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequencesSustentabilidade dos sistemas dominantes de produção agrícola e pecuária em sequeiro na região Alentejo: diferenças nos resultados económicos e efeitos ambientaisGeralThis paper presents a case study with two traditional Mediterranean-type farming systems: cropping dominant and grazing or livestock dominant. Traditional farming systems from the Mediterranean area in the Alentejo, southern region of Portugal, are compared in terms of economic returns, environmental impacts and trade-offs. A linear programming model that considers the economic and environmental issues for each farming system was developed. The models maximize farm profit subject to managerial, resource and environmental constraints. Environmental impacts were evaluated from cradle-to-grave and assessed following an input-output (I/O) analysis of environmental accounts and a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Results are used for economic evaluation and environmental impacts of farming systems. Results show that livestock predominant farming has larger environmental impact and lower net farm income than the crop farming system. Shadow prices of environmental constraints are compared for both systems to evaluate cost and efficiency of policies that constrains environmental consequences and promote sustainability. Costs required to compensate farmers for reductions of environmental impacts are lower for livestock predominant farming than for crop farms. Therefore, policy priorities should be targeted firstly to livestock predominant farming system effects. Subsidies represent a substantial part of the net farm income in both cases. Hence, in both cases, but particularly with the livestock predominant farming, there is considerable margin to improve policy effectiveness to control environmental impacts.Este artigo apresenta um estudo de caso com dois sistemas agrícolas tradicionais característicos da área Mediterrânea, no Alentejo, região sul de Portugal. Um sistema agrícola tradicional dominante na produção de culturas e, um segundo sistema agrícola tradicional vocacionado para a produção de pastagens e forragens dominante em produção animal. Para cada sistema de produção foi desenvolvido um modelo de programação linear que considera os aspetos económicos e ambientais. Os modelos maximizam o lucro da exploração sujeito a restrições de recursos, de implementação das rotações e restrições ambientais. Estes sistemas tradicionais da área Mediterrânea, foram comparados em termos de resultados económicos, impactes ambientais e “trade-offs”. Os impactes ambientais foram avaliados do “berço ao túmulo” seguindo uma análise de input-output (I/O) do azoto e da energia utilizada e uma metodologia do ciclo de vida (ACV) para os gases de efeito de estufa, acidificação, eutrofização e um indicador agregado de impacte ecológico. Os resultados mostram que o sistema predominante em pecuária tem impacte ambiental maior e rendimento líquido mais baixo do que o sistema predominante em culturas. Os preços sombra das restrições ambientais foram comparados em ambos os sistemas para avaliar os potenciais custos e eficiências de políticas ambientais que promovem a sua sustentabilidade. Os custos requeridos para compensar os agricultores por reduções de impacte ambiental são mais baixos para o sistema predominante em animais que para o de culturas. Por isso as prioridades políticas deverão ser dirigidas mais para o sistema predominante de animais do que para o de culturas. Os subsídios representam uma parte substancial do rendimento líquido em ambos os casos. Assim, em ambos os casos, mas particularmente em explorações predominantes de animais há uma margem considerável para melhorar a eficácia das políticas de redução dos impactes ambientais. Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal2019-01-24T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16935eng2183-041X0871-018XRosado, MauríciaMarques, CarlosFragoso, Ruiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-06T09:25:04Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/16935Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:31:11.174066Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences Sustentabilidade dos sistemas dominantes de produção agrícola e pecuária em sequeiro na região Alentejo: diferenças nos resultados económicos e efeitos ambientais |
title |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences |
spellingShingle |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences Rosado, Maurícia Geral |
title_short |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences |
title_full |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences |
title_fullStr |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences |
title_sort |
Sustainability of crop and livestock dominant dryland systems of Alentejo region: differences in economic returns and environmental consequences |
author |
Rosado, Maurícia |
author_facet |
Rosado, Maurícia Marques, Carlos Fragoso, Rui |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Carlos Fragoso, Rui |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosado, Maurícia Marques, Carlos Fragoso, Rui |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Geral |
topic |
Geral |
description |
This paper presents a case study with two traditional Mediterranean-type farming systems: cropping dominant and grazing or livestock dominant. Traditional farming systems from the Mediterranean area in the Alentejo, southern region of Portugal, are compared in terms of economic returns, environmental impacts and trade-offs. A linear programming model that considers the economic and environmental issues for each farming system was developed. The models maximize farm profit subject to managerial, resource and environmental constraints. Environmental impacts were evaluated from cradle-to-grave and assessed following an input-output (I/O) analysis of environmental accounts and a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Results are used for economic evaluation and environmental impacts of farming systems. Results show that livestock predominant farming has larger environmental impact and lower net farm income than the crop farming system. Shadow prices of environmental constraints are compared for both systems to evaluate cost and efficiency of policies that constrains environmental consequences and promote sustainability. Costs required to compensate farmers for reductions of environmental impacts are lower for livestock predominant farming than for crop farms. Therefore, policy priorities should be targeted firstly to livestock predominant farming system effects. Subsidies represent a substantial part of the net farm income in both cases. Hence, in both cases, but particularly with the livestock predominant farming, there is considerable margin to improve policy effectiveness to control environmental impacts. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-24T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16935 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16935 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2183-041X 0871-018X |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130177688567808 |